Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

THE STATE OF THE RACE.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 05:01 PM
Original message
THE STATE OF THE RACE.
Edited on Mon May-05-08 05:11 PM by babylonsister
http://www.prospect.org/csnc/blogs/ezraklein_archive?month=05&year=2008&base_name=the_state_of_the_race

THE STATE OF THE RACE
Ezra Klein


This seems like a big deal. From The LA Times:

Hillary Rodham Clinton, stung last week by the defection of a prominent superdelegate, could lose the backing of more of these Democratic Party leaders and elected officials if she fails to make significant gains in the remaining month of presidential nominating contests, several California superdelegates said this weekend.

Two of the five superdelegates aligned with Clinton who spoke at the annual California Democratic Convention here said they would reconsider their support if rival Barack Obama maintained his lead in elected delegates and the popular vote after the last contests on June 3.


Though Obama seems more embattled than he did a month ago, the math is harder for Clinton to make up with every passing day. The uncommitted superdelegates are a particular class of superdelegates: They have no strong allegiances to either candidate and have been uninterested in making an early endorsement, or folding to the current crush of pressure and making a late endorsement. As Timothy Noah has correctly pointed out, this suggests they are uncommitted because they mean to follow the expressed will of the process, rather than act as freelancers. They have, in any case, exhibited precisely zero interest in making brave, counter-intuitive endorsement decisions. So they're likely to drift in the direction of the numerical winner, which is almost guaranteed to be Obama, for two reasons:

1) It is absolutely impossible for Clinton to overtake him in delegates in the remaining primaries. It can't be done.

2) She's far behind in the popular vote. If you add Florida, where neither campaigned, she's still 300,000 votes behind. If you cheat and add Michigan, where Obama wasn't on the ballot, and you give him the "uncommitted" voters (as some Clintonites have suggested), she's still 188,000 votes behind. If you do all of that, and then Clinton wins every remaining contest by 10 points, according to Rick Hertzberg's calculations, she'll still be 160,000 votes behind. And that doesn't even include Obama's caucusgoers, who aren't in the straight popular votes tally. Point being: She's not making up the popular vote either.

So that's the math. Obama, meanwhile, needs 1/3rd of the uncommitted superdelegates to win, while Hillary needs 2/3rds. And if her pledged superdelegates begin switching to Obama after June 3rd, then the number she needs grows. Clinton's only real hope is that some scandal emerges that makes Obama literally unelectable -- to the point that his superdelegates abandon his campaign and everyone turns to Clinton in desperation. But that's increasingly unlikely. Which makes Clinton's endless assaults over gas tax holidays and elitism more aggravating. Her path to the nomination is very, very unclear. Her chances to win the nomination exceedingly slim. So it'd be one thing for her to remain in the campaign hoping for a lucky break or influence at the convention. But to continually try and damage the likely Democratic nominee and distract attention from McCain is rather more myopic -- and I say that as someone who does not buy into the idea that she's readying herself for 2012.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 05:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. looks like she reads DU
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wileedog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 05:04 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yes, the "Maybe He'll Get Struck By Lightning" strategy
Certainly worth all of this time and money we are pouring into political masturbation while McCain laughs his ass off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Or the 'maybe we can find one last skeleton and milk-it-to-death' strategery. nt
Edited on Mon May-05-08 05:12 PM by babylonsister
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Window Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
4. K/R.
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prophet 451 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 06:03 PM
Response to Original message
5. bookmark for morning
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC