Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why is Pres. election the only race not decided by popular vote?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
bigwillq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-13-04 05:05 PM
Original message
Why is Pres. election the only race not decided by popular vote?
Or are there other races determined by something similar to the Electoral college?

Why is our highest office not decided by the people?
Things that make you go hmmmm....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sangh0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-13-04 05:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. I think it's a little thing
known as "The Constitution"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigwillq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-13-04 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Just cause it's in the Constitution
doesn't mean it's right. To me, that's one thing I don't agree with. Don't know if I ever will.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sangh0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-13-04 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. No, but it means it's the law
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigwillq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-13-04 05:38 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. I know, I know
The rain has fallen on my parade! Boo-Hoo!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigwillq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-13-04 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. Ok so I don't sound like a total moran, I know
why the Pres. election is determined using the Electoral college but the "WHY" in my thread eludes to the errors that may occur like in 2000. Why do we still use this system and why shouldn't the people just decide by the popular vote, I guess is more in the way of the answers I want.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robcon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-13-04 05:10 PM
Response to Original message
2. Read the Federalist papers
and find out why.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-13-04 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
3. because the electoral college was created by the founders to make
sure a rabble wouldn't take over a presidential election.
Like 2000 in Florida. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigwillq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-13-04 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. If they only knew
Even before 2000, I still don't think that system makes much sense. Why not just let the people of America decide one clear winner.

But I guess the REPUKES wouldn't like it this way. Remember Bush never won a People's Choice Award (well, I guess in Texas but....)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ACK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-13-04 05:25 PM
Response to Original message
6. Founding Fathers did not trust the common people
To make such an important decision.

Things have gotten better though the electors use to be assigned by the state legislatures I believe kind of like the Senate was back in the day.

Alexander Hamilton was always the one usually pointed out as deathly afraid of the tyranny of the rabble masses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gothmog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-13-04 05:42 PM
Response to Original message
10. The Senate used to be elected by State legislatures
The Constitution has evolved. The Senate used to be elected by the state legislatures but over the years, direct votes became the norm.

The electoral colleges actually discriminates against voters in the larger states in that their votes are in effect worth less than a vote in Wyoming or S. Dakota.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigwillq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-13-04 05:45 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. So why not just have a popular vote?
When I first learned about the EC I thought it was used to help the smaller states but with your claim that it actually hurts the larger states, why not let the popular vote rule?

For discussion purposes only, I know they will never change the EC!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bombtrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-13-04 05:44 PM
Response to Original message
11. Because the presidential election is the great comprimise
between state and federal power. Without the electoral college, both states and parts of states with smaller populations and spread out/rural populations would be ignored. All the campaigning would be done in the biggest metro areas such as NY, LA, Chicago, Philidelphia, Houston etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
James T. Kirk Donating Member (916 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-13-04 05:53 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. Bingo!
I agree with Bombtrack's answer.

The electoral college also has the effect of compartmentalizing extreme results. Suppose for example, there was massive vote fraud in, let's say, Idaho. Even if they somehow "found" an extra million votes from dead people, pets and invisible friends, it would not throw the national election too far out of whack.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigwillq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-13-04 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. OK, a valid reason to keep the EC
Because the candidate who won Idaho b/c of all those other 'votes' would still only get the # of EC votes for that state. Thanks for participating in my little thread!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SheilaT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-13-04 05:44 PM
Response to Original message
12. Until 1913 Senators were elected
by their state legislatures.

The Founding Fathers didn't have quite the same rosy-eyed view of the common man as capable of electing his leaders as we do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-13-04 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
14. Senators were not elected by popular vote until 1913
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-13-04 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
17. I think the electoral college will help us greatly this election
If things were just decided by popular vote then Diebold could just increase chimps numbers slightly all over the country to win him the election and the increases would be so small that nobody would notice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigwillq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-13-04 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Another good reason to keep the EC (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scarface2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-13-04 06:07 PM
Response to Original message
19. that s a damn good question!!
the constitution, which never will, needs to be changed on this. i live in texas in a congressional district that doesnt even have a dem on the ticket.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigwillq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-13-04 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. I always had reservations about the EC
but some people here have real valid points as to why we should keep it. The reason I started this thread was to get an idea of what other people think on this subject.

BTW, congrats on 400 posts!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-13-04 07:03 PM
Response to Original message
21. It was created to give standing to the small rural states!
It was established when travel was quite difficult and they wanted to make sure a Presidential candidate didn't only go to the BIG populations states and totaly ignore the sparsely populated rural ones.

Even though today, travel is not a problem, they could still only pay attention to the North East and West Coast and all those states in the middle would have no say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 09:17 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC