Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Has Nader gotten enough signatures to be on the ballot in any state

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
MoonRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-04 12:56 PM
Original message
Has Nader gotten enough signatures to be on the ballot in any state
requiring this? Aside from Gallup's rigged results, I haven't heard much about what's going with his campaign lately.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
WVhill Donating Member (245 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-04 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. The Mountain Party which was the only independent
party to automatically get a listing on the WV ballot turned Nader down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoPasaran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-04 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
2. For what it's worth
Here's what the Texas Democratic Party says:

Keep Ralph Nader off the Texas Ballot
Ralph Nader’s chances of getting on the ballot in Texas do not look good- he needs at least 65,000 signatures by Monday and news reports say that many people, weary of George W. Bush and wary of throwing the election to the GOP by voting for Nader, are refusing to sign ballot access petitions. Remember, if you have voted in the Democratic primary you cannot sign Nader’s petitions (or those for any other third-party or independent candidates) and that a vote for Nader is a vote for Bush. We are here to elect Democrats because their vision is the right one for our country. Ralph Nader makes a point of attacking and trying to defeat Democrats. We need to make sure he is nowhere near a ballot in Texas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-04 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. YAY!! Hooray for Texas!!
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ricdude Donating Member (218 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-04 02:56 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. What a crappy ballot access policy.
Is Texas really within the Nader margin of electing Kerry?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoPasaran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-04 08:03 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. Probably not
I would hate to see Busholini carry Travis County like he did in 2000. That was shameful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pezcore64 Donating Member (498 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-04 08:04 AM
Response to Reply #3
10. oh yeah
yay to our party for squishing democracy. which is exaclty what they are doing saying 'a vote for nader is a vote for bush'. surely you guys dont believe that? that was just democratic propaganda to get independents on board. statements like that will only DRIVE them away. last time i checked, we wanted them on board.

i wish our party WOULD GROW THE FREAK UP!

the supreme court STOLE the election, not naders 3%.
and dont you forget it!

So much hatred for Nader when his idealogy is closest to alot of our own.

tis a shame.

i really dont think people need to attack nader, he simply just isnt a threat. I doubt he'll get even close to what he got last time. Unless repubs start voting for him. Which i think happened a lil in 2000 so everyone could blame him while they threw away votes and used the judicial branch to declare them victors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fujiyama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-04 07:04 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. Too bad
it really doesn't matter in TX anyways. Kerry is very unlikely to win that state.

I'm more worried about WI, OR, MN, FL, NH, IA, OH, MI, and all the other swing states.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenInNC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-04 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
4. none so far
He is not on the ballot in any state so far but there are several states that require less than a 1000 sigs or just a filling fee to be put on the ballot.

Just as an aside, I am a Green who does not support him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-04 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Do you know which states require less than 1000 and which a filing fee?
Edited on Sun May-09-04 01:40 PM by saywhat
I'd like to know because I believe the polling results putting Nader at 6 and 7 points are bogus.

I'm delighted to hear you're not voting for him! :bounce: I wrote in Nader in 1996, but never again. My goal is to get a majority of progressive Dems in the House and Senate, then amend the Constitution to abolish the electoral college, and permit third parties an equal footing in General Elections. I know, dream on.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenInNC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-04 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. I will ask
my buddy who is a ballot access guru and get back to you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-04 08:34 AM
Response to Reply #6
11. Thanks!
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gothmog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-04 09:29 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. Even with Nader, Gore carried Harris County
Even with Nader, Gore carried Harris County in 2000. Nader will not make a difference once way or another in Texas. I am glad that he is not going to be on the Texas ballot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-04 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
13. I don't think Nader will be on ballot in many states
he probably should have sought the Green party nomination because it may be getting too late for him to get on many states.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-04 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. I believe the Green Party rejected him?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-04 09:52 AM
Response to Original message
14. Today is the deadline for Texas
Not that his presence on will have an effect on the outcome in Texas. But it would be symbolic, and if he fails to get on the ballot in a lot of states it may affect how much coverage the media gives him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 12:05 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC