Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Howard Dean, MTP ..."The MOST delegates wins"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Blarch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 10:15 AM
Original message
Howard Dean, MTP ..."The MOST delegates wins"
Not the popular vote.

Not 2025

Not who is 'more electable'

THE MOST DELEGATES

Hillary needs to be asked ..."will you follow the rules?"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
IDemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 10:18 AM
Response to Original message
1. Happy to be the first rec
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tiptoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-30-08 12:22 AM
Response to Reply #1
108. Simple MATH: If remaining pledged delegates split 50/50, Clinton needs 69% of uncommitted Super Ds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K Gardner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
2. The only rules Clinton follows are hers.. made up to fit her needs at the moment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blarch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. He leaned forward and slowed his speech...
"The MOST delegates wins"

He made sure these words were heard.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #5
28. That is so friggin awesome! He put it in her face - NO SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS, clinton!
Woohoo!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Triana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. Sounds like someone I dated once and dumped
Edited on Sun Apr-27-08 10:28 AM by Triana
just for that reason. That was their attitude.

That type of attitude is one of a real narcissist. Not someone who just has narcissistic behaviors or tendencies. We've all got that to some extent sometimes. But people who consistently think 'special' rules ought to apply to them NO MATTER WHAT - are malignant narcissists. They can't see their own mistakes, their own hypocrisy, their own desperate ridiculousness, and think they are (or should be) 'above' everyone else. In a word: ELITIST. You know, like the Republicans are - hypocrisy is their hallmark.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reflection Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 05:29 PM
Response to Reply #8
32. "Malignant Narcissism"
Are you a South Park fan, a Rush fan, or both? That's a reference you don't see often. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Angry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 07:12 PM
Response to Reply #32
38. I saw your post...
And had to read the other one to see if there was a Rush reference in there. :-)

I'll have to go find the South Park one, I didn't know they've used that line.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reflection Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 08:33 AM
Response to Reply #38
86. Rush got it from South Park.
If you listen closely to the song, there's a vocal snippet from 'Team America' in there about malignant narcissism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 07:16 AM
Response to Reply #8
75. I have been saying this for months now
A good friend is a clinical psychologist and he says BOTH Hillary and Bill are textbook classic narcissists. A certain amount of narcissism is necessary for any politician or public figure but the Clintons overdosed at the narcissism fountain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LVjinx Donating Member (711 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 10:06 PM
Response to Reply #2
56. Actually, Dean is wrong. 2025 are needed, he needs to stop trying to change the rules
This is like the fifth lame iteration he's tried to foist off on us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krawhitham Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 01:09 AM
Response to Reply #56
66. No you're WRONG
Edited on Mon Apr-28-08 01:09 AM by krawhitham
Most delegates WIN, PERIOD

and one of them will happen to have 2025+ in the end
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
N4457S Donating Member (415 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 10:10 AM
Response to Reply #2
93. Yes...
...and if the Democrats don't do something about it, she and Bill are gonna destroy the party. They nearly did that during their two terms in the White House.

I this morning where Howard Dean apparently has concerns about being Vince Fostered if he doesn't give Hillary what she wants.

I still say Pelosi should call someone from the old neighborhood and take care of this once and for all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Va Lefty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 10:21 AM
Response to Original message
3. I guess Howard is "dead" to the Clintons?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newmajority Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #3
17. Howard was "dead" to the Clintons in 2003
The DLC hasn't stopped attacking him since. It's really pathetic, considering he was the first one to show any leadership in this party whatsoever, this decade.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 08:04 AM
Response to Reply #17
82. I can't believe I am going to say this, but given his endorsement of Hillary
Edited on Mon Apr-28-08 08:06 AM by 48percenter
I now believe that the Clintons DID push Wes Clark to run for CIC in 2003 to take out Dean, so Hilly could run in 2008.

I staunchly defended Wes Clark against this bullshit, but seeing the lengths that the Clintons have gone to in this race, I now think it is entirely possible scenario, they knew the CONS would win, by hook or crook.

I am also sorry that I did not back Howard Dean in 2003. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PassingFair Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 09:42 AM
Response to Reply #82
90. Clinton's DLC buddy, Lieberman, was also working full-time against...
both Dean and the "activist" democrats.

This revolt in the party is LONG overdue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4themind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
4. Whoever gets to the magic number* (from pledged and super dels) gets the nomination
*which right now is 2024. Love that pic btw
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blarch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. he said ..."The rules say ..the most delegates wins"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4themind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #7
16. He's right and there are two types of delegates-nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StevieM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #16
25. There are three types of delegates--elected, caucus and super. All count equally. (eom)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mckeown1128 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 07:29 PM
Response to Reply #25
45. no pledged and unpledged...
It amazes me to see someone swallow idiotic talking points with out question. Do you even realize the Hillary made up the "caucus delegates" no one before her has ever used the term... and those delegates ARE elected by the way. Voters went and voted on them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Political Heretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 02:51 AM
Response to Reply #25
70. That is incorrect.
Both caucus and primary delegates are the same - pledged delegates, elected.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
evolvingsteve Donating Member (130 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #25
94. k, so let's do the math!
Edited on Mon Apr-28-08 10:57 AM by evolvingsteve
Obama: 13 Caucus's won, Clinton: 2

Primaries won: Obama 17 Clinton 16

Obama has the most Pledged delegates and is only 24 superdelegates behind Clinton, which will change even more in favor of Obama soon.

He has the most in Popular votes and won contests.....

MI only had Clinton on the ballot, so we know how fair that primary was....

and FL, well, and in MI, many other Democrats could have voted and it's been proven so but they didn't cause they didn't think it would have counted, and there's no way we are going to disenfranchise them, now are we??? (the ones that didn't get to vote) but, we obviously can't re-vote for both states cause their elected officials broke the rules and grew impatient....this disenfranchisement argument can be used against Clinton when she claims to have the previous results should be counted.....what a bafoon....her own words used against her.....

and now Dean is talking about just the pledged delegates will be the deciding factor, doesn't surprise me because that counts on American voters not SUPER people that have ties or obligations to one person or the other....

but of course, besides that, every other part of the pie will be covered with Obama supporters leading in the end, so we won't even have to debate this, the gap will be even smaller soon and Obama will be the nominee....

by the way, I get these facts from USA today....don't cry now Hillary supporters.

Come join the OBAMA Camp!!!!!

peace






:rant: :rant: :rant: :rant: :rant: :rant: :rant: :rant: :rant: :rant: :rant: :rant: :rant: :rant: :rant: :rant: :rant: :rant: :rant: :rant: :rant: :rant: :rant: :rant: :rant: :rant: :rant: :rant: :rant: :rant: :rant: :rant: :rant: :rant:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Window Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
6. K/R. Hear that Hillary, "the most delegates."
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scurrilous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
9. K & R
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JNelson6563 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
10. Dean is the man.
Edited on Sun Apr-27-08 10:34 AM by JNelson6563
And I still favor him over all the damn pols. I love the way he goes into near throw-down mode with the corporate whore media. They so suck and he is just great at yankin' their leashes. haha Go Howard!

Julie

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
11. He made a point of the one who had the most elected and super delegates
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
12. Makes good sense. If BO is raising more $ and has a broader, deeper fundraising
base; if he has the popular vote and more delegates; why would the head of the Democratic Party enter into a suicide pact with Hillary Clinton? Dean knows what will happen if Clinton picks up the nomination. See my post here...Obama supporters might vote for her...might...but there will be no $ and no volunteering. And if the weather's bad on election day, I can see a lot of Obama supporters staying home.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #12
29. Especially with the new co-financing deal between the DNC and the Obama campaign.
Edited on Sun Apr-27-08 04:54 PM by Zhade
No such deal exists with the clinton campaign -- because she won't be the nominee, of course, so why bother?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
psychopomp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
13. That is the way the process is intended to work
Mr. Dean is just "tellin' it like it is."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dbmk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
14. Well, I don't think anyone is contesting that
Super delegates are delegates too. And right now a few of them can decide this using whatever basis they want. Electability could be such a basis. Impact on the party down the line could be as well.

I am pretty sure he has no intention of pointing anyone in any direction with that comment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZSlacker Donating Member (258 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #14
55. You ar right of course
but Obama has to sway many fewer SD's than Clinton does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blarch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
15. Dean ...
"You cannot change the rules at the end of the game"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greiner3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 09:05 AM
Response to Reply #15
89. You forgot your sarcasm drippy thing!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
18. Video up now.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21134540/vp/24338024#24337977

It is in sections. Other segments on the left.

People have spun this interview so badly.

It was great.

This is the one about the superdelegates. He talks about superdelegate rules and his own personal view.

He makes it clear it is about delegates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
19. of course
nobody's ever argued otherwise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #19
30. HAHAHAHAHA!! Yeah, right, suuuure you haven't.
NT!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. Seriously
when has anybody argued that the person with the fewest delegates wins?

That's absurd.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whopis01 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #31
52. People have argued about a plurality versus an absolute majority.
The OP was trying to point out that Dean was claiming a plurality was needed, not an absolute majority. I'm not sure that is what Dean was meaning to say though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 12:57 AM
Response to Reply #52
65. I've never heard that
I never heard anybody argue - EVER - that having fewer than 2025 delegates should secure the nomination.

The only question is whether having more pledged delegates should secure the nomination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fedja Donating Member (544 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 01:14 AM
Response to Reply #65
67. Is it?
Surely, having -less- pledged delegates should secure the nomination? Especially if the candidate can knock back a stiff one on day 1 and git 'er done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whopis01 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #65
97. Did you read the OP? That was the argument being made there.
and you responded "of course" "nobody's ever argued otherwise"

The OP was quoting Dean and went on to make the argument:

"Not the popular vote. Not 2025. Not who is 'more electable'. THE MOST DELEGATES"

Perhaps you missed the 'Not 2025' portion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 07:50 AM
Response to Reply #19
79. You're telling me/us that you haven't heard the popular vote argument?
Made by

Hillary
Bill
Howard
Terry
Evan
Ed
etc..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #79
102. And who is that argument directed at? Superdelegates who can vote as they please.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #102
103. And when will that happen?
Never.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 05:04 PM
Response to Reply #103
104. Superdelegates vote at the convention.
Though they can make their intentions known, they are not bound to them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 08:23 AM
Response to Reply #104
106. And the leaders have made it abundantly clear that
the pledged delegate leader should get the necessary endorsements to put that candidate over the top.

An SD coup will not happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
otohara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
20. Rules is Rules
unless you've got the Supreme Ct. in your corner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bbgrunt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
21. I do love that good doctor!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Left coast liberal Donating Member (889 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 04:13 PM
Response to Original message
22. That is such a great picture of Howard!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrattotheend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 12:03 AM
Response to Reply #22
63. Love that picture - I'm in it!
I'm the girl on his right with a wide open mouth. That photo was taken 4.5 years ago in Falls Church, VA. The campaign used it in a bunch of literature, and it was later doctored in Photoshop by a Republican running for governor of New Jersey.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
evolvingsteve Donating Member (130 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-29-08 10:22 PM
Response to Reply #63
107. lol
your a little cutie!



;) :loveya:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enrique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 04:41 PM
Response to Original message
23. Dean didn't take sides
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemVet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 04:45 PM
Response to Original message
24. Actually, the rules say...
...the candidate with 2025 delegates wins the Nomination. Not the one with the most delegates (if neither has 2025), but the one with 2025.

If neither candidate has 2025 votes, the superdelegates will vote for whoever they damn well wish to. Most will likely take popular vote into account, among other factors, when making their decision.

Popular vote, you see, DOES matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #24
27. they'll trake lots of things into consideration and hill does not
have the popular vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #24
33. So when enough SDs vote to give Barack 2025
will Hillie "poll the jury" and force them to tell her what reasoning they used to determine her loss?:rofl:

By the time the SDs come into play , he will only need a very small number of them to give him the 2025.. he may only need 60 or so of the remaining 294...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PseudoIntellect Donating Member (701 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #24
36. Most of the SDs have already decided, and it has almost been split down the middle.
About 53-47% victory for Clinton so far in SDs. Except...that margin used to be 80% for her, and in the last few months her lead has dropped drastically after unconvincing performances in the primaries.

Less than a third of the SDs haven't yet decided, and by the recent trends, who do you think it's gonna be?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 04:49 PM
Response to Original message
26. Indeed. Obama will be the nominee.
Gobama!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frickaline Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 05:44 PM
Response to Original message
34. Another misleading thread: he said most SUPERdelagates
><
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #34
41. yes he said Superdelegates not delegates, however.............
many of the Suprs are going for Obama
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blarch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 06:07 AM
Response to Reply #34
72. Bull shit.
Total BS.

Here is the quote...

DR. DEAN: The rules say that the candidate with the most delegates gets the nomination, and I support the rules.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frickaline Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 09:01 AM
Response to Reply #72
88. not true - quotes enclosed
most recently:

"Democratic National Committee Chairman Howard Dean said superdelegates should make known their choices on the Democratic nominee for president by the end of June. Ultimately, he said he believes their decisions will be based on who is more electable, rather than necessarily who has the most pledged delegates, because that is what party rules stipulate."

and prior to this: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21134540/vp/23904990#23904990


I believe you are reading into your quote, he meant superdelegates, thats the rules plain and simple.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 07:44 AM
Response to Reply #34
78. You wish (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frickaline Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 08:59 AM
Response to Reply #78
87. as an undecided voter - I Don't *wish* ... I just read
Edited on Mon Apr-28-08 09:02 AM by frickaline

most recently:

"Democratic National Committee Chairman Howard Dean said superdelegates should make known their choices on the Democratic nominee for president by the end of June. Ultimately, he said he believes their decisions will be based on who is more electable, rather than necessarily who has the most pledged delegates, because that is what party rules stipulate."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 10:02 AM
Response to Reply #34
92. that doesnt even make sense
When Obama finishes with a 150 pledged delegate lead, a 20 superdelegate lead for Hillary will not win it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PseudoIntellect Donating Member (701 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 05:44 PM
Response to Original message
35. The rules don't have her winning, so no, she doesn't want them to be followed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNBrewer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 07:09 PM
Response to Original message
37. He brought me back to the Party
After Bill Clinton and Paul Wellstone drove me away with the Defense of Marriage Act. Too bad he dropped out of the race before I had a chance to go to caucus for him. Same with John Edwards.

(I know....caucus states don't count)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Angry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
39. I'm glad he keeps reminding the candidates that they have responsibilities.

The candidate who doesn't win the nomination MUST go to bat for the candidate who did. His remarks about spending 3 months campaigning for Kerry, going back to the college campuses and such were important.

No matter which candidate makes the cut, the other one needs to immediately get their supporters on the right path. If McCain wins, they will call it another Republican mandate like they did when Bush took office the 2nd time. They said this means that the voters support everything that the administration did and there is no reason to change.

I sure hope we get an answer soon so that the winning candidate can truly get on the attack on McCain. There are so many things he's wrong on that it's going to take months just to lay them all out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frickaline Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #39
42. I think he's doing a really fine job with this very difficult situation
...at least so far. I hope this ends gracefully but I'm a bit nervous about closure on this primary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 07:22 PM
Response to Original message
40. Why ask her? You know she'll just change the subject
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ihelpu2see Donating Member (935 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 07:26 PM
Response to Original message
43. does that mean he said this on Meet the Press today? eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yossariant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 07:26 PM
Response to Original message
44. Yep. Russert said, "ELECTED delegates?" and Dean responded, "Delegates."
Edited on Sun Apr-27-08 07:27 PM by Yossariant
:woohoo:

MR. RUSSERT: The candidate with the most ELECTED delegates is not guaranteed the nomination?

DR. DEAN: The rules say that the candidate with the most delegates gets the nomination, and I support the rules.

MR. RUSSERT: So that the superdelegates could, in effect, overrule the elected delegates?

DR. DEAN: That, you know, you shouldn't think of it that way. So-called "superdelegates" are, in fact, elected by exactly the same people who vote for the elected delegates. This is just--this is like an--a representative democracy. You elect a--80 percent of the delegates, and they have to do what you ask them to do. The others, the 20 percent you elect, essentially do what's in their best judgment, just like the House and the Senate does. Sometimes you like it, and sometimes you don't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 07:33 PM
Response to Original message
46. Personally, I think this post is misleading ! He didn't say that
In fact, I was more discouraged by what he said - he said delegates can
use whatever criteria they want to chose
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #46
49. He quoted the rules, and he said he did not think it would happen that way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blarch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 06:10 AM
Response to Reply #46
73. You are lying...
He DID say that ....

DR. DEAN: The rules say that the candidate with the most delegates gets the nomination, and I support the rules.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 08:24 AM
Response to Reply #73
85. Right - I know that - I was referring to what he said about SDs using
popular vote to pick a candidate to support and that it was the way it should be. I thought he stressed that
(over delegate lead.)

Do you always say things like "You are lying.." Wouldn't it be nicer to say - "could you please explain
what you mean..."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 07:34 PM
Response to Original message
47. Thank you, Dear Dean!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 07:38 PM
Response to Original message
48. Don't be deceived.
This means all the delegates - not just the pledged delegates. They are studying it very carefully. After the elections are over, if the remaining delegates do not put Hillary over the top, then Obama will be the nominee. They will move to him by large number. After FL and MI become irrelevant...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 07:54 PM
Response to Original message
50. Isn't fundraising a sign of "electability" and "popular votes" . . . ???
Edited on Sun Apr-27-08 08:19 PM by defendandprotect
Where are we on that ....
Is HRC still raising tens of millions post her PA success?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcollier Donating Member (887 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 07:59 PM
Response to Reply #50
51. Dean was a little shaky with his stances this morning
But he pulled it together at the end... I hope this week superdelegates will make a move... The media is loving this too much... The media is stealing the spotlight from the real story, and that is the strenght of the democratic party in this primary season...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 09:21 PM
Response to Reply #50
53. That's a questionable argument.
Romney raised more than any Republican and lost horribly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annie1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 09:29 PM
Response to Original message
54. Has he single handedly chosen for the superdelegates?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 10:23 PM
Response to Original message
57. There's my man!
I love that pic. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
debbierlus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 10:26 PM
Response to Original message
58. Well, maybe a war with the democratic party is needed

Let's face it, they haven't really represented us for a very long time. So, if the dem leadership wants to play business as usual, let them play business as usual. What will happen will be a revolt against their betrayal....In the long run, it may be the best thing that could happen. If the DLC loses this election after supplanting a unelected nominee, they will face a revolution in their trusted base. It could be the straw that breaks the back of the party.

They have betrayed us as much as Bush has betrayed his sheep.

Maybe we should stop saying BAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
psychopomp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 10:34 PM
Response to Original message
59. DEMS da RULES
Well said, Sir!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tritsofme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 10:46 PM
Response to Original message
60. Dean is right, at the end of first ballot voting, one candidate will have 2024+ delegates.
That candidate with the most delegates will become the nominee.

From the context that is presented here, it doesn't seem to me as though Mr. Dean made the argument that the candidate with the most elected and caucus delegates automatically wins the nomination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xxqqqzme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 11:06 PM
Response to Original message
61. That is a great picture.
People powered Howard!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrattotheend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 11:33 PM
Response to Original message
62. That's me in that picture!
The girl on his right with her mouth wide open...that's me 4 years ago, in Falls Church, VA. That picture was used in a bunch of promotional literature for the campaign, and later Photoshopped by a Republican running for governor of New Jersey. Someone told me I was in a commercial in Iowa too, but I never saw it. Man, do I look stupid in that picture. Oh well, it was still kind of cool.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
writes3000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 12:55 AM
Response to Reply #62
64. You have a great, great face. So warm and genuine. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Apollo11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 06:10 AM
Response to Reply #62
74. Are you the person in the cap holding up the sign?
That is a cool memory you can keep forever! B-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrattotheend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 08:09 AM
Response to Reply #74
83. Yup, that's me
I look kind of stupid, but oh well. I got 5 minutes of fame when Brett Schundler, a Republican running for governor of NJ, photoshopped the picture to make it look like it was his rally instead of Dean's. A reporter interviewed me and did an article about me as part of the story about the doctoring of that photo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Apollo11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #83
100. Awesome!
Edited on Mon Apr-28-08 03:09 PM by Apollo11
I remember that photoshop story. They changed your sign to say "Schundler reFORm Governor".



Man - you could have totally sued his a$$! ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex_Goodheart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 07:26 AM
Response to Reply #62
76. I'm in love
Will you marry me? (I love Howard Dean, too. And dogs)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quantass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 02:31 AM
Response to Original message
68. k&r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 02:49 AM
Response to Original message
69. That's it! Those are the rules!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Apollo11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 06:02 AM
Response to Original message
71. Howard Dean is being totally fair and balanced
Edited on Mon Apr-28-08 06:09 AM by Apollo11
I am studying the transcript of yesterday's Meet The Press, and it is clear to me that Howard Dean is being "fair and balanced".

Dean is defending the right of the superdelegates to exercise their judgement and support whichever candidate they think would have the best chance of beating John McCain in November.

He does not agree with the Obama campaign's implied position that the superdelegates are obliged to vote for whichever candidate has the most pledged delegates after all the contests are wrapped up.

Dean also said that he hopes the Rules Committee will find a way of dealing with Florida and Michigan that takes voters rights into account: "First, you got to respect the voters. The voters of Michigan and Florida were not the people that screwed this all up."

I have no idea why Obama supporters are jumping on this interview as if Dean was dissing Hillary or something.

Transcript: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/24338217/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Medusa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 07:32 AM
Response to Original message
77. Yep. That's how the rules of the DNC work.
But suddenly the Clintons want to erase all of that and change them in their favor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 07:58 AM
Response to Original message
80. Hillary: "Rules? We don't need no stinkin' rules!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pavlovs DiOgie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 08:00 AM
Response to Original message
81. That picture brings me back to the days
when Howard was running for President. I still love that guy! Thank goodness he is the head of the DNC. Right now that's about all that's giving me confidence that our party will resolve this mess fairly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undeterred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 08:18 AM
Response to Original message
84. This is just too complicated for Hillary supporters to understand...
but the polls...

but the popular vote...

but Michigan and Florida...

but Hillary is busy breaking the arms of the superdelegates...

but she's gonna whine and cry so long and loud we can't stand it...

but WE DON'T PLAY BY THE RULES, WE'RE THE CLINTONS AND WE MAKE UP OUR OWN RULES!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iggo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
91. You people are just figuring this out?
"Howard Dean, MTP ...'The MOST delegates wins'..."

This has been true from the very start, and obvious to most. And yet for months now, we've had this little board war between the followers of both candidates. ("Followers"...yikes!)

This is why GD:Pissed has been sent to the corner for the duration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkansas Granny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
95. Hasn't it always been about the number of delegate that will determine
Edited on Mon Apr-28-08 11:22 AM by Arkansas Granny
the nominee? The argument I've seen is the criteria the superdelegates use to determine their vote, i.e. popular vote, delegate vote or their assessment as to who's the best candidate.

Edited to add:

Didn't Dean say just a few days ago that the superdelegates vote their conscience?

WASHINGTON -- Citing Democratic rules, national committee Chairman Howard Dean on Tuesday said that the superdelegates who are poised to select the party's presidential nominee are free to back whomever they wish at the end of the primaries, regardless of who leads in the popular vote or pledged delegates.

"They should use whatever yardstick they want," Dean said in an interview at party headquarters. "That's what the rules provide for."

http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-na-superdelegates2apr02,1,7387579.story

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
knixphan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
96. Go Howard-
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Major Hogwash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
98. Good-bye Hillary. Good-bye Bubba. Take your racist bullshit somewhere else.
Just get off of the national stage!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Texas Hill Country Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
99. the most DELEGATES... that includes super that can use any measuring stick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 03:06 PM
Response to Original message
101. Delegates = Pledged + Supers. Pop vote is an argument for SUPERS.
Electability is an argument for Super delegates.

This OP is the quintessential straw man.

Answering an argument never posed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barack the house Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-30-08 12:56 AM
Response to Reply #101
111. No it's not a popular vote at all as it woud be just the big states counted they wouldn't...
Edited on Wed Apr-30-08 12:58 AM by barack the house
need the smaller ones. No popular vote exists. It's a dlegate race so small states count.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
azmouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 05:47 PM
Response to Original message
105. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barack the house Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-30-08 12:53 AM
Response to Original message
109. There is no popular vote delegates are assigned so small states are counted.
Edited on Wed Apr-30-08 12:54 AM by barack the house
It's a delegate race he won and earned. You work hard play by the rules and one day you can be president.

A popular vote would mean everyone would go california or NY easy as that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ramonna Villota Donating Member (57 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-30-08 12:53 AM
Response to Original message
110. YES
I feel a lot better about this
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-30-08 01:03 AM
Response to Original message
112. Supers are delegates too...and they both will need them
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 06:58 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC