|
Edited on Thu Apr-10-08 10:37 AM by nomad1776
Suppose for the sake of arguement, we accept the premise that Hillary's campaign has been hurt by sexist attitudes. Now one would have to think that there are less sexists attitudes in the Democratic party subset, than there is in the Country as a whole. That being the case, what chance does Hillary have of winning the general election? After all it's a safe bet the sexism problems will get worse, not better.
Seems to me those Hillary supporters that are crying "sexism" are also saying that their candidate has no chance of winning in November. So why would the Dems want to nominate someone that has no chance? Is making a stand for equal gender rights, more important than reclaiming the Country from the Republicans that have and are still ruining it?
So those that like to indulge in the sexism victim role, might want to think twice about doing so. You are all but saying your candidate is unelectable.
|