Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Not just bad math but lies again from Hilary

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Egnever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 11:51 AM
Original message
Not just bad math but lies again from Hilary
Edited on Sat May-03-08 11:54 AM by Egnever
So she will pay for the gas holiday with the windfall profits tax on big oil?

I guess the aggresive plan to reduce our dependance on foreign oil she promissed people in Montana was just a lie to get their votes.

http://www.prnewschannel.com/absolutenm/templates/?a=437&z=4

Hillary Clinton has proposed an aggressive plan to reduce our reliance on foreign oil, address global warming, and promote alternative energy.

As President, Hillary will be a strong partner with Montana, investing $150 billion in research, development, and deployment of clean energy over the next decade, including $50 billion through a Strategic Energy Fund paid for with a windfall profits tax on large oil companies.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
keep_it_real Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. Hill has a tailor made promise for every state
But is she keeping a list of her promises so if she was to get in office she could go down the list and fulfill each promise? I don't think so. Just my opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Andy823 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. You got that right!
So many lies, and each time she hopes the voters are to uninformed to notice.

The one thing that should be front and center on her "windfall gas tax" is that even if by some miracle congress did pass the bill, and "IF" they could do it this summer, Bush would never let it become law, he would VETO it in a heart beat! Why can't people understand that? Hillary is just lying in order to try and get votes, that's all it is. Just like she has done on so many other things. It's the same old promises that we hear every year "before" the election, and then never hear about them again "after" the election!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ravy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. Who is it that is math challenged?
The gas holiday proposal is for summer THIS YEAR. Hillary, if she becomes president, will be in office NEXT YEAR to enact further proposals.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Egnever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. yet she pays for both with the same thing
something aint getting paid for. Will it be what she promised you or will it be what she promised the next guy she pandered to?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ravy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Windfall profits taxes for 3 months this year won't effect
windfall profit taxes from the next administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecdab Donating Member (834 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
5. You are looking for logic from a candidate that made an economic proposal
that no economist support - including the ones backing her.

It's pandering - nothing more, nothing less. And it's the same kind of pandering that has left this county without a reliable health care system and landed us in a dumb-ass war in the middle east - playing on ignorance leads to ignorant policies. We've had decades of it - Hillary is simply promising us all more of the same.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
6. We need a pander bear in a pants suit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 10:22 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC