Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Gay City News Endorses Obama

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
NorthCarolina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 09:43 AM
Original message
Gay City News Endorses Obama

http://gaycitynews.com/site/index.cfm?newsid=19249408&B...


Gay City News
New York City
Thursday, January 31, 2008

ENDORSEMENT

What We Can Do For Our Country

By: GAY CITY NEWS

In a presidential inaugural address that inspired a teenager from Hope,
Arkansas named Bill Clinton, John F. Kennedy famously urged Americans to focus not on
what the country could do for them, but on what contributions they could make
to the nation.

Mind you, we in the LGBT community are not yet nearly at the point where this
nation has made good on the contributions it owes to our lives, our families,
our well-being, even our equal citizenship.

Faced with the choice of two progressive Democrats who have spoken at length
and with conviction about the challenges facing our lives, we still don't have
the luxury of picking a candidate who will advocate for our right to marry. We
must yet take it on faith that the next president will have the fortitude to
insist that Congress - including too many stragglers within the Democratic Party -
open up the nation's military to out gay and lesbian patriots.

It is far from certain that the next time the Democratic Congress takes up an
employment nondiscrimination measure it will include transgendered Americans as
well as gay men and lesbians among those protected.

But after seven years of George W. Bush, and compared against the prospect of
either John McCain or Mitt Romney, Hillary Rodham Clinton and Barack Obama truly
offer hope to LGBT Americans that help is on the way.

Given that the two Democratic contenders share a similar, generally friendly
and supportive posture toward LGBT Americans, we ought to think about the message
our choice sends about a fundamental question - what our politics should be
all about. We are finding our place here and there at the table, but we have also
spent much of our life on the outside. The nation needs to hear our views on
how American politics can accommodate new voices in the mix.

Judged by that measure and taking full stock of how the Democratic nomination
contest has unfolded, we believe the choice is clear.

Gay City New endorses Barack Obama.

The Illinois senator has spoken of a politics of hope and change, not
surprisingly given a life that has included a father from Kenya and a mother from
Kansas, a term as president of the Harvard Law Review and a job as a community
organizer on the streets of Chicago.

Obama is a relative newcomer to the national scene, and it is not unfair to ask
that he explain as clearly as possible how his skills, experience, and vision
qualify him for the toughest job on earth. He deserves kudos for his courage in
standing up against the rush to war in Iraq at a time when conventional
political wisdom counseled a would-be national figure to do otherwise. He will serve
the nation well if he can articulate a comprehensive approach not only toward
the mess in Iraq but also the broader and more explosive question of America's
standing in the entire Islamic world.

In his recent comments about what Ronald Reagan offered to Americans hungry for
optimism and new ideas, Obama ought to have made more clear his understanding
that at critical moments the hope for unity cannot substitute for hard choices.
This newspaper was probably tougher on Obama than anyone else was for his
ill-considered decision to call on Donnie McClurkin - a so-called "ex-gay" gospel
singer vitriolic in his attacks on the LGBT community - to reach out to
churchgoing African-American communities in South Carolina. We are counting on him to
make wiser choices in future efforts to "build bridges" - and on that score
applaud the loving words about his "gay brothers and sisters" Obama enunciated from
Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.'s Atlanta pulpit last week.

The McClurkin episode, unfortunate as it was, pales in comparison to the
divisiveness that Senator Clinton has allowed her campaign to devolve into. Her
comparison between the roles played by Dr. King and President Lyndon Johnson in
advancing civil rights can be chalked up to inartfulness. The comments coming from
her surrogates are far more disturbing, forming a pattern that sadly can no
longer be ignored.

Three Clintonites - the husband of former New Hampshire Governor Jeanne
Shaheen, Black Entertainment Television founder Robert Johnson, and, most damningly,
key strategist Mark Penn - all injected Obama's acknowledged youthful cocaine
use into the debate. New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo inexplicably used the
phrase "shuck and jive" in describing what a presidential candidate might try
to pull with the media, and then had his operatives bombard the press with
official umbrage that his words might be construed as targeting the
African-American senator.

Nobody, however, has been more egregious than Bill Clinton. In his ardent
championing of his wife, the former president has dissed Obama as "a kid" and this
past Saturday was quick to mention Jesse Jackson's 1984 and 1988 South Carolina
primary wins to contextualize Obama's commanding victory.

Notwithstanding the role of BET's Johnson and the ardent support for the New
York senator from towering African-American members of Congress such as Charlie
Rangel and Maxine Waters, the Clinton campaign's intent is clear - Barack Obama,
after his strong showing with white voters in Iowa and New Hampshire, must be
marginalized as the "black candidate," or Hillary runs the risk of losing.

That is unacceptable, and the LGBT community should lend its voice to a growing
progressive chorus in turning its back on this kind of politics. For us,
winning in the ghetto is no longer good enough - not for blacks, not for gays, not
for anyone.

There is a great deal we admire about Hillary Clinton, and our conclusion about
the direction of her campaign is arrived at with a heavy heart. Should she
prevail in the nomination fight, we have hope that the better angels of her nature
will come to the fore in the fall campaign.

But at this moment we put our faith in the hope that remains undimmed. We urge
a vote for Barack Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Yurovsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 09:44 AM
Response to Original message
1. January 31st???
Edited on Mon Apr-07-08 09:45 AM by Yurovsky
You must be on the slowest dial-up connection on the planet. Make sure to come back and tell us how Super Tuesday played out ....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NorthCarolina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. So, you were already aware of this endorsement?
Oh, and Hillary tanked on Super Tuesday...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yurovsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. Just busting your chops ...
and no, I wasn't aware of the endorsement.

Thanks for the heads up (seriously!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 09:45 AM
Response to Original message
2. he must have mailed Gay City news their separate set of basic rights. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snooper2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 10:00 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. Or, most of the gay community supports Obama...
and you are out of the loop :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. hardly -- but you can think whatever you want. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 09:47 AM
Response to Original message
3. Thanks. I was looking for this yesterday n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
5. thank you
And welcome to DU. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 10:06 AM
Response to Original message
8. The most notable thing about this endorsement was it had nothing to do with GLBT issues.
But Obama followers keep playing it as though it was some kind of 'lookit! the gays like us after all!' endorsement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. that will go unnoticed --
but that's not surprising at DU when it comes to those of us with strong objections the O's approach to lgbtiq folk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mckeown1128 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #8
12.  How insulting can you be...
The GBLT community is not filled with one issue zombies... they aren't idiots as Clinton supporters (like yourself) would have us believe. Most gay folks I know don't give a shit about McClurkin.. they look at policies and ability to get things done. That is why they haven't "chosen" Hillary as you rabid supporters would have us believe. Besides Obama has a better track record than the Clinton's do with GBLT issues. So spare the BS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ampad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. Exactly well said (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kdpeters Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
9. That was a really good article
the Clinton campaign's intent is clear - Barack Obama,
after his strong showing with white voters in Iowa and New Hampshire, must be
marginalized as the "black candidate," or Hillary runs the risk of losing.

That is unacceptable, and the LGBT community should lend its voice to a growing
progressive chorus in turning its back on this kind of politics.
For us,
winning in the ghetto is no longer good enough - not for blacks, not for gays, not
for anyone.


Very well said. I agree whole heart.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 05:25 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC