|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
GalleryGod (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-11-08 11:38 AM Original message |
What if Obama picked HRC for the next SCOTUS seat ??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lucinda (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-11-08 11:40 AM Response to Original message |
1. She's a problem solver. He's an abstract thinker. He's make a better SCOTUS. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BumRushDaShow (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-11-08 11:41 AM Response to Original message |
2. This would be like Harriet Miers. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RaleighNCDUer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-11-08 11:46 AM Response to Reply #2 |
11. You shouldn't have to be a judge, but lacking that experience you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Q3JR4 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-11-08 11:59 AM Response to Reply #2 |
19. Actually the constitution lists |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-11-08 11:42 AM Response to Original message |
3. She's for CLOSED GOVERNMENT and secrecy and shouldn't be in WH or on the Supreme Court. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mythyc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-11-08 11:42 AM Response to Original message |
4. Does she have enough experience? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shadowknows69 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-11-08 11:42 AM Response to Original message |
5. At least we know Roe V Wade would be safe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HiFructosePronSyrup (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-11-08 11:43 AM Response to Original message |
6. That would be a ridiculously bad decision to make. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
high density (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-11-08 11:43 AM Response to Original message |
7. Ideologically she's fine |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RaleighNCDUer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-11-08 11:43 AM Response to Original message |
8. She's too much of a pragmatist - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Barack_America (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-11-08 11:48 AM Response to Reply #8 |
14. Hmm. That's a good point. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dinger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-11-08 11:45 AM Response to Original message |
9. From Looking On This Forum, Obama Supporters Don't Want HER For Anything. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RaleighNCDUer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-11-08 11:49 AM Response to Reply #9 |
16. Hey, she's welcome to keep the job she's got. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-11-08 12:07 PM Response to Reply #9 |
24. I'd like her for VP, Sen. Majority Leader, or Sec'y of HHS. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hedgehog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-11-08 11:45 AM Response to Original message |
10. In principal, it's a good idea. You don't even have to be a lawyer to be appointed to the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pscot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-11-08 11:47 AM Response to Original message |
12. Too much of a corporatist for my taste |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JVS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-11-08 11:47 AM Response to Original message |
13. The republicans in congress would bounce her out of the confirmation hearings before she could be... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Captain Hilts (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-11-08 11:49 AM Response to Original message |
15. LOSER between BO and HRC gets on the Supreme Court. Fair trade. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
scheming daemons (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-11-08 11:49 AM Response to Original message |
17. Is she qualified? Then sure... no problem...... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BuyingThyme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-11-08 11:57 AM Response to Original message |
18. She's way too dishonest for me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
David Zephyr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-11-08 12:01 PM Response to Original message |
20. This Obama supporter thinks it would be a good thing, but Hillary would have to pull out now. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Not the Only One (617 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-11-08 12:03 PM Response to Original message |
21. We can do much better than Hillary for SCOTUS. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
InAbLuEsTaTe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-11-08 12:04 PM Response to Original message |
22. So many better qualified candidates, but no strong objections. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-11-08 12:06 PM Response to Original message |
23. She's totally unqualified. She's never been a judge. She's not a Constitutional scholar. She's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Benhurst (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-11-08 12:10 PM Response to Original message |
25. If even a thousanth of what Obama's supporters have been saying about her is true, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftofthedial (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-11-08 12:26 PM Response to Original message |
26. just what the SCOTUS needs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GalleryGod (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-11-08 01:46 PM Response to Original message |
27. Well Mario Cuomo turned down Bill for SCOTUS that went to Breyer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue May 07th 2024, 09:26 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC