Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What should happen to Florida and Michigan?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Seabiscuit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 11:19 AM
Original message
Poll question: What should happen to Florida and Michigan?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
EmperorHasNoClothes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. They dug themselves in, now they need to dig themselves out
If they want to be counted they need to pay for new primaries or caucuses. There's no other fair way to handle this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VotesForWomen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. they? when "they" don't come out and vote in the GE, *we* lose. but as long as O's the nominee,
it doesn't matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seabiscuit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
2. Does anyone know
what Hillary was talking about when she said the Democrats in Florida had nothing to do with violating DNC rules when they set the date for their primary, because the Republican governor and Republican legislature set the primary date?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seabiscuit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
3. This appears to be the least popular poll I've ever put up here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ScreamingMeemie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
4. Yeah...to hell with "We the People"... "We the People" should
be penalized.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ButterflyBlood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 03:10 PM
Response to Original message
6. The state pays for new primaries
The DNC shouldn't have to foot the bill for rule breakers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slick8790 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 03:10 PM
Response to Original message
7. Other. Split them right down the middle n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seabiscuit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Now *there's* a way to enfranchise the voters.
Just another way of refusing to seat any of their delegates under any circumstances.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SKKY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. I think that's probably the best solution...
...if the states don't want to foot the bill, split the delegates 50/50. Either way, I don't think the Candidates should be penalized for the ineptitude of each states party officials.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kerry-is-my-prez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
8. Make the Republican Party pay for it in Fla - since they are mainly at fault.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seabiscuit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Since they won't, here's the solution I'd favor:
Edited on Fri Mar-07-08 05:24 PM by Seabiscuit
Re: Florida: Validate the primary election that was held and seat the delegates, since it was the Republicans, not the Democrats that forced Florida into an early primary in violation of the DNC's rules.

Re: Michigan: Make Michigan pay for a new primary if they want any delegates seated, otherwise, don't seat them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VolcanoJen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 05:26 PM
Response to Original message
12. Clinton advisor Harold Ickes voted to strip Michigan and Florida of their delegates.
Edited on Fri Mar-07-08 05:27 PM by VolcanoJen
Make him pay for the mulligan, then.

Harold Ickes: "With respect to the stripping, I voted as a member of the Democratic National Committee. Those were our rules and I felt I had an obligation to enforce them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OnceUponTimeOnTheNet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 05:34 PM
Response to Original message
13. Other. Speaking from MI, my state should do a caucus to get the regular delegates seated.
A caucus is much cheaper than a primary to redo, Obama was not on the ballot in the first vote, my states democratic superdelegates were instrumental in fucking up our early votes this year, these dipwits have since endorsed Clinton, hence ~ THROW my superdelegates in the DITCH, Please and Thank You Dr. Dean.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VolcanoJen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. We should all listen to what Michigan citizens think.
Great post, OnceUpon!

Firehouse caucuses makes sense to me, especially in Michigan. No ballots to print, no poll workers to hire, and me and a dozen of my friends could pull that shit together in six weeks.

If you guys need a hand in Michigan, let this Buckeye know. :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OnceUponTimeOnTheNet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. Thanks Jen. Caucuses really are cheap compared to a primary, et it would resolve this problem.
I just hope she drops out, before my State really does have to do a redo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 05:39 PM
Response to Original message
15. The upside to having a new vote is that it drags out the nomination contest even longer.
I like the marathon aspect of this race. Candidates need to have their endurance tested. This year seems to do that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progdog Donating Member (435 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 05:47 PM
Response to Original message
16. Split them by percentage
according to all the candidates that were still in the race at the time of those primaries. Then let those candidates make the choice. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 06:51 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC