Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Gallup Daily: Clinton Now at 47%, Obama at 45%

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
BooScout Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 01:09 PM
Original message
Gallup Daily: Clinton Now at 47%, Obama at 45%
http://www.gallup.com/poll/105040/Gallup-Daily-Clinton-Now-47-Obama-45.aspx

PRINCETON, NJ -- Gallup Poll Daily election tracking from March 14-16 finds Hillary Clinton's bid for the 2008 Democratic nomination supported by 47% of national Democratic voters, and Barack Obama's candidacy favored by 45%.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
slinkerwink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
1. Margin of error 3%
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merwin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Funny how margin of error becomes important when your candidate is behind.
Just for reference, I would be happy with either candidate... which leaves me sadly shaking my head at all of this infighting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #4
29. If the margin of error is 3%, then they're statistically tied.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BooScout Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Obama is down 5 % in 4 days.....
The shift is considered significant.........unless of course you are using Obama Math.:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nickn777 Donating Member (249 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. Of course it's not significant...
Obama led by 8 points nationally not too long ago....thats only a 10 point swing, well within the polls margin of error.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeaLyons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #5
24. ...
5% in 4 days, 10% in 8, 15% in 12 and so it will go.....

:thumbsup:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #5
27. yes it is
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
totodeinhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 06:39 PM
Response to Reply #27
68. No it is not. The lead in the poll has been seesawing for some time.
Clinton has been up more than three points several times, and then Obama always comes back. Look for the lead in this poll to alternate several more times.

And in spite of all of the negative coverage that Obama has got over Wright, it's really something that he is till statistically tied. You would think that after all of this crap he would be down by 15 or 20 points.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BigDDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 05:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
53. Think it's really 50% to 45%?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
2. good deal
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Teaser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
3. yeah, it'll bounce around like this
Really, I don't know why both sides keep trumpeting their polls. It's all noise right now.

There will be no "collapse" by either candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anamandujano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. It'll be bouncing downward for Bama.
Anything else will be shocking, even to his supporters, who are presently feverish over the Wright situation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moobu2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. Yeah it’ll bounce around until he lands at around 28-30%
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Teaser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #9
19. Let's make a bet. $100.00 that he's up again in 2 weeks.
Edited on Mon Mar-17-08 01:28 PM by Teaser
It only has to be a day. but I'm willing to bet you 100 bucks it's the case.

Care to take it?

will you put your money where your mouth is?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moobu2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #19
25. To be honest, I thought about taking you up on it
but I cant take your money like that. Keep it you'll need it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Teaser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #25
30. "My hands are lethal weapons, man, I wouldn't want to hurt you"
heard that one before too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RunningFromCongress Donating Member (519 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #25
49. I don't need it, so you can make the bet w/ me $500
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goldcanyonaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
6. OUTLIER!
I call foul.

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
8. WHOOPIE!
Day upon day of the MSM trying to make Obama's church into a damaging issue and its only good for a 2% drop?

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
11. Wow. Based On The Historical Numbers, That's A REALLY Bad Sign For Him. He's Toast I Think.
Hehehe just kidding just kidding. Get your hands off the reply button.

:hide:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slinkerwink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. did you hear he's giving a major speech on race
tomorrow?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BooScout Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. of course he is.....
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anamandujano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. Will he have that "Faith, Guidance for Voters" sign behind him?
We don't have minds; we need guidance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. What's Your Point?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Teaser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #12
21. OMC was joking
Everybody needs to stop being trigger happy. I'm including myself in that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CakeGrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #12
23. How dare he respond to the slime tactics?
Who does he think he is trying to attack poor poor Hillary like that? Between this and asking her to stop hiding her financial information, he's just gone too far. :sarcasm:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #23
65. self delete
Edited on Mon Mar-17-08 06:27 PM by OPERATIONMINDCRIME
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 06:16 PM
Response to Reply #11
64. No, no. It's when he's AHEAD that his campaign is about to collapse!
A tie is good news--the haters don't know which way to break.

:D :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fjc Donating Member (700 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
13. Even if true, which I doubt
it's too late anyway. That Obama math is correct in one way. He's got more delegates. I can't see how Hillary is gonna overcome that without trashing the will of the voters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
15. That unpossible!
I read that everybody hates her!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #15
47. You must be reading DU--esp. gd-p.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goldcanyonaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 01:27 PM
Response to Original message
18. USA TODAY/Gallup Poll: Clinton up 5 points on McCain; Obama up 2
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #18
38. bullshit. That isn't reality. You haven't even seen the Clinton haters come out yet
and if she gets the nomination, when they do come out, with ads everyday bringing up the Clinton scandals of the ninties, via the MSM, it will make Kerry's swift boating look like childs play

enjoy the illusion while you can.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #38
56. Playing the Rovian FEAR CARD IS so unbecoming. tsk tsk
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Texas Hill Country Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
20. yeah, nice double standards in here from the obama supporters...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Teaser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. Which Obama supporters?
Which ones are demonstrating this double standard?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoadRage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
26. You act like this is a good thing?
Mathmatically, Obama is going to win the Democratic Nominee.. so taking happiness from these downward spiral polls while your candidate continues to pointlessly beat up on Obama seems to make little sense. Unless you're a closet McCain supporter, and are really hoping he wins the general election. In that case, it would make sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. ah --you can foresee the future. Which crystal ball you using?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoadRage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #28
43. The one with a calculator in it. NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #43
44. its energy source is dead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
31. Obama viewed favorably today by just 47%, down 5 since last Thursday.*****


Obama viewed favorably today by just 47%, down 5 since last Thursday.
Mon Mar-17-08 10:20 AM

The dialogue about Wright’s controversial comments appears to have had at least a short-term impact on public perceptions of Barack Obama. The Illinois Senator is viewed favorably today by just 47% of voters nationwide. That’s down five points since last Thursday (see recent daily results). The number with an unfavorable view of Obama has risen from 44% on Thursday to 50% today. Among White voters, Obama is now viewed favorably by 43% and unfavorably by 54%.

Looked at from a slightly longer perspective, Obama’s overall favorable ratings peaked at 56% on February 21, shortly after he won the Wisconsin Primary. At that point, Clinton began raising questions about Obama as part of the campaign that ultimately enabled her to win the Texas and Ohio Primaries. Since then, Obama’s net favorability ratings have fallen seventeen points (from plus 14 points on February 21 to minus 3 points today).

http://rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/election_20082/2008_presidential_election/daily_presidential_tracking_poll
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
32. "Obama’s net favorability ratings have fallen seventeen points" -since WI
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nickn777 Donating Member (249 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #32
35. The whole argument about electability has....
completely vanished. There is absolutely no recent data, especially after Pastorgate, that suggests Obama is more electable than Clinton. In fact, I believe todays USA Today poll shows Clinton doing better against McCain.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #35
39. I agree. --
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
33. and off to the GREATEST
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shawmut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
34. k&r
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
36. if she gets the nomination, you will see the rehash of Bill Clinton's affairs.
and watch us lose because of that bagage in a major way in November

It is very hard for me to believe with all the baggage that the Clinton's have that she even ran for President





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #36
46. the news is ready to move on. they are no longer obsessed with Bills penis
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #36
48. People don't care
they barely cared in the '90s.

It seems Obama supporters here are more obsessed with the topic than anyone else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #48
59. so many are obsessed with Bill's penis. Sick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wiggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
37. Not relevant until the dust settles and a truer picture of Obama and his
church emerge. The rebuttal hasn't even happened yet. Once Wright fever is over and Wright isn't on TV 24 hours a day, those images will be replaced by ones that more effectively convey what Obama and his church are really like.

These poll trends will reverse, given time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #37
40. yeah yeah..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tandem5 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
41. At a national level they're tied - they've been tied for a month or so
its nothing more than noise that's causing them to trade the lead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MindMatter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 02:49 PM
Response to Original message
42. The problem is, Clinton cannot get over 47% and you need 51%
plus a Diebold factor. There is absolutely no scenario where Hillary can get over 50%. Her neagatives have been in the high 40s for 15 years and are not going to get any better.

The only people who have ruled out voting for Obama are about 10% of the country that are racist enough to make the KKK proud and a few arch conservative, but even some of them would vote for Obama because they have such contempt for McCain.

In other words, Obama has a potential pool of about 70% of the electorate, 30% of which is soft for him now. He has to win over 12% of that 30%.

Clinton has a potential pool of about 50% on a good day, and about 15% of that is soft. She has to shore up every bit of her soft support and then somehow get accepted by a set of voters who is dead set against her.

It will not work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LuvMyPorsche Donating Member (121 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
45. don't
count a Clinton out!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
50. Great news, thanks!!! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avrdream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
51. Way cool.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 05:01 PM
Response to Original message
52. k
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 05:29 PM
Response to Original message
54. REC and K for the gal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 05:29 PM
Response to Reply #54
55. k
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
57. oh well when we see Hillary's tax records her poll will drop like a stone?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 05:40 PM
Response to Reply #57
58. HA --that is boring
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DerekJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 05:46 PM
Response to Original message
60. is that it?
Is that all this weeklong swiftboating can do? drop him back to where he was a week ago?

Pfffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffft

swiftboating attempt : FAILED

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johnny__Motown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 05:47 PM
Response to Original message
61. Blip
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AJH032 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
62. national polls do not matter
only the handful of states left do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
against all enemies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 05:59 PM
Response to Original message
63. CNN poll has Obama up
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Megahurtz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #63
67. Woo Hoo!
:bounce:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kahuna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 06:39 PM
Response to Reply #63
69. Yep. 52% Obama, 45% Clinton. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
finalnews Donating Member (13 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
66. What's the use of polling the whole country?
I don't get it. Most of the states voted already, yet Gallup and others keep conducting "national" polls. How about polling remaining states individually? It's more useful, and...is it that hard to do?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rcsl1998 Donating Member (501 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
70. .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rcsl1998 Donating Member (501 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 06:48 PM
Response to Original message
71. .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 01:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC