Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Democrats risk losing a generation

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
bunnies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 03:38 PM
Original message
Democrats risk losing a generation


Democrats risk losing a generation

BY RON DZWONKOWSKI • FREE PRESS COLUMNIST • March 16, 2008

If -- and it's still an if -- the numbers just don't add up for U.S. Sen. Hillary Clinton to be the Democratic presidential nominee, but the party, through its arcane rules and superdelegates process, gives it to her anyway, Democrats will pay dearly, for a generation or more.
Advertisement

Instead of re-establishing themselves as the party in power for perhaps the next 20 years, Democrats could be effectively handing the White House to Republican John McCain and alienating up to 30 million young voters who have gotten engaged in politics this year for the first time because of Barack Obama. If these voters feel that Obama has been cheated out of a chance to run for president, they and the hordes more of them becoming eligible to vote in the years ahead, will not easily return to the Democratic fold. Even if they like the party's principles, they will distrust its processes.

In this scenario, Clinton mitigates the damage only somewhat by choosing Obama as her vice presidential candidate -- a role he has said he doesn't want anyway.

More likely, young voters sit out the election (as they have in the past) and McCain wins and Democrats dissolve again into their bickering, finger-pointing ways while an emerging generation that desperately wants to see a stronger, safer and better America backs out of the political system.


much more at link: http://www.freep.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080316/COL32/803160501/1081
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 03:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. That is the correct reading......
and there is more than this fall out to come.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
splat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
2. Americans of all ages want the GOP out; young voters aren't more essential than any others
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Wrong call......
but I am not surprised at the lack of insight displayed by your cavaliere remarks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Whoa, you are way out of touch.
Obama will bring 5-10 million young people to the polls to VOTE DEMOCRATIC. And when the country turns around, they will feel like they had a significant hand in the recovery. Nominating Hillary negate that possibility.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
splat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. The echo chamber is isolating, guys; reinforcing each other does not make it true
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drachasor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #10
17. Exit polls and survey show record numbers of young people voting for Obama
How do you dismiss that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
splat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #17
23. It just may not matter when GOP is reviled, and McCain (no economist) can't feed country
Edited on Sun Mar-16-08 04:01 PM by splat
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drachasor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 04:05 PM
Response to Reply #23
33. Young people matter for the future of the party and the country
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #23
36. These young people have been voting for change.....
and especially not for Bush/Clinton/Bush/Clinton.

The fact that you don't get this is one of the reason that we are where we are today; regressing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Why Syzygy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #10
50. This is just common sense and average observational skills.
Any thinking person can figure this one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greyghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #10
58. Damn straight. They've been told that repeatedly, but they are
Edited on Sun Mar-16-08 05:05 PM by greyghost
VERY SLOW on the uptake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
populistdriven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #10
63. And Hillary is spending all her money to get McCain elected - she endorsed him afterall
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 04:03 PM
Original message
Obama still seems like "the best of two choices" to me and not so much a movement builder
Long before Obama had name recognition, political involvement was up HUGELY. The turnout in the November 2006 election was quite high, for one... :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #7
34. The largest voting bock in the country is women over 40
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kittycat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #34
38. And I'm sure they're going to want those new voters upholding their rights
down the road.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
splat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #38
46. No, they want the first woman president upholding their rights; is this a blindspot for you?
Edited on Sun Mar-16-08 04:33 PM by splat
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kittycat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #46
78. Why do you insult me? I AM a woman.
:eyes:

I have nothing wrong with the right woman being elected president. But HRC is NOT the right woman, IMO. I'd rather a leader than a victim that offers us no transparency.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #46
87. I'm a woman and I want my children included in the process.
I'm also an old lady and I know I won't live forever. I want to that they have a good start in their adult lives before I die. I'd vote for Hillary if I thought she'd really include more than the cronies and hangers on she and Bill have dragged around with them for the past 30 years. I think that she (and Bill because they are a set) will take care of themselves first and will cover for the Bushes. I don't trust her, or him. They are corrupt. I think Obama address the right kind of change and will protect everyone's rights, including and most importantly, restoring habeus corpus.

I want the right person, and sometimes the right person isn't a woman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #46
108. we are women and we don't want her. How big a blindspot is that
for you? You do not speak for us. We speak for ourselves, unless you find it difficult with the concept that women can do that nowadays.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunnies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #34
52. and yet
"... Millennial Generation, born from 1983-2003, and at 80 million strong, the largest generation in American history."

So who is more important to the future of the party?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #52
133. That's funny ... I was born in 1955 and I plan to vote for another 30 years.
Of course, I guess us boomers should just get the fuck over it, huh. Oh, and PAY FOR EVERYTHING on our way out.

Who is making the house payments, the car payments, holding down the career jobs, paying off their kids' college loans? Is it the 20 somethings? No, I think it's us boomers. And we do still vote, by the way.

Bake
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 07:44 PM
Response to Reply #34
106. That is part of the problem.
If Obama can get another 10 million young people to the polls, we can make sure they stay involved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 07:45 PM
Response to Reply #34
107. I belong to that block and I am voting for change, not the same old,
same old in a dress
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #7
105. people voting young tend to stay their lifetimes with that party. we
will pay through the butt if this elitist bullshit plays out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunnies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 04:28 PM
Response to Reply #2
39. Young voters are Democrats of the future.
Long term Dem rule would be nice. Dont you think?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
splat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #39
44. We're the Dems of the present, and we actually vote
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunnies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #44
55. And so are they.
They're voting for Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #44
84. Dinosaurs thought that way, and you know what happened to them.
Stay away from tar pits and bogs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
okasha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 08:01 PM
Response to Reply #84
118. Yep.
The smart, fast little buggers grew feathers and became birds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Exilednight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #2
75. Americans of all ages may want the GOP out, but that doesn't mean they want Hillary in. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Harry Monroe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #2
89. Whoa, have you been looking around lately??
I live in Starkville Mississippi, a pretty conservative college town. Here at Mississippi State, I see HUGE support from the students for Obama. This in a blood red state. If Hillary gets the nomination by hook or crook I'm sure these normally apathetic Republican voters will become disillusioned and rightfully so. They will probably become disgusted and once again become apathetic, believing that it is politics as usual and refuse to come out to vote or will go with McCain. I believe this is indicative of college students nationwide.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 07:53 PM
Response to Reply #89
112. The Hilbots don't seem to get that
Edited on Sun Mar-16-08 08:10 PM by TOJ
The 18-25 crowd is not excited about the party per se. They would like an anti-Bush as president, but not because of party afiliation, They want someone who is young, energetic, positive, enthusiastic, forward-looking, engaged, and engaging, instead of the stupid, lazy, mean, lying old drunk we have now. I don't think they will flock to McCain, but they will definitely stay home on election day, and that will be enough to cost us the White House and probably 20-odd seats in the House and 3-4 in the Senate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
3. Hell, I've been a Democrat for decades and if they pull that crap
I'm outta here too!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Right There With Ya Tabasco !!!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
searchingforlight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
5. You have a good point.
The young voter turnout this year has been the big story, bigger than the fact that we have a chance to make history with either of our candidates.

The majority of democrats will vote for the ticket no matter what but younger voters might well be so disillusioned that they stay home. The passion is for the man. It is in him that they see themselves represented.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
splat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #5
15. If the passion is for the man, join a fan club; the parties represent different Americas
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
searchingforlight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #15
24. You assume I am making a sexual reference?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
splat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. Of course not; it's not about the man, it's about corporate party vs. people's party
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GarbagemanLB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #25
31. And Hillary is the corporate candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
splat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #31
40. No: GOP is the corporate party; Nader split us before with 'there's no difference'
There is a huge difference between the parties; the differences between Hillary and Obama are trifling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GarbagemanLB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
8. Agreed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texas_indy Donating Member (432 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
9. I've voted democratic president al candidate since '92. If Obama has the nomination stolen from
him by a DNC "coup d’état" then the democratic party can kiss off a lot of people for any support this fall.

If the democratic party supports a DNC "coup d’état", then why even pretend that the "will of the people" matters.
They should just instead be honest about it and have ONLY the party elite select the nominee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
splat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Obama hasn't won the nomination; that only happens at the convention
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texas_indy Donating Member (432 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #12
35. If Obama has the majority of popular votes and delegates when he arrives at the
convention and the "super" delegates steal the nomination from him, then they will have committed a "coup d’état" against the will of the people.

They will have proved before the entire world that the elite can steal an election from the common people in broad daylight and call it just, even in the USA.

And this would be done by the so called "party of the people".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
splat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #35
49. The superdelegates' role is to keep the party on course, however they interpret that
It is not to ratify the plunge off a cliff by an angry mob, for example.

If you think this is "stealing," you don't understand the checks and balances built into our system of govt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texas_indy Donating Member (432 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #49
54. " checks and balances built into our system of govt."?????
Edited on Sun Mar-16-08 04:50 PM by texas_indy
This is a "political party" and NOT our govt!

And what example can you gives us where the party choice elite has overturned the choice of the majority of the people in that party in the US?

Even the repukes don't use this crap of super delegates who can overturn the choice of the party people.

If you think this isn't stealing, then you should have no issue at all with dictatorships anywhere in the world.

After all, "they" did the same thing to "not to ratify the plunge off a cliff by an angry mob". Viva la Revolucion!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
splat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #54
67. Think about it in the context of history of both parties
Internet rules don't apply.

("Up the Revolution" was the American version, National Mobe and all that.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texas_indy Donating Member (432 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #67
95. What you are trying to say ??
"Think about it in the context of history of both parties"
- what does this have to do with theft by the party elite? I only see one party having the super delegates.
- Are you saying that if something that is wrong has been done before, then it is alright to do it again?


"Internet rules don't apply." - what on Earth does this mean?


"("Up the Revolution" was the American version, National Mob and all that.)"
- So does this mean you support all dictatorships since they use the same excuse for over throwing the "rule of the mob"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 07:52 PM
Response to Reply #95
110. don't bother, texas. its as incoherent as it sounds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 07:50 PM
Response to Reply #49
109. hey splat. the majority choosing obama is not a plunge off a cliff
we are the 'demo-cra-tic' party. we get to have our say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunnies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #9
56. Since '92? Me too!
:toast: I proudly voted for Bill Clinton for the first 5 years of my voting life.

But if my party wants to tell me that my vote doesnt count, then it doesnt get to count on my vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Why Syzygy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #9
96. It won't be the DNC. Look out for the DLC, the Clinton's gang. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzybeans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
11. It will prove their suspicions of Clinton being just another member of the power elite
and they don't have the blind loyalty to the brand name Clinton. It is meaningless to them. So you can't just say something and have them wish it was true. They won't defend her blindly in the GE like her older supporters are doing now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lapfog_1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
13. Given that Hillary is no longer a Democrat...
if the Democratic party, to which I have supported and donated to for 7 years now, and voted for since I have been able to vote, gives the nomination to Hillary, I will leave the party.

If it was any other Democrat still in against Obama, this would likely not be the case... if it had been Obama and Edwards here at the end, I probably wouldn't care which one was nominated. But Hillary's betrayal of the Party with the endorsement of McCain over Obama is the straw that broke this camel's back. I will never forget that nor will I forgive it. Not much is made of that outrage now, what with Ferraro's racist remarks and the dust up over Rev. Wright, but for me, this video says it all.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ou4JnWQsxKw

and it's the same thing that Joe Lieberman did and the same that Zell Miller did.

And I still won't be surprised to find Hillary as the VP nominee on McCain's ticket (with a promise that she can run for President at the end of his term).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
splat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. Hillary's a Democrat, you're an Obamacrat
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nostradammit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 03:59 PM
Original message
And you are aptly named
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drachasor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. Don't be a lamer
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 07:53 PM
Response to Reply #16
111. hey splat, explain post 67 before you call people names.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nia Zuri Donating Member (576 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
14. I've voted since '78 and I would be out too. The alternative would be to form a third party...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boston bean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
18. you don't think O might have turned them off already. All that unity he talks about
and he attends a divisive church for twenty years.

Talk about being let down and turned off to a political process.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drachasor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. How is the church he attends divisive?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #20
26. HRC supporters blindly accept the spin, or perpetuate it themselves.
Go here and look at this so called "hate church":
http://www.tucc.org/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drachasor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #26
32. I ask him so that he can make clear that his claim lacks substance
That's the way I roll.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #20
42. too much gyrating
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sunnystarr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #18
28. It's not a divisive church
why don't you take the time to research it before you make statements.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunnies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #18
45. No. I dont think young people really give a crap about this church thing.
Ive not encountered a single Obama supporter who's mind has been changed by it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drachasor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #45
80. My 89 year-old grandmother doesn't give a crap about it either
Nor does my mother.

Guess who they're voting for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ananda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 04:00 PM
Response to Original message
21. What we have really lost from Dems and all politicos.
The great loss is the ability of the American
people to influence public policy and the
dissemination of information in a fair and
truthful manner.. resulting in the loss of
our constitutional protections and the rule of
law.

Neither party actually deserves any support
whatsoever.. but the system is manipulated to
keep both parties afloat as the two wings of
the rightwing business party.

Sue
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
apocalypsehow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
22. Ah, but you don't get it! The coronation is more important than the Democratic Party or the country!
Get with the program!

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
splat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #22
29. The coronation of Obama seems the goal here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wileedog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #29
37. That pesky winning the election thing
tends to lead to that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #22
30. Ready On Day One !!!


:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tarheel_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #30
43. omg WillyT...you shoulda warned me
:spray: Now you owe me a keyboard :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bilgewaterbill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #30
48. That's the funniest damn thing I've seen all weekend!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunnies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #22
41. How silly of me! lol.
Whats good for the Clintons is good for the world! :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 07:55 PM
Response to Reply #22
113. what the fuck don't people understand that if he wins the most votes
he's the winner?! And it looks like that's going to happen. if the sd have a brain, they will support their states and districts. He wins. Legally. Get over it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Window Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 04:03 PM
Response to Original message
27. K/R.
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
47. Well Maybe The Young Voters Need A Good Breaking In On The World Of Politics.
If they think it's all bubblegum and lollipops, well then they probably ain't ready to enter the arena anyway. If they're interested in politics, then they're gonna have to get a thick skin like the rest of us and learn how to fuckin suck it up. Politics ain't for the weak.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
splat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #47
51. Tough love, old timer; politics will always break your heart eventually
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #51
53. They Need To Start Learning That Soon.
Way I see it, I'm proud of them for finally getting involved, but based on some of the tantrums I've seen and some of the comments from them, many of them don't even truly understand politics and instead are energized because of this perception that Obama is some gift from god and that the landscape of politics can be forever altered by a click of their heels and wave of their wand. Bubblegum and lollipops. Thing is, Obama's good, but he ain't that good. At the end of the day he's far more like Hillary than they'd ever be able to admit, and he's not anywhere near being this political messiah they've propped him up as being. That doesn't mean Obama doesn't deserve their support, since he does. What it means, is that based on their fragile political mindset and almost naively politically idealistic point of view, that there's a huge risk that come 2012, when they realize that he didn't turn out to be the forever changing the world and way politics works type leader they thought he was, that they're just gonna take their ball and go home anyway.

I'm proud of them for getting involved and we need them to be the next generation of Democrats that help us keep momentum in our favor for quite some time. But to do that affectively, they need to understand far better what politics is and that it isn't this idealistic bubble gum and lollipops arena that they're hoping it's going to be. Once they get the proper perspective and once they can see that even Hillary is far better for us than McCain, then they can truly ultimately help us change the landscape of politics for the better; but over time, not with a click of their heels.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greyghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #53
60. You should use this as an OP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
populistdriven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #53
66. Hillary is worse than McCain and will lose both houses of Congress for us again
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #66
70. Wow. I'm Impressed. You Spelled 'Lose' Right. Yay For You.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
populistdriven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #70
72. I made no personal insults to you. Yet you insist on insulting me personally. PLONK
Edited on Sun Mar-16-08 05:25 PM by bushmeat
welcome to my ignore list
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #72
74. OMC: The Intellectually Challenged's Worst Nightmare.
Thank you, thank you. Woooohooo!!!!

God I love when the ignoramuses put me on ignore! It just, just, just, I dunno, brings a sparkle to my spirit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 07:58 PM
Response to Reply #74
116. I have read your posts, OMG for a long time. You enjoy making
people feel stupid. I pity that. But then, you know you are making people feel stupid. Yet you do it anyway. Too bad. Go ahead. Slag me too. I don't mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 08:07 PM
Response to Reply #116
120. You Just Go On Defending People Who Declare On DU That John McCain's Better Than Hillary.
I'll just keep on sittin here laughing at your feeling pity for me. :hi:

(oh, and there's no G anywhere in operation mindcrime. Just wanted you to know that)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 08:24 PM
Response to Reply #120
123. no. I don't defend them. And I know you like to mock people because
it makes you feel good. Whatever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 08:48 PM
Response to Reply #123
126. Youuuuuuu Just Go On Defending People Who Come Here And Declare McCain As Better Than Hillary.
You keep on doin that pal ok? Why, it just makes you the most honorable DU'er ever!!!! Yay for you!!! Yay!!!!! DU's hero!!!!

Don't mind me if I just sit back and continue to laugh my ass off, k? :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunnies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #126
132. Wait a second.
Hillary declared that McCain was better than Obama. How soon we forget.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
splat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #53
69. 'Over time' - we had to learn that; now that it's here, they say we're dinos and it's their time!
I also think you should start a new post with this insight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkansas Granny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #53
100. Very well said OMC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mooney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #53
122. Almost everyone who initially gets into politics has some degree of naivete.
It takes many years of voting and, yes, getting your heart broken by politicians and politics before losing that.

I first became eligible to vote in 1987, and Bill Clinton was the first vote I ever cast for someone who actually won. When he did, I thought the country was going to change on some fundamental level as a result, or that his election was reflective of some huge change in the American people. It took some years of taking my lumps before I realized that this wasn't the case at all. But I still had to have those experiences of voting idealistically and voting under the mistaken assumption that I was part of a movement to permanently turn the United States into a liberal utopia.

If young people are voting, it's a good bet that it's for reasons that are not entirely realistic, since they're new to the whole process. But that's how we get clear-eyed voters down the road. So the catch-22 is that if we want the Democratic party to be a majority party we have to do it with an infusion of young voters, all of whom cast their votes for the "wrong" reasons, and who will become disillusioned in 2012, as you said, when they figure out that President Obama was nothing but a mere politician and an agent of compromise.

I was very disappointed in Bill Clinton's presidency, but a lot of that was a result of my own naive bubble getting burst. Still, I didn't stop voting. And I think the majority don't no matter how disappointed they get initially. Hopefully, these kids voting for Obama for all the wrong reasons will stay with the party and stay with the process when the liberal utopia does not come to pass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
racaulk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #53
134. .
:applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
citizen snips Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #47
73. I am a young and I have to agree with that statement.
Edited on Sun Mar-16-08 05:56 PM by MATTMAN
Too many young people are buying into this hope and change theme. If Obama wins the nomination and gets a beating in the debate then reality will set in. If Obama can't deliver on his proposals than young voters will abandon him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Duke Newcombe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #47
79. Yeah...they need to understand...
Edited on Sun Mar-16-08 05:43 PM by Duke Newcombe
...that "the program" = "Whatever the power elite of the party wants". Yeah, how dare they actually, you know, believe that the people actually are allowed to determining crap. Just sit down, send in your donations, vote how we tell you, and shut the fuck up.

I'm glad you're here to set them straight.

Duke
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 05:45 PM
Response to Reply #79
81. Nice To See Points Go Over Your Head So Easily.
Hey, at least they didn't mess up your hair while on their way...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Duke Newcombe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #81
85. Your "point" (as it were) was perfectly "gotten"...
The young whipper-snappers are idealistic and foolish by not accepting your candidate, and should just lower their expectations, and go for the conventional choice. I get it. I just think it's a shitty way to vote, or go as a party. Clear enough?

Queensryche is getting more embarrassed with each post.

Duke
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #85
86. ZZZZOOOOOOOOOMMMMMMMM!!!!!! Watch Your Hair!!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Duke Newcombe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #86
90. I'm unclear...
...as to what allusions to things whizzing over hair does to bolster your tenuous grasp on a point. If you don't believe that people should be free to support the candidate they choose, perhaps the Democratic Party isn't the party for you.

Duke
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #90
91. Unclear Indeed...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Duke Newcombe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #91
93. OMC...why do you hate Democracy?
Duke
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #93
94. Because I'm Hitler. Didn'tcha Know?
Someday, may god grant you the wisdom to actually understand the point.

Until then, peace be with you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Duke Newcombe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #94
97. Then I leave you with this...
Got no love for politicians
Or that crazy scene in D.C.
It's just a power mad town
But the time is ripe for changes
There's a growing feeling
That taking a chance on a new kind of vision is due

Brush up some, and get back to me.

Duke
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 06:39 PM
Response to Reply #97
98. Tell Me,
Edited on Sun Mar-16-08 06:39 PM by OPERATIONMINDCRIME
Can you show me where it says to take your ball, go home, and cry when it all doesn't end up perfect with shining rainbows after the first try?

Thanks. :hi:

(Again... zzzzzzooooooooommmmmm, over your head)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 08:00 PM
Response to Reply #93
117. he likes to do this with people. he enjoys it. don't take the bait.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 08:08 PM
Response to Reply #117
121. Awwwww That's So Cute.
C'mere... Let me rub your head my little pet.

God I love my fan club!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Duke Newcombe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #117
127. Yes, I really do like to...
...get straight answers from people instead of posturing. I do in fact enjoy intelligent conversation. Your friend that you are so quick to defend gave none of those--just dismissiveness.

If I get arrested, can you be my attorney, too? :shrug:

Duke
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mudesi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #47
102. I agree
Give it to Clinton. Let's have McCain win. It'll teach those youngsters a lesson or two.

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #47
114. and maybe, OMG, that's a crock of crap. the world is really focusing
now and if you think the SD are going to undo what their constituents did, then I think they would not risk the hell kicking they would get back home. no one has to accept squat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Juche Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 04:59 PM
Response to Original message
57. true
http://www.yda.org/tools/19/youth-statistics

"The 2008 election cycle is crucial to the consolidation of a Democratic youth base. Studies have shown that if a voter casts a ballot for one political party three elections in a row, they are likely to remain a loyal party voter for the rest of their lives. If young voters are mobilized to vote for Democrats in the 2008 election cycle, as they were in 2004 and 2006, we will successfully create a bloc of young voters who make voting – and voting for Democratic candidates – part of their civic identity. But, young people will only turn out when targeted, communicated with, and made to feel included in the process......By 2015, this generation will make up one-third of the electorate"


Obama pulls my generation alot better. However, I think the big risk to the dems is being to pussified. If the dems win huge majorities in the senate, congress and the executive branch and don't do anything (no trials, no investigations, no alt. energy) then the enthusiasm will die.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunnies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #57
59. Excellent post. You make some great points.
And thanks for sharing that stat. 1/3 of the electorate by 2015. Wow. Thats mindblowing.

Its true that Obama, by being the candidate he is, has taken on a lot of responsibility. If he wins this nomination and the Presidency, the future of the party is on his shoulders.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Slagathor Donating Member (244 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 05:11 PM
Response to Original message
61. If Hillary gets the nod, the Democrats lose the future
Hillary is the voice of a failed past, and it's time for these dinosaurs to slump off into the sunset.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
splat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 05:13 PM
Response to Reply #61
62. Sorry, this dino is just peaking
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunnies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #62
65. creepy.
And also: Dino = Democrat In Name Only. Heads up. Im sure thats not what you meant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #61
88. Demosaurs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Slagathor Donating Member (244 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #88
115. DINO-sours (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WolverineDG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 05:16 PM
Response to Original message
64. For the Hillary crowd that doesn't believe this
here's some similarly-worded drivel from a Hillary supporter in the Texas Democratic Party, Chris Bell:

"The last lesson for now has to do with the thousands of young voters who have been drawn into the process because of Barack Obama. I hope it's not a lesson that will drive them away.

Politics is a rough business and things don't always turn out the way we think they should. I don't offer that to be condescending. My greatest fear is that Barack's thousands of young Texas followers will be disenchanted and no longer wish to participate. That would be a real tragedy."

This after he states he made his decision to back Hillary because of her appearance in El Paso. :eyes: So, the Clinton crowd is already aware that this can happen; they just don't give a damn if it does.

dg
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
68. I accept that possibility.
I think Obama is a certain loser, but that nominating him might still be best for the Party long term. It's a damn complicated question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
splat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #68
71. Party's over if women are dissed and Obama loses; kids think he can't lose, but he will
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 05:31 PM
Response to Original message
76. Democrats risk losing four generations...
If insiders are foolish enough to go against the will of the people, many of us will still vote Dem this Nov. in order to keep the Republicans out ~ but then we'll organize a true progressive party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
splat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #76
82. You're going to found the Obama party?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Duke Newcombe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #82
92. Or conduct an "insurgency" in the Democratic Party...
...and purge the deadweight.

Duke
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 07:32 PM
Response to Reply #92
104. I think the powers-that-be know better than to mess with the people's choice this time...
Some heavyweight players have thrown their support behind Obama, Pelosi has spoken out about the supers voting the way of the people ~ and Al Gore & others are waiting in the wings to make sure that the Democratic party behaves in a democratic way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LuvMyPorsche Donating Member (121 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 05:33 PM
Response to Original message
77. hey
bottom line... Obama will NOT win enough delegates to send him to the big dance.

It will come down to the convention and that's like Overtime in football. The first four quarters mean nothing. It's all about the convention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texas_indy Donating Member (432 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #77
103. Wrong analogy. It would be a "coup d’état" by the party elite if the super delegates
don't support the person with the majority of delegates.

Lets see, you state: "It will come down to the convention and that's like Overtime in football. The first four quarters mean nothing."

Every game I've every attended or seen never had the spectators voting and deciding which team gets how many points and when.

I've only seen games where the teams WON points based on the play of the actual TEAM MEMBERS.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
83. On target
and sadly this is most likely what will happen. :-(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkansas Granny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
99. Nobody wants to alienate young voters, but we have to be realistic about something.
Historically, they are the least likely group to turn up at the polls to vote in the GE. I know they are excited right now about Obama and they are turning out in record numbers to vote for him in the primaries, but will that excitement last until November? Will they turn out in sufficient numbers to have a real impact on the GE? I have to give my support on the person I believe is best suited for the position, not on the candidate who may or may not be able to draw a certain group of voters to the polls.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GarbagemanLB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #99
124. So they are more motivated to turn out in the PRIMARIES than the general? I don't get that logic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkansas Granny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 08:32 PM
Response to Reply #124
125. I haven't seen any figures one way or another to show me that their involvement
in the primaries leads to involvement in the GE. Maybe they'll turn out and maybe they won't. Historically, however, young voters consistently have had the lowest percentages of voting turnout in the GE in comparison to other age groups.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RiverStone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 06:43 PM
Response to Original message
101. I agree 200%
As in I really, REALLY think this message must be taken to heart.

If the worst happens, many young and (older) Dems would walk away from the party in utter disgust!

I'll support either nominee (tho prefer BHO) provided that candidate represents the will of the pledged delegates - it would be a disaster if the SD's turned that over - it would fuck with a generation of support if that includes giving the finger to the popular vote on top of that.

We already had one election stolen - I can't fathom our own stealing the next one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 08:04 PM
Response to Original message
119. FYI. The Free Press is one of the largest papers in the Detroit Metro area.
Really, the most widely regarded paper for Democrats in the region.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
metalluk Donating Member (266 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 10:16 PM
Response to Original message
128. Nonsense.
Most Americans have trouble remembering who was the losing candidate in the last General Election, much less those defeated in the primaries. Most Americans still believe that Saddam Hussein was responsible for 9/11. Fifteen percent of Americans think Obama is Muslim. Most Americans can't even hold onto a thought for a week much less a grudge for a generation. You will never go broke underestimating the attention span of the public. Each election has its new issues and new personalities and nobody thinks about what happened four years ago.

Nice try with the transparent scare tactics, however.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scurrilous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 11:29 PM
Response to Original message
129. K & R
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
better tomorrow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 11:32 PM
Response to Original message
130. they could all march in protests like us boomers did back
in the 60's. Don't give up, kids, if it doesn't go your way. There is strength in numbers...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
131. K*R They young voters WILL NOT sit out the eletion if HRC gets it.
They will say a big farewell to the Democratic Party for a while because they will feel betrayed.

They've already been betrayed by the Republicans, who bequeath a world of garbage and few opportunities.

They will join with a guaranteed national third party movement, probably not lead by Obama since
factions in the corporate media is going to continue it's attack of 1000 slashes.

Remember 1992. Perot would have won if he hadn't blown it on a couple of high profile appearances
and statements. He was leading.

You've got those folks, the Perot supporters - essentially populist - and the under 30's and one
lousy situation and voila - 3rd party movement time.

But what can you expect us to do after we get the House and Senate in 2006 and don't do a damn thing
about getting out of Iraq or any of the other atrocities of these monsters in the WH?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Texas Hill Country Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
135. so you support freeper rhetoric when it suits you obama supporters?
such BS... god, i hate the hypocracy!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 11:44 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC