Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

‘Get your ass out’

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 08:12 AM
Original message
‘Get your ass out’
Members of the Congressional Black Caucus (CBC) had a harsh and simple message yesterday for independent presidential candidate Ralph Nader: “Get your ass out.”

Rep. Carolyn Kilpatrick (D-Mich.) made that comment to the man many Democrats blamed for putting Bush in the White House, according to several sources in the closed-door meeting.

“Many of us told him that,” said Rep. Major Owens (D-N.Y.). But Nader appeared unwilling to heed the CBC’s advice, causing many black lawmakers to express their frustration.

“The guy’s got a Messiah complex,” said Rep. Al Wynn (D-Md.). “He’s all over the park on why he wants to run. He gives you all kinds of reasons, none of which match the rationale of his candidacy.”

more: http://nationaljournal.com/pubs/hotline/extra/wakeupcall/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Stuckinthebush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
1. Nader is all over the park on why he is running
When the CBC jumps on you and you still don't budge, then you aren't listening. The CBC has members who tell it straight. If Nader didn't hear them, then he won't hear anyone.

Frankly, I don't think Nader will be a problem for the Democrats. Too many people know what is at stake in this election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. But some states may be close
He may not have to get 3% to affect the outcome of some states. In 2000 Bush won Florida by 0.01% and Gore won Oregon by 0.4%.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
3. This is hilarious! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
4. As I posted yesterday, don't fool with the CBC, esp. the women!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
5. That's because poor minorities are the most effected group of people
Edited on Wed Jun-23-04 12:57 PM by mzmolly
when the R's take office.

WHO IS DYING IN DISPROPORTINATE NUMBERS IN AN ILLEGITIMATE WAR?!
WHO IS SUFFERING MORE POVERTY/CRIME/EDUCATIONAL CUTS?!
WHO IS THE BRUNT OF ENVIRONMENTAL RACISM?!

Yes Ralph ... GET YOUR ASS OUT! Leave the Green Party to those within the party Mr. Nader, like the honorable David Cobb.

This sums up Nader nicely.

“The guy’s got a Messiah complex,” said Rep. Al Wynn (D-Md.). “He’s all over the park on why he wants to run. He gives you all kinds of reasons, none of which match the rationale of his candidacy.” EXACTLY MR. WYNN.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ishoutandscream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Exactly. African-Americans have a lot more to lose with Bush winning
And Nader is a threat. Thank god for the CBC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
6. Adding, this makes for a great bumper sticker! "Ralph, Get Your Ass Out"
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spooky3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
7. I'm glad they were blunt, but I am sure that Nader has convinced
Edited on Wed Jun-23-04 01:09 PM by spooky3
himself that if he doesn't stay in, then the Democrats will refuse to listen to what he considers the more progressive voices in the party. He may be partially correct. However, the natural consequences of his behavior in 2000 and perhaps in 2004 are that progressives will have no power whatsoever, as they will not hold the WH or either house.

He already has convinced himself that the following mathematical reality does not exist and can't recur in 2004 (in FL or elsewhere):

# of votes that would have beaten Bush in Florida =

# of votes Gore received and were counted

plus

(# of votes Gore received and weren't counted

OR

# of votes of people disenfranchised illegally by Kathleen Harris, most of whom would have voted for Gore

OR

# of votes that went to Nader that would have otherwise gone to the Democrat if Nader were not on the ticket).

He recognizes only the first two of the "plusses" and refuses to acknowledge that the third would have put Gore over the top--all the while making fun of Democrats for "not understanding math". I can't believe he is so stupid that he is unable to understand basic addition, so I have to chalk it up to blind ego.

It is really a shame that so many contributions that he has made on behalf of consumers and others will always be overshadowed by his childish unwillingness to accept compromises to get some of what he wants acomplished, when the alternatives are far, far worse.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-04 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. So true!
"It is really a shame that so many contributions that he has made on behalf of consumers and others will always be overshadowed by his childish unwillingness to accept compromises to get some of what he wants acomplished, when the alternatives are far, far worse."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC