Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hillary Clinton: Exaggerator In Chief

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Bread and Circus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 11:01 AM
Original message
Hillary Clinton: Exaggerator In Chief
On March 9th, I sent this email to the editors of factcheck.org

"Hillary Clinton is making a lot of large claims about her "lifetime of experience" somehow qualifying her for "Commander in Chief". Obama's campaign has called her to task on that.

I've noticed that her claims don't tend to match the record (take her N. Ireland visit for instance), at least in my opinion. However, I could be wrong.

I thought you would have an analysis of her foreign policy claims on your website but I can't find them.

Given you have spent quite a bit of time on matters a lot less essential in terms of picking our next President, I wonder if you could take the time and compare her foreign policy claims (and there are many) versus her actual record.

I wouldn't mind a review of what McCain has actually done as well. Being a POW, while noble in terms of the suffering incurred, doesn't necessarily lend insight on how to lead the Free World.

The Obama campaign is not making any superior claims to foreign policy claims, only judgement. But a review of his activities, positions, and policy advisors would be nice as well.

Thanks for taking the time.

Hopefully, a better educated citizenry will pick the best President"

______________________________________________________________________


To their credit (and not that I had anything to do with it), factcheck.org released this in March 13th

http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/hillarys_adventures_abroad.html

Hillary's Adventures Abroad
March 13, 2008
We find some exaggerations in Clinton's claims of foreign policy experience.

On March 6 Hillary Clinton claimed that, unlike Barack Obama, she and likely Republican nominee John McCain have "cross the commander-in-chief threshold." In a CNN interview the day before, Clinton had listed five foreign policy accomplishments. We can't determine how much behind-the-scenes work Clinton did while first lady, and she certainly took an active interest in foreign policy when her husband was president. Moreover, her time as first lady plus her longer Senate career do give Clinton more foreign policy experience than Obama. But the public record of her actions shows that many of Clinton's foreign policy claims are exaggerated.

______________________________________________________________________

I want to just say thanks to factcheck.org for doing this analysis. I also want to encourage people to email the editors of factcheck.org and thank them or write up their own concerns. I don't know if what I wrote had anything to do with their pursuing the issue. But if it did, that's some encouragement that we can all play a role to help "get things out there".

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
1. Demanding TRUTH is a citizen's duty. Thankyou for exercising that right.
This country needs to renew itself and can only do so with a commitment to Open Government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drachasor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Truly Open Government is one of the biggest reasons to support Obama
It doesn't get talked about nearly enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddiejoan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
3. Very nice
The RW went after Al Gore exactly like this!

You're a real gem!
(I'm exaggerating)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gabeana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. So your saying
only Clinton and her supporters can go after Obama,you such as his percieved lack of experience, were you crying foul when Hillary was glorifying mcCain and her experience against all Obama has is a speech, or the 3:00 am ad, or Obama copying a speech, so you were against all that right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddiejoan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. Nope
and you distort here.

But if one is going to claim that Hillary Clinton is exaggerating her record --I would certainly expect them to acknowledge that Obama is certainly exaggerating his.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gabeana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #8
13. I don't have a problem
if someone from the hillary camp or her supporters points out an exaggeration of Obama thats politics, but from your earlier post it sure sounded like what the OP did was unfair and a RW wing attack. In my opinion and it has been printed in the press that hillary has exaggerated her foreign policy experience and since she is hanging her hat on that, don't you think obama and his supporters have the right to point these exaggerations out. Hillary and her camp have tried to use any edge they can. Again I don't begrudge that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddiejoan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. correcting an exaggeration is fair game
characterizing a candidate as an exaggerator in a political campaign is as worthwhile as saying they are so "full of themselves they think think anyone cares to hear them speak."

It makes no sense --and it turns it into an attack of a personal nature.


All candidates exaggerate their resumes. Your's included.

Feel free to point out any exaggerations, but it is hypocritical to frame a candidate as an "exaggerator".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gabeana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. we have both made our points
by the way i'm curious who is that as your Avatar?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddiejoan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. It's Audrey Tatou
from my favorite movie.

"Amelie"


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gabeana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. Okay thanks,
take care
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reflection Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #17
30. That was a great movie indeed.
Made me feel all warm inside. :hug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drachasor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #6
20. We cry foul when Hillary says McCain has passed the CiC test and Obama hasn't
That's endorsing McCain over Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. Except Hillary really is exaggerating. From bringing peace to Ireland, Opening Kosovo or S-CHIP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddiejoan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. and Obama is not?
:rofl:

This is what candidates for anything do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
4. Hillary invented the printing press as well.
Also electricity. Without Senator Clinton, we would simply not have electricity.

And hula-hoops. She was essentially right in the heart of the planning for the hula-hoop -- both concept design and marketing both.

We owe her a lot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
5. Beware! this may cause a hillarian hissy fit, just like on dKos
gawd forbid they march out of here, leaving us peaceful, respectful, and intent on winning in November.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scurrilous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
9. K & R
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BumRushDaShow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
11. They are still shilling for her.
And it's often difficult to say "we were wrong". But at least they went half-way.

The "experience" nonsense is just that. Nonsense. Clinton supporters have vociferously argued that "time in elected office" doesn't count, so that should take about 8 years off her so-called "experience".

Ironically, the fact that Obama lived overseas for 4 years in Indonesia with a mother who had become fluent in the language, seems lost on people. The fact that he was born and raised in Hawaii - starting a mere 2 years after it became a state, should also count as having lived in an area that was once a foreign land shortly before his birth and even today, it boasts a significant population of both natives and those from other South Pacific islands and Asia.

If anything, Obama has a level of worldliness that underlies his whole being, which would be a great asset in terms of his being a diplomat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unbowed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 11:24 AM
Response to Original message
12. She's using smoke and mirrors, there isn't all that much experience to her credit as she would have
us believe. I've seen Laura Bush talking on television lately, talking to children. Is she going to use that as a basis for running for elected office at some future date?

I wonder.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SunsetDreams Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
14. wow interesting
It seems like Washington Post or New York Times ran with this too, and I know they have been talking about it on MSNBC, and CNN I believe.

Thank you for also asking about McCain and Obama. We need to know about all our candidates for President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cindyw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
19. I think that a Hillary/McCain race would center on this.
And let me tell you that if it worked against a sitting VP, I think it will work against her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bread and Circus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. That's right...the Al Gore "I invented the internet" canard. Al Gore didn't even say that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 09:22 AM
Response to Reply #19
28. Considering Hillary has exaggerated her role in so many things, it'd be pathetic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alteredstate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
22. Here's Bill's senior foreign policy advisor on HRC's foreign policy experience:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bread and Circus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. your link doesnt work. democraticunderground is mispelled I think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alteredstate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. Sorry! Here's the correct link:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bread and Circus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bread and Circus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-16-08 11:26 PM
Response to Original message
26. One last night time bump for the 1 am EST crew.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 12:40 AM
Response to Original message
27. Why is Hillary so reluctant to release those White House records of hers.
I'm sure they must reveal TONS of foreign policy and other experience.

Why is Hillary stone-walling on the release of these records.

Certainly a Clinton wouldn't hide anything from us, would they?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #27
29. Good point. You'd think it's augment her 'experience'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 10:35 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC