|
Edited on Mon Mar-24-08 06:34 AM by Perky
First of all I want to say that I am both Pro-Obama and anti-Clinton. I wish she had given Obama a clear path weeks ago. Yet having said that Having said that, I believe that based on both her popular vote totals, her general competitiveness and her amassed delegates that she has every right to continue the fight. Having said my love for the Democratic Party and my fear of the GOP trumps everything else.
Given that Florida and Michigan will not re-vote and will likely be penalized by the halving of their delegates;
Given that the PV in those states are somewhat suspect,improperly voted and not recognized by the DNC the PVs should not be counted toward a global PV winner. That means that Obama is virtually assured of a PV victory; and given there is currently a near certainty that the pledged delegate winner will not flip:
There is going to come a point (Maybe with Pennsylvania, but more likely with North Carolina) where Obama locks down victories in Popular votes, Pledged Delegates and States won.
I understand the argument that Hillary won the Big states, but that is a misnomer on three important levels. First there is no indication, that Obama would not win New York, California, NJ or Massachusetts in the Fall and Current Polling in MI, PA, OH and FL suggest that while the constituencies are differ nt, either candidate is going to have to work those battlegrounds hard. Secondly, Obama won big states as well and won with substantial margins. Virginia. Maryland, Wisconsin, Georgia, Colorado and Washington. Third. The Big State argument is only an argument of last resort and is only useful in convincing Super delegates.
But here is the thing, Obama having won the most states, votes and pledged delegates and having done so by energizing the base and bringing new voters to the polls is by any definition of the result of the voting more entitled to be the nominee. And while clearly he has has more work to do and certainly could stumble badly in the final contests, his path to the nomination is far easier.
To deny Obama and his supporter the nomination by masterful working of the super delegates while wholly within the rules of the party, would be devastating to those young voters and core democratic constituencies who voted for him in droves.
Such a victory would certainly be very close and and would be viewed as overturning the popular will . Key Democratic constituencies would be very angry. I think there would be protests. I think there is a chance that there would be riots in some Urban areas. I think that would in turn dissolution both new voters and push swing voters into McCain's arms.
I am not saying Hillary should step aside now.
In that scenario for Clinton to then ask Obama to be on the ticket would largely be viewed as tokenism at its worst and I am sure Clinton would be virtually required to ask and that Obama would be loathe to accept. At the end of the day, a D"ream ticket" would probably still lose in the Fall and it would hurt the party on the down ballot across the country. There is certainly no time to heal the rift in the party if Obama is not the nominee and is not asked to be the VP should Hillary win. ANd should Hillary win The Bush coalition would rally strongly to defeat the woman who's ugly path to the nomination, validates EVERYTHING they feel about her.
But after PA, NC and Indiana. if Obama has locked Pledged delegates. Popular vote and states won. Hillary needs to step aside. The price of clawing to a victory from that point forward will be losing in Novembers. and fracturing the party in ways that it may never recover.
We will be hurt in every race on election day; we will not have the mandate to bring the troops home; we risk an even more conservative SCOTUS.
If you care about the party, if you care about control of the levers of power in this country. If Obama is at all tolerable to you. If after North Carolina, Obama has locked down national victories in Delegates, Popular votes and States won, you must insist that Hillary concede the race.
|