Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Dean Deception

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
DaveSZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 08:12 PM
Original message
The Dean Deception
I was thinking of making a contribution to Dean's new organization, but the more I read about his record as governor, the more I question what Dean truly stands for...

:(


http://www.isreview.org/issues/32/dean.shtml


Dean slashed millions of dollars from all sorts of social programs, from prescription drug benefits for Medicare recipients and heating assistance for poorer Vermonters to housing assistance funds. In defending his cuts to social programs, Dean said, "I don’t think I have to shy away from that just because I’m supposed to be a liberal Democrat."8

Throughout the 1990s, Dean’s cuts in state aid to education ($6 million), retirement funds for teachers and state employees ($7 million), health care ($4 million), welfare programs earmarked for the aged, blind and disabled ($2 million), Medicaid benefits ($1.2 million) and more, amounted to roughly $30 million. Dean claimed that the cuts were necessary because the state had no money and was burdened by a $60 million deficit.9

But during the same period, Dean found $7 million for a low-interest loan program for businesses, $30 million for a new prison in Springfield, VT, and he cut the income tax by 8 percent (equivalent to $30 million)–a move many in the legislature balked at because they didn’t feel comfortable "cutting taxes in a way that benefits the wealthiest taxpayers."10 By 2002, state investments in prisons increased by nearly 150 percent while investments in state colleges increased by only 7 percent.11

-snip-

"Dean’s attempts to run for president as an environmentalist is nothing but a fraud," said Annette Smith, director of Vermonters for a Clean Environment. "He’s destroyed the Agency of Natural Resources, he’s refused to meet with environmentalists while constantly meeting with the development community, and he’s made the permitting process one, big dysfunctional joke."34 Tom Elliot, the former political director of the Vermont Sierra Club said that "Howard Dean’s environmental record in Vermont is toxic."35 The club has never endorsed Howard Dean in his five campaigns for governor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 08:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. Oh god this again?
I would post the rebuttal to these old arguments, but I've did that way too many times during the primary.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. yes, suddenly I feel I'm on October again.... n/t
Edited on Wed Jun-23-04 08:15 PM by arcos
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 08:16 PM
Response to Original message
3. I have addressed this article on several occasions
The writers of it are either the sloppiest journalists on planet earth or utter liars.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JHBowden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 08:17 PM
Response to Original message
4. Not necessary.
Regardless of what you say is true or false, we don't need to fight over this stuff anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 08:25 PM
Response to Original message
5. Have you read what the group said about Kucinich ?
:shrug:

Here ya go. The Dennis Kucinich phenomenon - Candidate of the left?

http://www.isreview.org/issues/32/kucinich.shtml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no name no slogan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-04 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #5
60. Good point mzmolly
They lost credibility when they couldn't even get the date right for the "Prayer for America" speech (it was Feb 2002, NOT Feb 2003). Since it's the speech that got him in front of the people who drafted him to run for president, it's kind of a major thing. Oops.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-04 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #60
73. Right you are!
:hi:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 08:28 PM
Response to Original message
6. The Progressive Case For Dean ... again.
http://www.commondreams.org/views03/0811-09.htm

The article you posted contains many mistruths. Dean is a centrist, true, but he's a "fighting centrist" and that's why many lefties support him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 08:29 PM
Response to Original message
7. Dean's organization is called Democracy for America, not
Socialism for America.

So yeah, I think you made a mistake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 08:59 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Excellent point!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 08:59 PM
Response to Original message
9. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Don't worry they shall show up soon
They never miss a chance to do so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zomby Woof Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 11:44 PM
Response to Reply #9
23. they NEVER "bashed" Dean
They told the truth about him, always in reasonable and factual manners. They never got ruffled or lost their cool. They posted well-researched and fact-based pieces.

Now for me, I bashed the hell out of the worthless sonofabitch, and would do so again. :evilgrin:

I don't care much for his rotting corpse stinking up this forum again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 11:46 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. That may be funny to you.
I don't find it that humorous. He is not running, he is not a threat. I think it is wrong to post ugly things about any of our candidates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zomby Woof Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 11:49 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. And I think it is wrong to stay quiet in the face of absurdity
The relentless Dean-boosting some of you engage in does get tiresome, but I would never suggest it is 'wrong', this being a wide-open forum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-04 12:04 AM
Response to Reply #25
26. Do I hurt you when I do it?
Do I ever attack you? I will continue to "boost" him because he is the one who opened the dialogue on this evil bunch in the WH.

I have been the route of being insulted, and I have been called tiresome and idolatrous.....but you know what, Zomby? I have had so many people write me or let me know that they appreciate what I post about Dean. I have been told also that I am kind and intelligent in the way I post about issues.

One night I was told here that I never posted anything else. I promptly listed by day's posts on many topics. There was nothing else to be said.

This place got so ugly about him that I decided I would never again back down. Now, may I make a suggestion....if the post looks like it is a Dean "boost"....just avoid it.

If you like Dean bashes, then by all means take part. Whatever makes you happy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JustaSingleDad Donating Member (25 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-04 08:38 AM
Response to Reply #26
42. I really miss Dean! Are we better off now? HELL NO!
The "TRUST US, WE KNOW BETTER" cabal, cut Dean out, and left us with an empty suit, without a beating heart. Sorry, I will vote for anyone we end up with, but there is no enthusiasm in it for me.. Many will disagree this is just my opinion..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guaranteed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-04 12:06 AM
Response to Reply #25
27. What is it about him, exactly, that you don't like?
Is it his righteousness? By which I mean, the fact that he's right all the time, and has the nerve to speak up?

Do you prefer more of the spineless politico types?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-04 12:09 AM
Response to Reply #27
28. Shhh....hh...it is the "boosts" we give him.
It is not based on the person or his merits....he does not like the boosting we do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zomby Woof Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-04 08:01 PM
Response to Reply #27
80. because he is right-center Repuke
He is as much a Democrat as Lieberman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donating Member ( posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-04 08:19 AM
Response to Reply #25
41. It is so -o-o stupid to boost Democrats, isn't it?
Edited on Thu Jun-24-04 08:19 AM by 56kid
:wtf:
 Add to my Journal Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zomby Woof Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-04 08:03 PM
Response to Reply #41
81. Dean is a shitty Dem
About as bad as Lieberman. It cracks me up to witness such mass self-deception about his 'populism' and 'grassroots'. But hey, I never said you all don't have the right to self-delusion, for this is America...

The bitterness of his failed campaign will never die.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-04 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #81
86. Here is quote from Dean to make you feel better.
“The press is all writing about Dean is the big liberal of the race,” said Dean at a Washington fund-raiser in March. “Well, if being a liberal is balancing the budget that's fine with me. And I'll bet it's fine with most Americans. If being a liberal is joining Canada and Britain and France and Germany and Japan and Italy and Israel in having universal health insurance for all of its citizens, then you may call me what you want.” ~ Howard Dean.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Capn Sunshine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-04 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #25
57. I'm glad that there is some growth occuring
Edited on Thu Jun-24-04 12:38 PM by Capn Sunshine
We've gone from "traitorous scum" to "not wrong". What I want to know is how a tireless campaigner for Kerry and former presidential candidate who is singlehandedly sparking the otherwise moribund crowds at Kerry Rallies earned such contempt as to be referred to as a stinking corpse, when the utter intellectual bankruptcy of such a position is apparent to all. I doubt that there's any of that axe left to grind, yet the stubs and shards of it are being heaped upon the stone yet again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ibegurpard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-04 07:00 PM
Response to Reply #57
78. Some rude Dean supporter hurt his feelings at some point?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-04 07:59 PM
Response to Reply #78
79. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-04 08:06 PM
Response to Reply #79
84. "rank idiocy" New one, ZW.
That is a good one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XanaDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-04 12:22 AM
Response to Reply #23
31. Hi!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zomby Woof Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-04 08:03 PM
Response to Reply #31
82. hey there!
They all came crawling back to disrupt and spam, it seems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-04 06:46 AM
Response to Reply #23
37. Baldly false
Both of those posters got caught mistating facts on numerous occasions. Nick claimed that Dean reinstituted the death penalty in Vermont (Vermont doesn't have the death penalty), jailed a person for contempt of court (only judges can do that), raised the sales tax (he had kept it level), increased property taxes (he had cut them), and the list goes on. BLM repeatedly claimed that Gary Hart said Dean was unfit to be President but never sited a quote, claimed Dean had endorsed Jeffords when he hadn't, claimed Dean had conducted a push poll when her link was at best ambiguous, claimed a link on Hart had been scrubbed in some sort of Dean inspired plot when I found it with one search, and the list goes on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ibegurpard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-04 12:34 AM
Response to Reply #9
33. Their work is done
Don't see them around much anymore, do you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lefty Pragmatist Donating Member (430 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 09:10 PM
Response to Original message
11. "We've got a bigger problem now."
Cmon, kids, keep your eyes on da prize.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DFLforever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 09:49 PM
Response to Original message
12. Then don't make a contribution.
I'm sure DFA will survive without your donation and confusion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
69KV Donating Member (444 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 09:52 PM
Response to Original message
13. The International Socialist Review?
Should have been a Trotskyite warning on that link :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 09:54 PM
Response to Original message
14. I have ZERO respect for your source... why not quote NewsMax?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ibegurpard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-04 12:33 AM
Response to Reply #14
32. Oh please
It came in quite handy when kneecapping Dean was the order of the day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-04 04:48 AM
Response to Reply #32
36. So?
I didn't accept a socialist website editorial then and I don't now.

Sites like that are the left's NewsMax.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bitchkitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-26-04 08:05 AM
Response to Reply #36
98. Why?
Something wrong with being a socialist?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-26-04 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #98
99. socialists have their own agenda like every political group does
Edited on Sat Jun-26-04 10:41 AM by wyldwolf
So of course they're going spin or mislead regarding a candidate who doesn't support them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 09:54 PM
Response to Original message
15. Here is a very fair article from 2002 to see his thinking.
He was working with a Republican legislature who did NOT want to raise taxes in a crisis. Dean had raised the limit on who could qualify, and now he was being forced into decisions.
Another article is forthcoming.

http://rutlandherald.com/hdean/41141

SNIP..."MONTPELIER — Gov. Howard Dean took office in 1991 in the middle of a budget crisis, and he drew on that experience Tuesday when he presented a new state budget designed to pull Vermont through the current economic slowdown."

SNIP..."According to the current estimates, Dean told lawmakers, Vermont will have to make do with nearly $70 million less than it thought it would have for next year. The budget Dean presented did not include any tax increases. However, he made it clear to lawmakers that they will have to make some painful cuts if they do not find new revenues.

The governor has been urging the Legislature to increase the tax on cigarettes to help cover the growing cost of health care programs that Vermont has expanded in recent years. Lawmakers balked at his request last year, so this year Dean recommended cuts in those programs in order to keep his proposed budget in balance....."

They refused to raise taxes, so he presented a deal.

Your post is really all we need right now to help ease tensions. Thanks so much. Dean must be doing something right to need to be attacked again.







Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 09:56 PM
Response to Original message
16. I've never seen *this* before
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 10:11 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. Could you clarify the cryptic *this*? Thanks.
?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 10:27 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. This = the link posted
It was posted about forty billion times on this forum over the course of the past few months. Pretty straightforward.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 10:32 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. I thought you meant that. Thanks.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 10:01 PM
Response to Original message
17. Another article about the Medicaid. Makes good sense if you research.
http://rutlandherald.com/hdean/41121

SNIP...."In an effort to curb costs in a rapidly expanding part of the social services budget, Dean is proposing to require many people who got coverage under his expansions of Medicaid programs to pay for a greater share of their health care.

Medicaid is the state-run program that uses both state and federal money to provide benefits to the poor and disabled. Over the past several years Dean has expanded the programs by allowing participation by Vermonters with incomes higher than the federal guidelines."

SNIP..."That’s what occurs when the state and federal government don’t pay enough to hospitals and doctors to cover the cost of treating patients on Medicaid and Medicare, the health care program for the elderly. Doctors and hospitals must then charge more to patients with insurance coverage, driving up insurance costs."

Remember he was working with lawmakers who refused to raise taxes for social programs. Think about it....think about the options. He had tried to help those who had fallen through the cracks, and he is getting screwed for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTLawGuy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 10:15 PM
Response to Original message
19. International Socialist Review???
NEXT!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 10:38 PM
Response to Original message
22. Did Dean make the news today or something...needed to be bashed?
Edited on Wed Jun-23-04 10:38 PM by madfloridian
You know he is not running anymore. He is working his butt off for Kerry and the Democrats 6 days a week, and traveling the 7th. I just get so mad when people start this again.

So...did he make a difference today? Is that it?

There is another side to the Sierra Club stuff, and I am too tired tonight to find my records and post them. Maybe someone else could cover that issue.

Hey, he is not even in the running for VP....so fight over the ones who are, OK?

This is all so silly and stupid. Oh, and check out the two articles I posted about the budget and Medicaid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-04 12:11 AM
Response to Original message
29. Hope someone reads the two articles I posted above.
They show how Dean did his best to work with the GOP lawmakers who never wanted to raise taxes....only cut them.

They explain a lot. I have lots more, but that is for an earlier time in the evening.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guaranteed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-04 12:13 AM
Response to Original message
30. This piece should be titled "The Price of a Balanced Budget."
11 years in a row. One HELL of an accomplishment in itself, particularly through the recession toward the end.

The worst thing about what he did were the tax cuts- although I'd like to see how the numbers stacked up as far as the lower/middle classes vs. the upper class.

As far as his not being an environmentalist, to be honest with you, I couldn't give less of a shit. I knew full well that the man is a moderate. He makes up for that by speaking up and holding strong to what he believes in. It doesn't do you much good to be a liberal, which Dean IS, if you jump ship every time things get hot, especially when it comes to really big issues, such as the war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Still_Loves_John Donating Member (688 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-04 12:57 AM
Response to Original message
34. I never really understood the Dean thing
Dean was never one of the most liberal candidates, even among the more mainstream ones. I think the reason that anyone was attracted to him was because he was angry and would insult Bush, which helped channel lots of the anger that Democrats were feeling. That's why I never liked Dean-he was nothing but fuming, no real liberalism.

Then again, he lost, and we should stop beating a dead horse. I think some of us just have resentment left over from when Dean was on top and we had to deal with his supporters all the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-04 01:03 AM
Response to Reply #34
35. I will continue to post news about him as a Democrat.
Unless the moderators say we can no longer post about Dean. Then they will have to stop letting folks post about anyone other than the nominee and VP choice. That could get very boring.

You do not have to read the posts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seaglass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-04 07:16 AM
Response to Reply #34
38. I can understand it, he wasn't a bad guy and he filled a need for
some, he just wasn't someone I would want as a president - though of course I would have voted for him over the current resident. I won't get into my thoughts on some of his supporters.

This Dean stuff is just getting really boring, pro and con. I have taken MFs advice to ZW, I rarely click on the posts anymore, they sink fast enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-04 07:43 AM
Response to Reply #38
39. so how did you come to read this?
After all it was pretty clearly a thread about Dean. The Dean deception or did you think it was Jimmy Dean or John Dean?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seaglass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-04 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #39
56. I assume you know the difference between rarely and never?
Sometimes my resistance weakens but for the most part I've done pretty good avoiding the threads. Thanks for your concern.

And yes, I do return to threads that I post on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-26-04 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #56
100. I just find it odd that someone who rarely reads these threads
would have searched this out. Somehow I suspect that if I decided to search we would have to get into a discussion of the meaning of rare.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-04 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #38
59. Yes, he did fill a "need for some." A need for truth and real words.
QUOTE"This Dean stuff is just getting really boring, pro and con."

The DLC/DNC word games and spin get tiring after a while. That was subtle putdown....the "need" thing. Cute.

Just avoid the threads, as you say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-04 07:58 AM
Response to Original message
40. then don't make your donation
I guess they will get along without you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-04 10:09 AM
Response to Original message
43. You just now figured out he's a moderate?
The entire campaign was based on Dean letting many of his supporters think he is a liberal, but in fact he never was.

The same thing is happening with his new organization. I heard Dean on air america radio say his new organization will support moderates and maybe some who aren't Democrats. So, why do people keep describing this as an organization to support progressive candidates? It isn't! I don't know if Dean's followers are just too stubborn to reject their false impression of Dean as a progressive, or if the people who work for Dean are still busy sending out false signals to liberals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-04 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #43
44. He repeatedly stated he wasn't a liberal
you are telling stories when you say he didn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-04 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #44
46. Except when he was in front of liberal groups
Did he sound moderate at the Take Back America conference last year, or in front of any other liberal group? No. I respected Lieberman more because Lieberman would go in front of a union audience and defend his stance on Free Trade. Dean just changed his stance and tried to be all things to all people.

If Dean was so up front about not being a liberal, then why did so many of his supporters think he was a liberal fighting against the DLC Democrats?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-04 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #46
47. that is baldly false
I have heard his speak several times, all on TV admittedly, but on every single occasion without any exception he has stated he wasn't a liberal. Every single last occassion without exception.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-04 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #47
49. You're dreaming and I'll prove I'm right
Here is a link to his speech at the Take Back America conference in 2003.

http://www.ourfuture.org/docUploads/dean_062303_131529.pdf

It was a huge and important audience of liberals in the early part of the primary. Nowhere does Dean call himself moderate or conservative. He does start the speech by mentioning Paul Wellstone and using his line about being from the democratic wing of the Democratic Party. Wellstone used that to indicate he was a liberal and Dean used the same line to give the same impression. Progressive Democrats already knew that line and they knew what it meant. If Dean is a moderate it was a blatant act of deception to repeat that line over and over again during the primary, which he did.

On page 2 he mentions lobbyists referring to him as "this progressive Democrat." Dean does not deny or correct that assertion.

He later criticizes the DLC for trying to be like Republicans, which obviously implies Dean will be something other than a moderate DLCer like he used to be.

Dean sounds very liberal throughout this speech. If you tell me the man who gave that speech was a moderate then I'm telling you the man who gave that speech was a FAKE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-04 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #49
52. All of his speeches are still up at C-Span.
I would like to know your definition of "liberal" and "republican". Hate to tell you but you are sounding very strange about liberal being bad or something.

Yes, he did call the DLC the Republican wing.....and they are.

I know that speech, he gives full credit to the Wellstones, and he sounds like a thinking man who knows his party has screwed up royally.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Still_Loves_John Donating Member (688 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-04 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #52
64. Umm...do you not understand his argument at all?
"I would like to know your definition of "liberal" and "republican". Hate to tell you but you are sounding very strange about liberal being bad or something.
Yes, he did call the DLC the Republican wing.....and they are.
"

He's not attacking Dean for being liberal, or for fighting the DLC. He's attacking Dean for PRETENDING to be liberal when he was just as conservative, if not more so, than the rest of the candidates. He refrenced the DLC because Dean pretended to be crusading against them when, ideologically, he had very few differences with them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-04 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #64
65. Dean WAS DLC when he was governor. Media called him liberal.
I am not stupid, I do understand what the poster is doing in reference to Dean's stances. He is NOT well-informed on Dean's stances on all issues, and he is speaking things that were parroted around here during the primaries.

Dean is the ONLY candidate aside from Kucinich who made it clear he opposes our nation's new policy of remapping the middle east and preemptively attacking nations. Dean called them out on the war vote and their ties to corporations. Those were his two main issues. They are also mine.

Has Kerry come out against imperialism? No. Did Clark? No, he did not. Edwards' office made it clear to me he is not against remapping the middle east.

Did you see my post that it was the MEDIA who has called Dean liberal? Did you see that?? Dean only called himself a "social liberal." If you find proof of Dean's masquerading as a liberal, I will concede. HOWEVER, be sure it is Dean pretending...not just another candidate or the media doing it.

"Since the time of Thomas Paine and John Adams, our founders implored that we were not to be the new Rome. We are not to conquer and suppress other nations to submit to our will. We were to inspire them."
Howard Dean, 2003


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Still_Loves_John Donating Member (688 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-04 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #65
67. But see, you're misrepresenting his argument again
He is not attacking Dean for being liberal. He is attacking Dean for allowing people to believe he was a liberal when he wasn't. In your posts you seem to be defending against a guy saying Dean was too liberal, but thats not what he's saying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-04 04:40 PM
Response to Reply #67
68. Please read this, and then ask the poster to prove what he says.
Edited on Thu Jun-24-04 04:44 PM by madfloridian
Please have the poster you are defending show me where Dean allows himself to be thought of falsely. People say it all the time, but they never prove it. He is for change, both leftish and rightish, and I think people should prove when they say something.

Read this from mzmolly's post:
“The press is all writing about Dean is the big liberal of the race,” said Dean at a Washington fund-raiser in March. “Well, if being a liberal is balancing the budget that's fine with me. And I'll bet it's fine with most Americans. If being a liberal is joining Canada and Britain and France and Germany and Japan and Italy and Israel in having universal health insurance for all of its citizens, then you may call me what you want.” Howard Dean.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Still_Loves_John Donating Member (688 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-04 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #68
70. he has given you evidence!
He used the "Democratic wing" line all the time, frequently cited Paul Wellstone, and called his other opponents "Bush-lite."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-04 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #70
71. Right....the DLC is more Republican.
Paul Wellstone was a progressive for change, he was not known as a liberal....as a progressive. Dean is forming his organization on supporting progressive Democrats.

I do not understand your obsession with labeling this guy. He is not to be labeled.

I think you two do need to do more research on Dean if you are going attack him. He is conservative, moderate, progressive, and liberal...all rolled into one.

So am I, and so is my husband. This "liberal" deal which the media gave him is getting out of control on these posts.

“The press is all writing about Dean is the big liberal of the race,” said Dean at a Washington fund-raiser in March. “Well, if being a liberal is balancing the budget that's fine with me. And I'll bet it's fine with most Americans. If being a liberal is joining Canada and Britain and France and Germany and Japan and Italy and Israel in having universal health insurance for all of its citizens, then you may call me what you want.” ~ Howard Dean.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Still_Loves_John Donating Member (688 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-04 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #71
75. arg
"Right....the DLC is more Republican."

I don't even understand what you mean by this.

"Paul Wellstone was a progressive for change, he was not known as a liberal....as a progressive. "

Don't play with semantics--progressive and liberal are interchangable.

And you didn't respond to any of my points. Someone who calls his opponents Bush lite and says he's from the Democratic wing of the Democratic Party is obviously trying to paint themselves as liberal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-04 05:58 PM
Response to Reply #75
76. No, you are playing word games.
I have responded. Read my posts. I responded that Dean did not paint himself as liberal...others did.

Have you read the DLC site? It is www.ndol.com
Read it. Read the PPI which is part of them...they share the same office and phone, they are one.

Read it. The members themselves may not all be so conservative, but the founders were. They began as a corporately funded think tank, not people oriented. The leaders still are. Al From and Will Marshall are 100% for the Iraq war.

You really are into this Dean stuff, this anti-Dean stuff. You are trying to use the word liberal, which Democrats should embrace, to smear a good man. You are stretching this out by saying I am not responding to the other guy, so why don't you let him speak for himself.

Read what Dean said:
“The press is all writing about Dean is the big liberal of the race,” said Dean at a Washington fund-raiser in March. “Well, if being a liberal is balancing the budget that's fine with me. And I'll bet it's fine with most Americans. If being a liberal is joining Canada and Britain and France and Germany and Japan and Italy and Israel in having universal health insurance for all of its citizens, then you may call me what you want.”~ Howard Dean.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dansolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-26-04 01:23 AM
Response to Reply #75
95. You should read up on Paul Wellstone
People who like to attack Dean always take Paul Wellstone's quote out of context. Paul Wellstone, when he described himself as from the "Democratic wing of the Democratic Party", was NOT talking about being a liberal. He was complaining about the fact that the Democrats were becoming beholden to the same monied interests that were supporting the Republicans. Dean had it correct. The problem was with all of the liberals who really don't have a clue about what Paul Wellstone was fighting for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-26-04 01:29 AM
Response to Reply #95
96. They wanted us to be proud to be Democrats again.
Dean once said that if the party called him liberal, then they truly had moved too far to the right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no name no slogan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-26-04 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #71
101. No, Paul was known as a LIBERAL, especially at home in MN
Paul invoked the names of HHH and FDR all the time on the campaign trail. He was not afraid to be called a liberal, and a progressive. I worked on a couple of his campaigns and he was more than happy to attach himself to the liberal legacy of Hubert Humphrey, JFK and others.

As a matter of fact, his vanquished 1990 opponent ran against him in 1996 and tried to paint him as "ultra-liberal Paul Wellstone". It probably worked too, but then Paul beat him by an even larger margin than in 1990.

Paul was both a liberal and a progressive. It is possible to be both.

However, I still don't understand the purpose of this thread. I thought everybody knew this stuff about Dean already. And at this point, who the hell really cares?

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-04 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #49
69. How do "liberals" sound? Like they are telling the truth?
Dean is a progressive democrat. Look up the meaning. It does not matter at all to me whether you like him or any of us. It matters that when you say things like this, you use correct terminology and not misinterpret progressive.

I do not fit a political pattern, and I have never fit one. I resent being boxed and labeled, as I am a thinking person who is NOT tied to party by ideology.

That is why my hubby and I supported and still support Dean/DFA. He does not think in labels and boxes.

This is exactly why so many Dean supporters are struggling about voting Democrat. Because many of them were not to begin with nor are they now. I was, and I guess I still am.... maybe. That is up to our nominee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-04 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #46
50. I just made an offer to you to give you a link to a site.
Check my post above. Take time to read what he is about, what he says, and not just spout rhetoric which you have heard others say.

Most of his supporters know what he stands for, and all of us are familiar with his history of governing as a centrist in VT.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-04 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #50
55. Half the Dean supporters I talked to insisted he's a liberal
the other half insist all his supporters know he's not. Just read through the posts on this topic and you'll see I'm right. Dean was happy to give the impression he was liberal to liberals during the primary, and the take back america speech is a good example of that.

I did research Dean early on. That's why I didn't support him when many of my progressive friends did because they were led to believe that Dean represented their progressive ideals. The fact that Dean's supporters have so many different ideas about what Dean is and believes is an indication of how the campaign message was delivered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-04 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #55
58. Please point to the posts where someone invokes the liberal tag.
Boy, are you falling for the Republican Noise Machine labels.

I am reading the book right now, and I thought I knew a lot. I did not realize how deeply ingrained this word hatred it. You need to read it or reread it.

There is nothing wrong with the word liberal anyway. One can be several things at once, though. Quit falling for the spin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-04 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #43
45. Oh, good grief. In many interviews he said was a fiscal conservative.
And that he was for socially "liberal" causes. Before you start this bashing, please review his speeches and comments and transcripts.

There are sites which have them linked all the way back to last year.

Get to know someone's stances before you bash.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-04 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #45
48. I wish more of his supporters reviewed that
If its so obvious that Dean wasn't liberal why do we STILL have many people on DU insisting that Dean was holding up the liberal wing of the party. Why did he steal Paul Wellstone's line about being from the democratic wing of the party and attack the moderates in the DLC?

Dean stopped making comments about being moderate or a fiscal conservative for several months of the campaign, while he used the language of a progressive to get progressive voters. I did notice a lot of articles start to say he was a moderate again in December when Dean started moving back to the middle. After that things went downhill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-04 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #48
51. The media called him a liberal, and he IS socially a liberal.
The media defined him completely and thoroughly while building him up until they helped bring him down.

I never agree with any politician on everything, but I despise to see them being misrepresented.

His group works closely with the Wellstone foundation, and he did NOT steal Wellstone's line. He gave him credit when he used it.

Everyone now is spouting Dean's words, and they do not give credit.

This is all so silly. Let's stop it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-04 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #48
53. Who says that consistently?
Who is it here that calls Dean a liberal and says he is holding up the liberal wing? I have not seen that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donating Member ( posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-04 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #48
54. because the Democratic party isn't all that liberal
Edited on Thu Jun-24-04 11:18 AM by 56kid
so it's possible to not be a liberal and be the liberal part of the Democratic party?

To give an example of what I'm thinking of.
Boulder Colorado thinks of itself as being a liberal place.
Yet some of the positions that they think are liberal end up not being so.
There is a huge open space movement to keep the wild in the city.
Nice tree-hugging, liberal environmentalist position.
Right?
Wrong.
As a direct result of this position, zoning laws are in place that keep the rents high, that keep low-income housing from being built.
As a result, the dishwashers and a lot of the poor (a large percentage of who are Mexican immigrants) end up living 20 miles away in Longmont where they can afford the rent and they commute to work.

Same kind of thing happens in NYC.
NYC liberal city, yet still quite stratified.
 Add to my Journal Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-04 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #54
61. Dishwashers? Heck, try some university faculty and staff.
Thirty to fifty grand a year doesn't buy much house in Boulder. ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donating Member ( posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-04 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #61
62. LOL ! well,I haven't lived there for about 8 years
Edited on Thu Jun-24-04 03:10 PM by 56kid
not surprised to hear it's gotten worse.
 Add to my Journal Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-04 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #48
91. Dean used that line because he believes in democracy.
He believes that the American people "have the power" to determine their own government.

A lot of people made fun of him for that.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-04 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #43
63. "Progressive"
Though I don't think Dean (as an independent man) can be boxed in or labeled:

According to the dictionary progressive means:

Moving forward; advancing.

Proceeding in steps; continuing steadily by increments: progressive change.

Promoting or favoring progress toward better conditions or new policies, ideas, or methods: a progressive politician; progressive business leadership.

Progressive Of or relating to a Progressive Party: the Progressive platform of 1924.

n.

A person who actively favors or strives for progress toward better conditions, as in society or government.


Sorry he doesn't meet *your* definition of progressive, but he meets mine and that of websters dictionary :hi:

I always refer to Dean as a *fighting centrist* and a populist progressive. Though I consider myself a liberal/progressive, I am also pragmatic. I like Dean's pragmatic/balanced approach to Government. Dean managed to cut budgets in Vermont while increasing many social programs. He was elected 5 times in Vermont (a liberal state) to Govern. I only regret that he wont be our next President.

Here are the goals for Democracy For America:

To have strong, sustained grassroots involvement in the democratic process.

To promote an America where candidates and office holders tell the truth about policy choices and stand up for what they believe. The era when politicians equivocate about matters as fundamental as war and peace must end.

To fight against the influence and agenda of the two pillars of George W. Bush's Washington: the far right-wing and their radical, divisive policies, and the selfish special interests who for too long have dominated politics.

To fight for progressive policies like health care for all; investment in children; equal rights under law; fiscal responsibility; and a national security policy that makes America stronger by advancing progressive values.


What *liberals* have said:

“Governor Dean's 12-year record in the Statehouse was not liberal, conservative or elitist,” said Leahy. “He inherited a deficit, balanced the budget, pinched pennies, provided health care to all Vermont's children, protected the environment and created jobs.”

The endorsements from Leahy and Jeffords aren't likely to help Dean shed the liberal label, though. The two are among the most liberal members of the Senate and are heroes among liberals.



“The press is all writing about Dean is the big liberal of the race,” said Dean at a Washington fund-raiser in March. “Well, if being a liberal is balancing the budget that's fine with me. And I'll bet it's fine with most Americans. If being a liberal is joining Canada and Britain and France and Germany and Japan and Italy and Israel in having universal health insurance for all of its citizens, then you may call me what you want.” i ~ Howard Dean.

Call Dean what you like. He's changing American politics for the better. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-04 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #63
66. I hate the labeling of Dean and his supporters! You are right. Change!
We are a wide mix of Democrats, Greens, Republicans, and Independents. We like one thing....someone to be honest and say the "emperor has no clothes" "he is not telling you the truth."

That is what he and we are about, and I am tired of being fun of and will not allow it to happen unchallenged.

Kerry and the others made fun of Dean when he said we were no safer with Saddam captured. Kerry said he was not fit to be president. Well, well, my friends....guess who was right.

How true:
“The press is all writing about Dean is the big liberal of the race,” said Dean at a Washington fund-raiser in March. “Well, if being a liberal is balancing the budget that's fine with me. And I'll bet it's fine with most Americans. If being a liberal is joining Canada and Britain and France and Germany and Japan and Italy and Israel in having universal health insurance for all of its citizens, then you may call me what you want.” ~ Howard Dean.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-04 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #66
72. You are spot on as usual!
"Kerry and the others made fun of Dean when he said we were no safer with Saddam captured. Kerry said he was not fit to be president. Well, well, my friends....guess who was right."

Seems even the *mainstream* is saying this NOW. *sigh*

:hi:

Man I love that bumpersticker!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-04 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #72
77. Should I find the original statement or leave it alone?
I may have to make good on my own research and post about others negatively...you think? It is so unclassy to make fun of our Democrats....but they said Dean was NOT fit to be president because he said we were no safer with Saddam captured...

And they are criticizing Dean?? Oh, my!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-04 08:03 PM
Response to Reply #77
83. I say dig it up incase it's needed.
;)

Heck, if your inclined, dig it up anyway. I'd love to see it. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-04 08:08 PM
Response to Reply #83
85. Ok dokey......I see we just got a new label above.
"rank idiots."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-04 08:26 PM
Response to Reply #85
87. At times like this, we must consider the source.
*angry liberal* *rank idiots* it's all the same.

:hurts: CRAP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-04 09:37 AM
Response to Reply #72
88. Americans agree with Dean now
The poll also found that more than half say the Iraq war has made the United States less safe from terrorism. Only a third said it made this country safer.

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story2&u=/ap/20040625/ap_on_re_us/iraq_poll

Dean was ahead of the curve and it looks like the more Dean is proved right, the more defensive others get.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-04 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #88
92. There's that, yes. He was right. But people also don't like
change, and DFA is firing up some grassroots action now at local and state levels.

Real democracy is scary :scared: to some people. They don't like to be in charge of their own destinies; it's so much easier to select some strong man to "take care" of them--somebody who fits into the right boxes, uses the familiar terms, and prints the right labels.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no name no slogan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-26-04 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #63
102. Dean's a Commie. Rush said so.
(joking of course!) :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-04 05:29 PM
Response to Original message
74. Hey Wher'd the OP Go!? Imagine that ... he left.
:freak: Hmmm, crawled unda' a rock perhaps? :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Debi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-04 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
89. Brought to you by the Kerry for President campaign
Just in case the enthusiasm for Howard Dean hasn't died yet.....

"Hey, if you didn't support John Kerry in the primaries we will crush you like a bug" stated one Kerry staff member.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JNelson6563 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-04 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
90. Talk about late to the party!
*snicker* We already played this one out, you musta missed it. *yawn*

Got any other good games?

Julie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alex146 Donating Member (556 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-04 07:19 PM
Response to Original message
93. his state was in a budget disaster what would u do?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-04 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #93
94. And a GOP legislature...I posted two good articles near the top.
They explain it well.
Thanks for the response.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bitchkitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-26-04 08:00 AM
Response to Original message
97. This was boring back then, now it's just stupid.
Why don't you guys just let it go?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maxanne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-26-04 04:41 PM
Response to Original message
103. pssst DaveSZ
Edited on Sat Jun-26-04 04:42 PM by maxanne
Dean lost the nomination. He's not going to be president. You can stop the slagging, any time.

It is absolutely hilarious that this kind of regurgitation keeps getting recycled. Dean must really scare the shit out of a lot of folks, seein' as how he ain't the nominee. Howard Dean seems to be to the Democrats what Bill Clinton's penis is to the right wing.

Unfuckingbelievable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 01:20 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC