Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Joint Chiefs chair: US prepping military options against Iran

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Windy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 10:27 PM
Original message
Joint Chiefs chair: US prepping military options against Iran
Adm. Michael Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said that the Pentagon is planning "potential" military actions against Iran, reports The Washington Post.

Mullen criticized Iran's "'increasingly lethal and malign influence' in Iraq," writes Ann Scott Tyson for the Post.

Addressing concerns about the US military's capability of dealing with yet another conflict at a time when forces are purportedly stretched thin, Mullen said war with Iran "would be 'extremely stressing' but not impossible for U.S. forces, pointing specifically to reserve capabilities in the Navy and Air Force," Tyson notes.

"It would be a mistake to think that we are out of combat capability," she quotes the U.S.'s top military leader at a Pentagon news conference.

Mullen's assertion comes a day after American forces reportedly fired warning shots at Iranian speedboats in the Persian Gulf, a confrontation that Iran denies took place.

A prior incident involving U.S. forces in the Strait of Hormuz and Iranian speedboats in January of this year--which Republican White House candidates used (with the notable exception of Ron Paul) as a saber-rattling opportunity during a nationally-televised debate--was later discredited as a virtual fabrication.

Excerpts from the Post article, available in full here, follow...

#
...Mullen made clear that he prefers a diplomatic solution to the tensions with Iran and does not foresee any imminent military action. "I have no expectations that we're going to get into a conflict with Iran in the immediate future," he said.

Mullen's statements and others by Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates recently signal a new rhetorical onslaught by the Bush administration against Iran, amid what officials say is increased Iranian provision of weapons, training and financing to Iraqi groups that are attacking and killing Americans.

In a speech Monday at West Point, Gates said Iran "is hell-bent on acquiring nuclear weapons." He said a war with Iran would be "disastrous on a number of levels. But the military option must be kept on the table given the destabilizing policies of the regime and the risks inherent in a future Iranian nuclear threat."

Army Gen. David H. Petraeus, the top U.S. commander in Iraq, who was nominated this week to head all U.S. forces in the Middle East, is preparing a briefing soon to lay out detailed evidence of increased Iranian involvement in Iraq, Mullen said. The briefing will detail, for example, the discovery in Iraq of weapons that were very recently manufactured in Iran, he said.

http://rawstory.com/news/2008/Joint_Chiefs_chair_US_prepping_military_0425.html

So HRC supporters, how's the Kyl/Lieberman Amendment support working for you? What is HRC going to say if Bush goes into Iran from Iraq????

Wake up!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 10:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. And by sheer coincidence --
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MidwestTransplant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 10:37 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. No doubt that's coming from the Cheney branch of gov't
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sniffa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 10:32 PM
Response to Original message
2. Are they preparing to obliterate Iran?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 10:33 PM
Response to Original message
3. FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 10:35 PM
Response to Original message
4. Damn! This must be Plan B so that a Pub can win the election......
Since Plan A aka get Hillary the nom so she can lose isn't working.

Not good.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 10:35 PM
Response to Original message
5. How is Obama's lack of taking a stand on Kyl/Lieberman working for you?
He'll stick his finger in the wind, gauge the attitude of the American public depending upon how events develop, and declare that's how he would have voted.

Or he'll give a mighty speech. Who knows.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 10:39 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Clinton voted for it. What does that tell you about HER judgement?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 10:46 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. It tells me she knows Iran leadership is not out there to play nicey-nice with the U.S.
As for judgment, at least she took a stand, after the most incendiary language in Kyl/Lieberman was removed. Now my concern is focused on the judgment of Gen. Petraeus.

I can't wait to hear what Obama has to say about all this. Maybe this is a test for him, you think? Have you considered that the right wing is ginning this up to test his response? Please do consider it. I don't believe in coincidences.

With that, it's late, good-night.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 10:47 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Tells me she doesn't understand the Neocons' strategy.
Edited on Sat Apr-26-08 10:47 PM by anonymous171
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. Obama’s missed vote
Edited on Sat Apr-26-08 10:49 PM by stillcool47
from not being able to get back for the vote that was moved up....

The congressional record clearly states that senators were informed that the Kyl-Lieberman amendment would not be coming up for a vote in the near future.

Mr. REID. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the order for the quorum call be rescinded.


The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered.

Mr. REID. Mr. Chairman, there will be no more votes tonight. We have tried to work something out on the Kyl-Lieberman amendment and the Biden amendment. We have been unable to do that.

We have been very close a few times, but we have just been informed that Senator Biden will not have a vote anytime in the near future. There will not be a vote on the other one anytime in the near future. We hope tonight will bring more clearness on the issue.

But right now, I think it is fair to say there will be no votes tonight.

Does the Senator from South Dakota have any comments?

Mr. THUNE. No, I do not. I would say to the leader, that is good for our Members to know. We have Members who have been inquiring whether they will be able to vote.



Barack Obama took a position on the issue

The Counter-Proliferation Act of 2007 that Obama voted for had language that specifically stated:

Nothing in this Act shall be construed as authorizing the use of force or the use of the United States Armed Forces against Iran.

This act was about economic sanctions rather than military action, something that Obama has long advocated. It specifically checks any potential use to go to war. It also does not connect Iran with Iraq as does the Kyl-Lieberman bill.


* 9/12/07: Obama to Bush: You Don’t Have Our Authorization for War with Iran
* 8/30/07: Barack Obama Editorial: Hit Iran Where It Hurts
* 8/29/07: Alabama Senator Blocking Obama’s Iran Divestment Bill
* 7/31/07: Obama Urges Swift Passage of Iran Divestment Bill
* 5/17/07: Barack Obama Introduces Iran Divestment Bill


Therefore, Obama is not a Johnny-come-lately on this issue. He has the right to speak out about it since he has been a public voice on it prior to the Kyl-Lieberman vote in late September.
------------------------------------------------
The interesting thing to me is that some bloggers are more concerned about a candidate who couldn’t get back in time for a vote, but took a clear position on it rather than with the possibility that Clinton’s vote could potentially be used by Bush to take us into war with Iran.
http://thinkonthesethings.wordpress.com/2007/10/11/did-obama-skip-the-iran-vote/


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cali_Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-26-08 10:49 PM
Response to Original message
11. Hillary of course would support the obliteration of Iran
She craves death and destruction. Just like how a crack fiend craves his crack.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC