Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So the Archie Bunker voters went for Clinton yesterday...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
sakura Donating Member (660 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 12:55 PM
Original message
So the Archie Bunker voters went for Clinton yesterday...


Do you really think they'll vote for Maude in the fall?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. Don't be a meathead! They're gonna vote for McCain!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakura Donating Member (660 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. I was a little kid when that show was on...
Archie's yelling really used to upset me.

Of course, Archie's a lot like my dad...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shae Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #1
35. actually some of them vote for Clinton now...
and vote for McCain later.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #35
108. Yep. In PA, that is true. I know about 10 people who would do that and
it not about being pissed at Obama. There are a lot of them here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
livetohike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
2. Welcome to DU!
:hi: I would vote for Maude. I loved that show :-).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
3. Don't diss Archie, Edith would have been able to convince him to go for Obama by the end of the...
...episode. But when he got back to the bar he'd tell everyone he voted for Hillary. :)

PB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mezzo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
5. What an elitist thing for you to say. Telling
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakura Donating Member (660 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. It's the media, in their need to categorize everything, that has called them Archie Bunker voters.

http://www.blog.newsweek.com/blogs/stumper/archive/2008/04/18/why-do-archie-bunker-voters-love-hillary.aspx

http://firedoglake.com/2008/03/06/election-2008-crossing-the-archie-bunker-divide/

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&sid=ahy3m.pVsbT0&refer=us



Who are you telling?

My mom?

She already knows who I'm voting for. And though she disagrees with it, she's okay with it. She also has a sense of humor. That seems rare for a Clinton supporter, at least around DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mezzo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #10
39. so you embrace teh media when you want, eh? Telling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #39
40. So you embrace a candidate that appeals to bigots, eh? Telling...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakura Donating Member (660 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #39
47. Who are you telling?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #47
67. "Telling" is an adjective here, not a verb.
As in, it "tells a lot about you ..."

Hard to be both elitist and dumb at the same time, but you're pulling it off.

Bake
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakura Donating Member (660 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #67
74. Thanks for the insult.
That seems to be one thing your comments on this site have in common.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #74
96. If you're going to look down your nose at the "Archie Bunkers"
You should expect to be insulted. That was an incredibly condescending OP. They used to be the bedrock of the Democratic Party. I think we need to try to get them back.

By the way, I can't help but laugh when an Obama supporter complains about insults. You people are the biggest bomb-throwers on DU.

Bake
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leopolds Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #96
105. Archie Bunker uused to be the bedrock of the Democratic Party? Is that why they voted for Nixon
Because of "that god-damned Martin Luther King and those rabble rousers"
as a great many ethnic blue-collar voters put it????????

Or maybe you identify with those sentiments. Telling.

NON-RACIST blue-collar voters (aka populists)
have always been the bedrock of the progressive
coalition. You can keep your self-hating Dems.

I just got lectured by a low-paid relative who
said that if I wanted to get ahead in life and
provide for my family I should abandon my chosen
profession because it "might not work out for me."

That is the Archie Bunker economic mentality in
a nutshell -- self-hating towards other low-paid
workers, admiring only those who are able to
"get ahead" and critical of those who fall behind,
and racist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #105
107. I'm not talking about fucking bigots, and you know it.
I'm talking about the characterization of all blue-collar "undeducated" workers as "Archie Bunkers."

And yeah, I remember when working class, union members were the bedrock of the party. It sure wasn't the fucking latte elitists ...

Bake
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leopolds Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #107
111. I detest latte sipping elitists. However, self-hating working class (black and white) side with them
Edited on Thu Apr-24-08 11:44 AM by Leopolds Ghost
Side with the elitists Without fail,

when they encounter real-life coalitions involving yuppies vs. working class interests.

Reagan was a genius in redefining the word "elitism" to mean

"Wealthy class traitors who oppose the working (white) man's
inherent right to ESCAPE the working class."

This causes all working class white voters who feel they have been placed in the wrong "caste"
(with those grubby minorities) to feel that ANYONE
who is obsessed with helping working class people qua
working class is, by definition, a class traitor who wants to keep the working (white) man down.

It was pure genius of anti-leftist framing,

Straight out of Horatio Alger and the anti-leftist, anti-populist
(or "right wing populist") scab mentality documented in Upton Sinclair's
"the Jungle".

Note: I am not a leftist, at least not in the sense of being a fan of government. I am a populist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakura Donating Member (660 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 11:49 PM
Response to Reply #96
124. Apparently, we have a very different conception of what defines the Archie Bunker voter.
If you are claiming that racists are the bedrock of the democratic party, you have a warped view of things. There is a difference between a blue collar worker and an Archie Bunker. Your candidate is courting both. I'm not surprised you would resort to insults. It seems to be your response to every other post here. If you look at the posts I have written, I have not resorted to such tactics with anyone. A racist is a racist is a racist. If you are not one, you should not feel personally insulted. And if you ARE one, it's not an insult. It's an accurate characterization.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #67
100. ...
:spray:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trajan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 12:41 AM
Response to Reply #10
137. Im a Clinton supporter ...
Edited on Fri Apr-25-08 12:42 AM by Trajan
And I am an Obama supporter ...

One slightly more than the other ...

What seems rare in DU is a big tent Democrat who is unwilling to keep themselves from being drawn into the internecine warfare of the primary campaign ....

What is a good thing: Most of the Democratic electorate is not nearly as strident and egocentric as GD:P partisans who think their choice can be the only choice ...... FUCK that ....

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mags Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #5
65. the typical BO voter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Telly Savalas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #65
71. Who are you trying to win over with that attitude, asshole?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mags Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #71
72. no one, the BO supporters have on blinders, I for sure am not trying to
wake them out of their dream.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YOY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 12:59 PM
Original message
You know Lady Godiva was a Free-eedom Rider
Goddamn that song is stuck in my head now...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greguganus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
29. ...Songs that made the hit paraaaaaaaade!!!!!...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
6. fuck, let's just continue with the stupid generalizations
and the demeaning comments about working class dems. that's really helpful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakura Donating Member (660 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. My parents are working class, Cali
I don't think this comment demeans them. My dad has stated loudly and clearly that he will never, ever vote for Clinton. He was never the most liberal person, but he voted a straight democratic ticket until the mid nineties, until Bill began to disappoint him. Since then, he's been on the fence. Growing up, he seemed a lot like Archie Bunker to me-- and Archie did have his good side, you know-- just like Dad. My Archie Bunker would never vote for Hilary--not if a John McCain is around. But if the choice were Hilary or Barack, he'd hold his nose and vote for her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #11
28. Anyone that believes Archie will vote for Hillary is delusional.
Sure, he'd vote for her over Obama but never over McCain. Never.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
death to the DLC Donating Member (94 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #6
20. well, cali, when people continue
to vote against their own best interests, at some point, one just has to say, "You can't help those that won't help themselves."

To hell with them, the days of pandering are over. Truth will either reign supreme or we all die.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #6
30. Wow--I agree with you. It's the in thing to dog on The Great Unwashed, but
I think it might have something to do with all those elections we keep losing.

Apparently it makes some people feel better about themselves, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakura Donating Member (660 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #30
37. I think it's insulting to apply demographic categories to any group.
It's convenient, though, to pigeon-hole people. My OP referred to a categorization that has been made by the media multiple times, and just took that analogy a little further, for humor's sake. Did I mean to offend or demean? No, actually. If you strongly identify with Archie Bunker, I apologize.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shakespeare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #6
34. The demographics are what they are.
Hell, I'm not even an Obama supporter, and that's starkly clear to me--the voters for whom race was an issue (translation: don't want a black president) were overwhelmingly lower income, uneducated whites. I have one side of my family who falls into that demographic, and it's not a proud thing.

But nobody can talk about it without getting throttled around here. And I'm disgusted that we have so many of them in our party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robicon Donating Member (18 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #6
59. agreed
yes, I'm new here, but class warfare and cries of "racist!!!11!" or "sexist!!1" are ridiculous on this website.

vote the issues and leave the mindless drivel out of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #6
68. Thanks for the note of sanity, cali.
:hi:

Bake
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leopolds Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #6
106. Voters for whom race was an issue (don't want a black prez) were overwhelmingly lower income whites.
Deal with it, cali.

What the f*ck do you want to say to working class whites if your candidate (whom I'd prefer over Clinton) REFUSES (as Tweety points out) to adopt a traditional DEmocratic message (populist, anti-Wall Street) and your favorite white folks REFUSE to give up their racism? People CONSTANTLY criticize working class BLACK people for their "cultural deficiencies", including wealthy blacks. It's considered acceptable discourse.

As Shakespeare said downthread:

"the voters for whom race was an issue (translation: don't want a black president) were overwhelmingly lower income, uneducated whites. I have one side of my family who falls into that demographic, and it's not a proud thing. But nobody can talk about it without getting throttled around here. And I'm disgusted that we have so many of them in our party."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bevoette Donating Member (609 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
7. i have a truly honest question...
that i'm sure will get me pounded around here, but here goes...

what, exactly, would people say the difference is between:

rural, white, uneducated, working-class voters that vote for Clinton in blue states

and

rural, white, uneducated, working-class voters that vote for (insert republican here) in red states?



other than the 'yellow dog democrat' argument...what issues separate these voters?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakura Donating Member (660 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #7
31. That's a good question.
I've lived in rural parts of both red and blue states. The major difference I see is one of self-identification. Some people seem themselves as republican or democrat because that's what there parents were, or how they voted in the past. In terms of the issues, there often isn't a difference. That's been my experience, anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
death to the DLC Donating Member (94 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #31
38. I live in SW Missouri
and if you are a redneck it's cool to be a Republican.

Economics has nothing to do with it. Those on disability, in debt with houses and cars they can't afford, and those that live paycheck to paycheck, Republicans all. They think it's still "in" - of course, this part of the country has always been 5 years behind the coasts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carolina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #31
62. Congenital Dems and congenital repukes!
I see it here in the south a lot. People who are republican just because everyone else in the family is!

Add that to the lack of education, the vacuousness of the media and voila...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
juno jones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 09:04 PM
Response to Reply #62
95. You see religion being passed on much the same way.
From one uncritical generation to the next, going along because that's the way it's alway been.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leopolds Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #7
109. Perhaps Obama would have better luck appealing to rural, white uneducated POPULISTS, dammit
Who ALREADY oppose Clinton and everything she stands for,

and don't buy into the "socialism of fools" (racism and anti-semitism construed as "elites", wealthy white businessmen = "defenders of the working class white man's right to upward mobility").

Perhaps, just maybe, cali? Do you think?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoPasaran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
8. ...While Barry locked up the Meathead vote
Edited on Wed Apr-23-08 01:04 PM by NoPasaran
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakura Donating Member (660 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. Yes, he certainly did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnnyLib2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
9. In memory of all the good, hardworking Democrats who brought me up in that

tradition--please rethink what you are saying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakura Donating Member (660 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. I was brought up in that tradition, too.
My point is that there are plenty of voters who would choose Hilary over Barack, who would also choose McCain over Hilary. Do you think otherwise?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mags Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #9
66. I was brought up in the South, on a farm, very hard working
parents of 5 children ,who all went to College. You BO folks show the rest of the Country what real elitism is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RBInMaine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
14. I will say though, that we do have to work to get more "Archies" back.
White working class used to be a much stronger part of the Dem base, and they should vote with us the bread and butter issues. We CAN get many back (as Bill Clinton did in his races) by speaking better to their issues and values (yes, we CAN talk about religion and guns) AND by framing more effectively to them on the bread and butter issues (jobs, healthcare, and education).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakura Donating Member (660 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #14
21. I agree.
Bill Clinton did an excellent job bringing back working class voters. He gave them hope (which was continually disparaged by the press) and at the beginning, he really did help them out. But he also did a lot to discourage them. When my dad's job (he had a federal job) was downsized by the Clinton admin, he lost confidence. NAFTA made things even worse. In my dad's eyes, Bill went from being a person who could unite us, someone who really cared about the "regular" guy, to someone who "said one thing and did another." If Hilary were any other woman, I doubt my dad would vote for her in the general election. But the fact that she's Bill's wife makes it even worse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #14
69. Fuck 'em, they're white people. We don't need 'em.
:sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm:

Bake
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
desi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
15. And Obama got what, 90-100% of the Louis Farrakhan
vote :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakura Donating Member (660 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. Are you a demographer?
I haven't heard that term bandied about in the press. Maybe you can share with us what constitutes the Farrakhan demographic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
desi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. The opposite of the "Archie Bunkers" ?
yes there are racists and bigots who do not "look like Archie Bunker."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakura Donating Member (660 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. I never said there weren't. That's your inference.
But demographers don't define things in terms of opposites. Just how big is this Farrakhan bloc you mentioned? What are their characteristics (ones that can be described in positive terms-- not the opposite of another group)?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
desi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #22
32. And I never said that I was a "demographer"
maybe you can enumerate the so-called "Archie Bunker" types who "went with Hillary." Were they the gun toting bible thumpers from the hills of PA?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakura Donating Member (660 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #32
41. I didn't think up this term. But here are some links...
... you might find helpful. I look forward to your reply that fleshes out the characteristics of Farrakhan voters.


http://www.blog.newsweek.com/blogs/stumper/archive/2008...

http://firedoglake.com/2008/03/06/election-2008-crossin... /

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&sid=ahy...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leopolds Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #19
116. You are complaining about "black racists and bigots" who you must feel are holding you up.
After all, no "red blooded American" deserves to actually REMAIN working
class and uneducated. Their purpose in life is to sacrifice their life in
the mills so their CHILDREN can escape their own self-hated lifestyle,
thereby ensuring their heirs never identify with those who remain behind!

That is the Horatio Alger mindset, and it goes double for immigrants.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #15
48. Any link for that claim?
:shrug:

I thought Ed Rendell was a Hillary Clinton supporter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 01:27 PM
Response to Original message
16. LOL!
:rofl:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Algorem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
18. who did the George Jeffersons vote for?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakura Donating Member (660 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #18
24. Good question.
I'm guessing Gloria voted for Hilary, just to spite Meathead. After she grew a spine, that is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donheld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #18
25. Louise voted for Hillary, but told George she was voting Obama
George voted Obama and everybody in the high-rise new it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakura Donating Member (660 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. Don't you mean DEEEELUX apartment in the sky? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leopolds Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #18
114. George Jefferson voters don't matter... "they were already voting for Obama"
Everyone knows that the working class white racist vote (Nixon/Reagan Dems
who would vote Republican if they had any money) is MUCH more receptive
to swinging Obama's way and therefore more important.

Why, Obama could have gotten 30% of their votes if he had only tried!

Keep in mind that these people ONLY left the New Deal coalition because of
Welfare, Affirmative Action, and integration attempts... abandon those
"handouts" for the George Jeffersons of the world (and their "gangland friends" as the Willie Horton admeister styles it -- just like every
Italian knows a mafia member and every Irishman has a brawling drunk
relative) and we'll win them back EASILY and RESTORE the Broad-Based
Progressive Platform!!!!!

Won't we?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donheld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
23. You must be a dingbat!
What are you smoking?
You really think Archie would vote for either of our candidates?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakura Donating Member (660 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #23
26. Actually, my Dad is voting for McCain.
He's my Archie. And I love him anyway!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cbayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
33. I really don't get your point.
Are you denigrating white, working class people? Perhaps you could elaborate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakura Donating Member (660 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #33
42. I have elaborated.
Read the entire thread. I'd be happy to clarify if you have any questions outstanding after that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cbayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #42
57. You said that Archie Bunker types voted for Clinton yesterday.
You linked to three articles that also used this term.

All three talked about how this is a strong base for Clinton that Obama is having trouble reaching.

You said your father was one of these types, but he would vote for McCain and never vote for Clinton. The definition in the articles you link does not match what you say about your father, therefore he is not an Archie Bunker type is you use the definition in your links.

Then you post a picture of Maude and ask will they vote for Maude in November. Are you using Maude to represent Clinton?

The whole OP and thread make no sense at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakura Donating Member (660 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #57
60. We all know what Archie Bunker types are.
The articles I quoted didn't define the term. They used a fictional figure so well understood by the American public that his chair is at the Smithsonian, to describe a bloc of voters. My Dad, in my view (and I do know him better than you, as far as I know), does fit the Bunker stereotype, as well as anyone does. Your argument is specious. Clinton may be reaching the Bunker base NOW, but how they will vote in November is still up for discussion. Hence the discussion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gaspee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
36. Nice
So if someone votes for Clinton, they're a racist and ignorant?

If someone disagrees with your choice then they are morally suspect?

Good to know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakura Donating Member (660 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 01:59 PM
Original message
Is that what my post said?
I thought it said that Clinton got the Archie Bunker vote. Do the two equate in your mind? Is Archie Bunker morally suspect in your mind?

Way to jump to conclusions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beaverhausen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
45. You knew exactly what using the "Archie Bunker" reference means
don't play dumb. And please, this brand of "unity" and "hope" isn't what your candidate is all about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakura Donating Member (660 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #45
49. What is your candidate about?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gaspee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
54. Way to prevaricate
Look - you implied that Clinton got the racist vote. Do you not agree that racists are morally suspect?

You're really getting people to vote for Obama, there. Calling them ignorant racists *really* makes people change their minds! Go you!

And are you really that stupid? It sure seems that way.

And you know what?

Fuck this. I haven't been to DU in weeks because of people like you.

You all can have this place.

Good luck winning the general without half the party.

Let me know how that works out for ya!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakura Donating Member (660 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #54
58. Whose candidate said, "If you can't stand the heat..."
Yours, I think.

Goodbye and good luck.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
88. Your disingenuousness is not clever or cute.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakura Donating Member (660 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #88
90. If you have nothing to say, use an ad hominem remark.
Is that your strategy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeattleGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
43. Unnecessary roughness!
There's no need to do this.

Your generalization of people sucks.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakura Donating Member (660 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #43
46. It's the media generalization.
Just like Reagan Democrat, Working Collar Vote, etc. And I agree. It does suck to make generalizations about people you don't know. Do you know me?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
44. Oh geeze.
Edited on Wed Apr-23-08 02:03 PM by ShortnFiery
There's a hellofva lot more material to "smear" the Clintons and it's not all LIES. The Clintons BOTH have a rich history of corrupt and/or questionable behaviors. I'd bet money, there's new VALID evidence of their misbehaviors that the right wingers are holding close to the vest.

If HRC steals the Nomination it will be "a Clintonian blood-bath" ... they won't have political asses left by the end of the GE campaign and McCain will win in a landslide.

I know right wingers because I live among them ... they're "sweating bullets" at the mere notion of going up against Obama because the traditional attacks will fall flat.

I admire Maude. The sitcom character "Maude" had integrity. Therefore, HRC is no Maude. :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakura Donating Member (660 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #44
51. You're right. She's no Maude.
I admire Maude's character, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
knixphan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
50. Wasn't Barack explaining how Archies got hoodwinked?
By the GOP, nad lately the DLC...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
52. Actually it was alot of Bucks County Well Educated upscale folks who voted for her
in the PA suburbs. It would help if you had any idea of what you are talking about...:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakura Donating Member (660 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #52
53. Again, it was the media who have categorized some of Clintons
supporters as Archie Bunkers, Reagan Democrats, etc. That certainly doesn't mean all of her voters are, and it's not what I wrote. You might want to reread my extremely short OP again before drawing erroneous conclusions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #53
73. Your reply to me was more than that Hack Post with photos....
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakura Donating Member (660 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #73
84. My post was intended to elicit discussion.
Your post, on the other hand, seems to have been intended to insult.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 06:20 PM
Response to Reply #84
86. Yeah..so COOL...so Righteous....So Good..and you love that every time I post
I'm kicking your crap. :-(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakura Donating Member (660 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #86
92. Are you replying to another post?
You really are not making any sense, o mighty crap-kicker.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leopolds Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #52
119. Thus proving that WHITE RACISM and admiration of Clinton's elitism is the real issue here.
There are still plenty of working class, white POPULISTS. they voted for Obama.

It's the self-hating "Nixon Dems" who resent black people trying to
move ahead of them in the (stalled) upward mobility pyramid
that are the issue of the OP.

They added to Hillary's total in counties like York, Chester and
Allegheney where a NAFTA proponent should have no chance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Tires Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
55. archie would be part of that 16 (!) percent that voted for ron paul
lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
56. You hit pretty close to the mark, sakura.
Must have touched a nerve to get the Clintonistas out in a display of poutrage here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakura Donating Member (660 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #56
77. Sure looks like it.
Thanks for the support!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VotesForWomen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
61. you mean like those white folks in UT an WY who voted for O? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakura Donating Member (660 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #61
80. I don't remember writing that white=archie bunker
Perhaps you can elaborate. What does an older white man from the Bronx have to do with people from those two states? Have you been to UT or WY? Did all the people there seem the same to you? Did they all remind you of Archie?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hell-bent Donating Member (593 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 03:15 PM
Response to Original message
63. So did the George Jefferson vote go for Obama?
Edited on Wed Apr-23-08 03:17 PM by hell-bent
:rofl: I see someone else asked that question. Sorry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakura Donating Member (660 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #63
79. That's okay!
I think the "successful, black business man who came from nothing" type would be attracted to Obama. As would someone like the independent, free-thinking Weezie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jamastiene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 03:18 PM
Response to Original message
64. Stifle it, sakura
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakura Donating Member (660 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 06:02 PM
Response to Reply #64
75. Oh, Jamasteine!
Sorry. It's hard to get the Edith screech down, but I tried. Glad to see you have a sense of humor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
70. If Clinton/media can convince them that a mixed race man is "the real racist"...
Edited on Wed Apr-23-08 04:37 PM by Dr Fate
...and that Obama is "the real elitist"...

...then McCain/Media will have NO PROBLEM getting them to turn against "Maude" with any half-made up talking points they can muster- you nailed it.

Team Hillary has placed bets on a very fickle bunch- and I agree with you- a large number of them will EASILY be convinced to switch back to their GOP voting pattern- ironically it will be with the same tactics and talking points Hillary is using on them now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakura Donating Member (660 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #70
76. An earlier poster said the that the character of Maude was a person of integrity...
... and I agree. So I guess the analogy breaks down at that point. The "real" Maude would never stoop to the tactics Hillary has used.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #76
78. I agree- but perceptions are all that matters with most swing-voters.
Edited on Wed Apr-23-08 06:08 PM by Dr Fate
If the media can fool swing-voters into perceiving Obama as a pro-terrorist, racist elitist, then portraying Hillary as an out of touch feminist stuck in the early 70's (AKA Maude) wont be too difficult.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakura Donating Member (660 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #78
81. Agreed.
It's sad, though. What percent of voters do you think vote with their emotions only?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 06:11 PM
Response to Original message
82. I'll recommend this one. It's a point to ponder
Edited on Wed Apr-23-08 06:14 PM by Armstead
"I'll vote for that gal over that commie negro. But if I can choose an old white guy, gimme the white guy."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakura Donating Member (660 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #82
83. Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 06:18 PM
Response to Original message
85. Are you asserting that any---ANY---vote not for Obama is RACISM??
Edited on Wed Apr-23-08 06:19 PM by WinkyDink
Oh, but that doesn't work in REVERSE, does it? Noooo; Oprah is for Obsma because he's....The One. Riiiiiight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 06:21 PM
Response to Reply #85
87. THIS POSTER is NOT to blame for that "impression you have" it's MOST OF THEM! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #87
91. Do you live in PA? I do, and have, for 58 years. We're no more racist than any other group.
Obama supporters sure are unhappy over this loss.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jed Dilligan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #91
98. "No more racist than any other group"
Very telling choice of words.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #98
120. Well, what? I'm supposed to say there are NO racists in PA? And don't give ME any grief.
Unless you can say how YOU ALSO voted for the Rev. Jesse Jackson, taught Black Literature in a de facto all-white h.s., was thrilled to meet the Rev. Sharpton in a NY restaurant, and so on.

Recognizing the reality of America is not "telling", unless you define "telling" as "observant".

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jed Dilligan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #120
122. You should get out more.
The world has changed while you were in Pennsylvania hanging out with your racist friends.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakura Donating Member (660 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 11:50 PM
Response to Reply #120
125. There are racists in every state.
What's sad is that your candidate has defined a strategy that seeks their support.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakura Donating Member (660 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 06:21 PM
Response to Reply #85
89. Uh.... no. Do you jump to conclusions regularly, or is this a special, one-time-only event?
The media has characterized one demographic as Archie Bunker like. This demographic was predicted to vote for Clinton, and apparently they did. Does this mean all Clinton voters are Archie Bunker-like? No. And are some Obama voters racist? I'm sure that's true, just as some Clinton voters are elitist. Welcome to the real world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #89
93. GMAB. You posted expressly to imply racism, and now are trying to disavow that intent.
You have clearly failed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakura Donating Member (660 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #93
94. Whose governor stated that some white people were not ready to vote for a black man?
I'm not disavowing anything. What I am disagreeing with is the contention that "Some" is the same as "All." I can't speak to whether or not PA residents are more racist than any other state's residents. I certainly hope not. But again, it's moot, as that was not my point. Again, "some" is not the same as "all." Not a difficult thing to understand, really. But maybe you're deliberately trying to misunderstand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #94
118. Just as a governor is only one man with an opinion?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amelia Donating Member (261 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
97. Do you really think that you should be insulting people who are going to vote in the fall? Rude post
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakura Donating Member (660 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 11:55 PM
Response to Reply #97
126. I really don't have a problem identifying a racist as a racist.
The days when the democratic party courted racists ended a long time ago. Until recently, that was the republican's domain. But then Hilary a shameful democratic party tradition.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amelia Donating Member (261 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
99. Rude Post! You shouldn't belittle and insult people who will vote in the fall unless you can win
without them. You aren't thinking of the repurcussions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #99
102. The point of the OP is that they're going to vote for McCain. And I agree.
These are DINOs who have voted repuke in the general since Reagan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakura Donating Member (660 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 11:57 PM
Response to Reply #99
128. Don't you find it distasteful...
No, nauseating, shameful, unbelievable, that a person who wants to be president deems it necessary to court the racist vote? I think we can win without that particular demographic, thank you. And if that is who we have to take into the party to win, then we're no longer the party we once were.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marrah_G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
101. self-delete- not fucking worth it
Edited on Thu Apr-24-08 11:13 AM by Marrah_G
May your pizza delivery come soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
103. more division here
. . . she actually got a broad spectrum of votes from many segments of the population.

But, you go on . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #103
104. But she's pandering to the Archie Bunker vote
Edited on Thu Apr-24-08 11:10 AM by Armstead
Obnama as "elitist"....Nuke Iran....I love guns....Can't stand the Heat?....Obama's "Whining"......Fear Bin Laden....etc.

She's aiming for the very voters who would see Maude as a loudmouth liberal feminist...And will likely see Hillary in the same way when compared to Mccain in Nov.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #104
112. both candidates are 'pandering'. Clinton's appealing to all segments of voters.
I really don't expect for you to notice or care though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #112
123. I notice that she is a chamelion, as usual.
She is consistently whatever she thinks her audience of the moment wants her to be. "You want me to be a feminist? Okay."..."You want me to be a social conservative? Okay, I can do that too."

Moreover, even though you are a Clinton supporter, I can't fathom how you can ignore the damage she did with her tirades about Obama being an "elitist."

It was a distortion of something she basically agrees with, and it riled up peopel like me who do not see the basic truth Obama was saying as being elitist....yes he said it poorly, but do you really disagree that one big reason Democrats have been losing for so long is because we get skunked on God Guns and Gays wedge issues?

Although her intention was to damage Obama, her amplification of the Rove message in that case did damage to the very notion of Democratic liberalism as being elitist.

When one tried to play both ends against the middle, eventually one ends up eating their own tail....Okay, bad metaphor but... :)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakura Donating Member (660 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 12:00 AM
Response to Reply #112
131. So appealing to the racists in our country is okay with you?
Are you really saying that it's okay to do whatever it takes to win? Even if it means betraying what our party stands for?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakura Donating Member (660 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 11:58 PM
Response to Reply #103
129. Read the post, bigtree.
The Archie Bunker vote is one demographic out of many Hilary courted. It is you who are deciding it defines all of her supporters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClericJohnPreston Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
110. Wow
What a rational analysis your post has brought to the issues of the day.

Oh, thats right, this is the psychotic cult feeding frenzy when you have nothing to discuss. It must suck being part of a cult, huh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakura Donating Member (660 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 12:01 AM
Response to Reply #110
132. I wouldn't know...
...but you're the Cleric, aren't you? Maybe you can share what it's like in your organization.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Texas Hill Country Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
113. this is why the mid west has issues with the Dems... arrogant BS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leopolds Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #113
115. Arrogant against whom? You guys spew "cultural deficiencies" of BLACK working class constantly
People CONSTANTLY criticize working class BLACK people for their "cultural deficiencies", including wealthy blacks. It's considered acceptable discourse.

"Elites" in your frame of reference are nothing more than another word for "self-hating rich people who want to close off the working class white ethnic's INHERENT right to advance OUT of the working class, leaving the poor behind." Black people must "get in line" and wait their turn for a NEW permanent pool of unemployed workers (as prescribed by Clinton and Greenspan to counteract inflation; look it up) to emerge. Someone even more detested and acceptable to criticize.

You merely resent the fact that it's still OK for rich people, liberals
and conservatives, to criticize working class white ethnics. You feel
that working class midwestern white ethnics should NOT EXIST. They should
all be livin' the dream. Others are less deserving and can remain working
class if they "choose" but most whites no longer WANT that sort of "work".

That is the self-hating mentality. And it is not just in the Midwest, as
you well know from looking at Hillary's returns in your hated elite areas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #115
117. Bizarre.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leopolds Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #117
121. It is, isn't it? That is the self-hating Horatio Alger mentality of many striving Dems..deal with it
Many upper-class and middle-class black people have the same internalized self-hatred toward their fellow working class man, whom they consider "trifling" and unable to get ahead. It is not usually compounded by a profound dislike of a competing ethnic group, however.

Do some reading on the subject yourself, mate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakura Donating Member (660 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 12:02 AM
Response to Reply #115
133. Thanks, you've said it so much better than I could.
:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 11:56 PM
Response to Original message
127. As did Edith, Gloria, and Meat Head.
Low info voters all!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jillan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 11:59 PM
Response to Original message
130. And once again people that don't support Obama are being called racists.

You guys really need to come up with another talking point.
This racist bs is getting old....and boring....yawn!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakura Donating Member (660 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 12:03 AM
Response to Reply #130
134. No, people who are racists are being called racists.
There's a subtle difference there. A is a subset of B. A is not equal to B. I can draw you a Venn diagram if you like.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loyalsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 12:32 AM
Response to Original message
135. God'll get you for that

:nuke:

I don't see Maude aligning herself with Clinton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 12:35 AM
Response to Original message
136. This is a hilarious (and brilliant) post. K/R
Did you see this in a dream?

;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakura Donating Member (660 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 12:46 AM
Response to Reply #136
138. Thanks!
No dream-- just reality. I grew up with an Archie-- I know how he thinks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 12:49 AM
Response to Reply #138
139. Check your pms
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 06:03 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC