Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

This article shows how unsafe we are under George W. Bush

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
genius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-04 02:58 PM
Original message
This article shows how unsafe we are under George W. Bush
Edited on Fri Jun-04-04 03:12 PM by genius
Natasha really socks it to Bush and the war-mongers in her latest article in Debateusa.com. In the last paragraph, she also encourages Kerry to support Hugo Chavez. BTW, if you look at the other articles in Debateusa, you'll notice that the liberal writers seem to be in a minority there (though I think the guy who runs it is a Democrat.) Maybe her work will help encourage some of the more conservative readers of that site to switch.

http://debateusa.com/featured/hull_richter.htm

Which Government Will Be Next?
By Natasha, age 12

On September 11, 2001, America had an awful catastrophe. We knew immediately just who was to blame. Our President claimed to have no idea it was going to happen just the day before. (Interestingly, before the attacks, then-San Francisco Mayor Willie Brown was warned not to fly, employees of certain businesses in the World Trade Center were told not to report to work on 9-11, an investment firm with CIA connections sold “put” options on American and United Airlines, and, through foresightedness, records were moved out of the section of the Pentagon that was later hit on 9-11.) The authority to scramble the jets had been vested solely with Donald Rumsfeld less than four months prior to 9-11 but warnings of impending terrorist attacks from leaders of 12 countries and planes going off course for long periods of time was apparently not sufficient reason for Rumsfeld to act to stop the impending tragedy. After all, he and George W. Bush had no idea what was about to happen until after it happened

Yet immediately after the tragedy, it was known that the villain was Osama Bin Laden (whom we still haven't caught). Not only did we know the identity of the man, whose existence had been of minimal interest in terms of national security to Bush the day before, but where he was from, his whole background and that suddenly he was dangerous. We also knew the identities of 19 of the hijackers, something we supposedly did not know when they boarded the plane earlier that morning. (Let’s forget about the fact that at least seven of the “hijackers” whom our government claimed perished on those planes have been photographed alive since 9-11.) Our government also knew that Osama was in Afghanistan. Apparently he had not been a stranger to the CIA. On July 11, 2001, CIA agent Larry Mitchell visited bin Laden in an American hospital in France. Though the Bush administration had allowed bin Laden to leave the American hospital and return to Afghanistan, it did not keep track of a terrorist attack numerous individuals had told the Bush administration bin Laden was planning.

Suddenly, on 9-11, it became a priority to actually stop bin Laden. To the Bush administration, the bombing of the U.S.S. Cole suddenly had become more than just a handshake. It was a prelude to a major event in this country. Bin Laden had become enemy number 1. So of course, right after the 9-11 attacks, Bush had to arrange to have the bin Laden family flown out of the country by private plane. What else would any leader do with potential witnesses and perpetrators of the worst terrorist attack in American history? Of course, ordinary Americans (whose names were not bin Laden) were grounded to make the airways safer.

...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
CO Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-04 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. This Article Also Shows...
...how well-informed and intelligent one 12-year-old girl is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-04 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
2. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 07:50 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC