|
I know, what the hell does this have to do with the primaries?
Well, this much, anyway: I have seen numerous rushes to quote stories of questionable (being polite here) content bashing one or the other of the candidates left in the running for the Democratic nomination.
My father was a well-respected journalist in Washington, and if there's one thing I learned long ago, it's that a sensational story that is false will show up on page one and be on everyone's mind, whereas when it gets debunked as crap, it shows up in a tiny one-column story on page 32, and nobody cares.
It seems like there is a LOT of wishful thinking out there, people ready to believe that their own preferred candidate is a saint in white robes, where the one they don't prefer is the devil incarnate--any story that praises their favorite is true, any story that flames the "other one" is true, no matter what the source, no matter how little veracity is involved.
Ignorance is not a new phenomenon. My father didn't know whether to laugh or cry back in the 60s about this (true) story: in North Carolina, a radio announcer, as a joke, gave out an "alert" that an amoeba had been sighted in some part of town, and that people should take appropriate precautions. A few minutes later, he said that another amoeba had been sighted in another part of town, and it was likely that others were in the area. The police telephone lines were jammed by frantic parents looking for ways to get to their kids, and make sure they got protection. The radio guy got suspended. His joke should have gotten laughs, probably did from 20% of his listeners. Instead, people who had no idea what an amoeba was, and couldn't be bothered to look it up, concocted up their own images of Jurassic Park on Main Street and went berserk.
I get the impression sometimes that certain partisan supporters (of whichever of the two candidates) are very frightened by amoeba sightings.
|