|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
JMDEM (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 07:13 PM Original message |
Would Hillary be banned from DU? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hisownpetard (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 07:14 PM Response to Original message |
1. Absolutely. (Don't remember who, but someone said this before). |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
againes654 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 07:19 PM Response to Reply #1 |
5. You probably mean someone else, but I said it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Samantha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 08:40 PM Response to Reply #1 |
60. I said she would be tombstoned |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hisownpetard (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 09:47 PM Response to Reply #60 |
64. Yeah, that's where I saw it - and I totally agree with both of you on that score. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stevenleser (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 09:54 PM Response to Reply #1 |
70. I did. There is no question that she would have broken the rules... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
backscatter712 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 07:17 PM Response to Original message |
2. Why'd the thread suggesting Clinton get an honorary tombstone get locked? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Omaha Steve (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 07:33 PM Response to Reply #2 |
13. It suggested the death of a D in NY, but I'm not a mod |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stevenleser (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 09:52 PM Response to Reply #2 |
68. I am the OP of that thread, and I was upset it was locked |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kittycat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 07:18 PM Response to Original message |
3. Hillary W. McLieberman |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mtnsnake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 07:20 PM Response to Reply #3 |
8. Are you by any chance a Republican? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kittycat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 07:44 PM Original message |
Are you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SKKY (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 07:18 PM Response to Original message |
4. I think that McCain comment would at the very least get her a very... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maddy McCall (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 07:19 PM Response to Original message |
6. Of course not. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Evergreen Emerald (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 07:20 PM Response to Original message |
7. Obama promoted REagan over Clinton--but, of course there are |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 07:22 PM Response to Reply #7 |
9. Stop repeating that lie that only the Monster and her lapdogs repeat |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Evergreen Emerald (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 07:31 PM Response to Reply #9 |
11. So, when Obama praises Reagan--he was just citing historical fact |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 07:33 PM Response to Reply #11 |
15. Typical Hillarista twisting of words. You are just full of shit! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Evergreen Emerald (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 07:35 PM Response to Reply #15 |
16. more double standard. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
davidinalameda (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 10:36 PM Response to Reply #15 |
77. don't let them get to you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hepburn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 08:30 PM Response to Reply #11 |
55. Hello? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hell-bent (593 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 07:33 PM Response to Reply #9 |
12. What does "transformational" mean? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Evergreen Emerald (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 07:36 PM Response to Reply #9 |
17. Wow. You have dehumanized a progressive, intelligent |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 07:44 PM Response to Reply #17 |
25. The Monster voted against a ban on cluster bombs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hepburn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 08:36 PM Response to Reply #17 |
57. LOL.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Evergreen Emerald (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 09:12 PM Response to Reply #57 |
63. Do you honestly believe your distortions? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
awaysidetraveler (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 09:51 PM Response to Reply #63 |
66. Liberals aren't so open minded about cluster bombs or pro-torture votes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
againes654 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 10:35 PM Response to Reply #17 |
76. Her WHOLE life?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JVS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 07:37 PM Response to Reply #7 |
18. Reagan has been out of politics for many years and dead for a few. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Evergreen Emerald (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 07:37 PM Response to Reply #18 |
19. If you do not understand the issue, why even post? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JVS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 07:44 PM Response to Reply #19 |
24. Reagan is a non issue. Your candidate fluffing McCain is a major issue. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hell-bent (593 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 08:31 PM Response to Reply #24 |
56. fluffing? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
apocalypsehow (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 07:44 PM Response to Reply #19 |
26. Reading is obviously not your area of expertise, but I'll try to distill it down to the basics: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Evergreen Emerald (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 07:50 PM Response to Reply #26 |
29. I see that double standards are your strong point. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
apocalypsehow (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 07:53 PM Response to Reply #29 |
35. There is not a "double standard" in sight: nice try. Go back and re-read my post above. Take it slow |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BigBearJohn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 09:55 PM Response to Reply #29 |
71. Evergreen Emerald -- I agree with you utterly and completely! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hisownpetard (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 09:52 PM Response to Reply #26 |
69. "Senator Clinton, on the other hand, openly embraced & endorsed a living, breathing Republican..." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
apocalypsehow (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 07:38 PM Response to Reply #7 |
20. Funny, I wasn't aware Reagan had been resurrected from the dead, nor that he was now actively |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Evergreen Emerald (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 07:42 PM Response to Reply #20 |
23. There you go--good job. When you lose on the facts... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
apocalypsehow (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 07:46 PM Response to Reply #23 |
27. My post was right on point - yours, eh, not so much. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Evergreen Emerald (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 07:51 PM Response to Reply #27 |
32. Your post is nothing but illogical |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
apocalypsehow (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 07:56 PM Response to Reply #32 |
37. Ah, and now comes the grubby little ad hominem attacks. Typical. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Evergreen Emerald (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 08:00 PM Response to Reply #37 |
40. I was repeating in kind |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
apocalypsehow (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 08:03 PM Response to Reply #40 |
42. No, you weren't. Do you know what "ad hominem" means? Like I said, reading seems to be an area in |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Evergreen Emerald (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 08:05 PM Response to Reply #42 |
45. really? Your holier than thou smart ass posts are nothing more than |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
apocalypsehow (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 08:08 PM Response to Reply #45 |
47. And your repeated personal attacks are a sure sign of someone without anything coherent left to say. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Evergreen Emerald (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 08:13 PM Original message |
actually, I had quite a bit to say, but you devolved this conversation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
apocalypsehow (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 08:22 PM Response to Original message |
53. I "devolved" the conversation! Wow, I'm good! ... Actually, what you had to say was proven wrong - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hell-bent (593 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 08:16 PM Response to Reply #20 |
50. No, it's not a miracle; |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
apocalypsehow (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 09:56 PM Response to Reply #50 |
72. That's got to be the dumbest post I've ever read on the internet. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
againes654 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 10:33 PM Response to Reply #7 |
75. He didn't actually promote him |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hell-bent (593 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 07:23 PM Response to Original message |
10. No, I think you should |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JMDEM (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 07:33 PM Response to Reply #10 |
14. Why? It clearly violates the DU rules as I understand them. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hell-bent (593 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 07:50 PM Response to Reply #14 |
31. What nerve could that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 07:39 PM Response to Original message |
21. Only if she posted what she said |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 07:51 PM Response to Reply #21 |
33. Several Here Have Posted Exactly What She Said, In Their Own Words. They Weren't TS'd. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 07:59 PM Response to Reply #33 |
38. Did you alert on them? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 08:00 PM Response to Reply #38 |
41. Why Would I? Their Comments Were Perfectly Fine In Context. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 08:03 PM Response to Reply #41 |
43. Yes it is certainly not foolish to praise a republican over a democrat |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 08:07 PM Response to Reply #43 |
46. Get A Grip For Chrissakes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BleedingHeartPatriot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 07:39 PM Response to Original message |
22. LOL. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ozone_man (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 07:47 PM Response to Original message |
28. I think according to DU rules |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hell-bent (593 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 07:59 PM Response to Reply #28 |
39. Well, you will be |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ozone_man (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 08:13 PM Response to Reply #39 |
49. Or maybe I should vote for McCain? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 07:50 PM Response to Original message |
30. No She Hasn't And No She Wouldn't. Any Other Ridiculously Twisted And Nonsensical Questions To Ask? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KoKo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 07:51 PM Response to Original message |
34. WORD... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ozone_man (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 08:04 PM Response to Reply #34 |
44. That was cute. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Seabiscuit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 07:54 PM Response to Original message |
36. So "promoted" is the new Obamanoid buzzword for "endorsed"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Thurston Howell III (576 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 08:09 PM Response to Original message |
48. No but Lee Mercer would! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JMDEM (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 08:18 PM Response to Original message |
51. The fact that Hillary supporters aren't aghast at this move |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Poll_Blind (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 08:22 PM Response to Original message |
52. I was going to say yes, but only the 2nd time she said it. But after thinking about it... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
InAbLuEsTaTe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 08:25 PM Response to Original message |
54. Hillary's probably on DU under an assumed name bashing Obama. I think I know who she's posing as. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hell-bent (593 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 08:36 PM Response to Reply #54 |
58. Can you let us |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skinner ADMIN (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 08:38 PM Response to Original message |
59. No, she wouldn't. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stop the bleeding (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 09:49 PM Response to Reply #59 |
65. What? You endorsed McCain or agreed with what Senator Clinton said? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cbayer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 08:41 PM Response to Original message |
61. No, she would not. nt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Unbowed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 08:57 PM Response to Original message |
62. Nah, not until she actually pulls a Lieberman and runs against the democratic nominee |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Johnny__Motown (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 09:52 PM Response to Original message |
67. Yep. this video is the proof |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
awaysidetraveler (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 10:05 PM Response to Original message |
73. Any definitive answers on this one yet? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
awaysidetraveler (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 10:27 PM Response to Original message |
74. Proof that she would not be banned from DU: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
suston96 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 10:52 PM Response to Original message |
78. "Actively promoted"? What crap......nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon May 06th 2024, 08:38 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC