Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

OBAMA 1279 - CLINTON 1304 Delegates

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Buve Donating Member (106 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 04:18 AM
Original message
OBAMA 1279 - CLINTON 1304 Delegates
Based on the numbers so far it takes Clinton 10150 to get a delegate and Obama 9509 votes.

if we do a little roleplay and reverse those costs....


OBAMA delegates at CLINTON cost = 1279
CLINTON delegates at OBAMA cost = 1304


what does a girl have to do to get ahead?


(source www.realclearpolitics.com . votes (Without FL) over pledged)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
WheresMyVoice Donating Member (54 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 04:19 AM
Response to Original message
1. THIS IS "THE" MATH!!
Hill yes! She's ahead!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftCoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 04:21 AM
Response to Original message
2. I support Clinton, but I don't see this as a strong argument.
Each campaign has to make strategic decisions about how and where they will campaign. In this case, either through accident or purpose, the Obama team seems to have found an advantage in the system. Seems fair game to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HCE SuiGeneris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 04:22 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. The two above posters are trolls having a little fun. Don't get too excited
about their "facts".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buve Donating Member (106 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 04:28 AM
Response to Reply #2
13. psssst

its a popular vote argument
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftCoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 04:33 AM
Response to Reply #13
20. I realize that.
I still feel it's a weak argument.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kid a Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 04:21 AM
Response to Original message
3. thats just fucked up
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spider Jerusalem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 04:22 AM
Response to Original message
4. Per RCP: Obama, 1366, Clinton 1222 (pledged); Obama 1573, Clinton 1464 (total).
I have no idea where you got those numbers, but you're aparently just making things up.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/democratic_delegate_count.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buve Donating Member (106 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 04:31 AM
Response to Reply #4
18. reading FTL


popular vote / pledged delegates = cost of delegate for each canidate.


NOW! Take clinton cost and turn it into obama cost and visa versa.



popular vote / cost of opponent = new delegate total!

YAY! RED STATES PICK OUR DELEGATE TOO!


OMG its 2000 all over again and Gore wins the popular and loses the election. You think Obama will win the democrats after that?!?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spider Jerusalem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 04:38 AM
Response to Reply #18
28. I think you're a moron.
States which determine delegates by caucus have lower voter turnout than states which select their delegates through a primary process. If Hillary was unable to win the caucus states, it's the fault of her campaign's poor organisation. This is the system we have; it's too bad if you don't like it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 04:22 AM
Response to Original message
6. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 04:27 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 04:24 AM
Response to Original message
7. WHat does she have to do to get ahead? How bout not embrace a fucked up strategy
One where she largely ignored Caucus states so that he would get 65+ in them and run up the score.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HCE SuiGeneris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 04:25 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Buve, WheresMyVoice and SnowBot are trolls. Indulge them if you want.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WheresMyVoice Donating Member (54 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 04:27 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Excuse me??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snowbot Donating Member (33 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 04:27 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. Apparently we're trolls
I hope the Clintonista doesn't stone us to death.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JTFrog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 04:33 AM
Response to Reply #12
21. It is quite apparent, isn't it. No stoning here, just a good showing of your ass.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 04:36 AM
Response to Reply #21
24. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
JTFrog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 04:37 AM
Response to Reply #24
25. I guess you don't read either. I'm not a Hillbot. Enjoy your stay.
Troll.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snowbot Donating Member (33 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 04:37 AM
Response to Reply #25
26. Oh I will
You can bet on that, friend.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JTFrog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 04:39 AM
Response to Reply #26
29. Fortunately it will be quite short.
And trust me, I don't have friends like you. You can bet on your granite cookie. It's the best bet for your money at this point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snowbot Donating Member (33 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 04:40 AM
Response to Reply #29
30. Whatever you say friend.
I'll be around for a long time. But thanks for the warm wishes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JTFrog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 04:44 AM
Response to Reply #30
32. Yeah, it was hours the last time someone said that. We're already on to you and your disgusting
posting habits. You may have changed out your graphic thinking it will save your ass, but you've been called on your sexist crap and you can expect to get called on and alerted on every time you do it. I'm sure this will be a little different than your experience at freeperville.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HCE SuiGeneris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 04:28 AM
Response to Reply #9
14. No. No excuse for you. I have forwarded your many positions
attacking both Obama and Clinton
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WheresMyVoice Donating Member (54 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 04:32 AM
Response to Reply #14
19. I have not attacked ANYONE
Edited on Thu Mar-06-08 04:32 AM by WheresMyVoice
Show me the ad hominem. Ridiculous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HCE SuiGeneris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 04:44 AM
Response to Reply #19
31. Here you go....
"Hill has more scandals than any in the GOP. Makes Tom DeLay look like kid stuff

Luckily Obama is a gentleman" http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=132&topic_id=4920012#4922617

"Yep

Hill goes down -- cackle and all." http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=132&topic_id=4895895#4922607

"Using THE math

This race is tied -- slight edge for ~ THE LADY ! ~" Using THE math http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=132&topic_id=4922078#4922925

"La la la

Obama-biased math doesn't faze me.

FIRED UP FOR THE LADY~" http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=132&topic_id=4922865#4922889


Rather inconsistent and troll-like, no?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 04:27 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. I know
Edited on Thu Mar-06-08 04:27 AM by hnmnf
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JTFrog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 04:29 AM
Response to Reply #8
17. Reincarnation is quite popular this time of year. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HooptieWagon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 04:28 AM
Response to Original message
15. She started out with
100% name recognition, millions in corporate donations, Bill's "buddies list", and 150 superdelegates in hand. If she couldn't get the nomination with that head start, then maybe she's just not a good enough politician.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 04:29 AM
Response to Original message
16. Whaaa! Can you count? Do you make any sense at all?
Besides, many caucus votes aren't popular votes, they are delegates.

Lame.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buve Donating Member (106 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 04:35 AM
Response to Reply #16
22. imo
She wins the popular and he wins the nomination....

i write her in... I'm in a mostly blue state (2000,2004) It "should" stay blue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WheresMyVoice Donating Member (54 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 04:36 AM
Response to Reply #22
23. Hill is way ahead in the pop. vote
That much is true
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JTFrog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 04:53 AM
Response to Reply #23
33. No. It's not. I take it math was not your best subject in school.
Where in the hell are you pulling your numbers? Even with Florida counted Obama has more votes. The only way Clinton has more is if you count Michigan where Obama wasn't even on the fucking ballot.

Do you deal in reality at all or just post at whim? Please link to your numbers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FlyingTiger Donating Member (340 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 04:38 AM
Response to Original message
27. So, I assume you've done a lot to try to get rid of the Electoral College in your time.
Considering it creates the exact same sort of math.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buve Donating Member (106 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 05:27 AM
Response to Reply #27
34. Agreed
Edited on Thu Mar-06-08 05:30 AM by Buve
But if we win OH and AR while holding all 2004 states minus WI and NM. Hilllary Wins!! Yay! \o/!

How does Obama hold OH and MI after getting trounced on the economy in these states?



Secondly tell my why ND should get a 25:1 delegate to voter advantage over TX when the state has gone to R's in 27 of the last 32 presidential elections?!?

Why should ND democrats get a huge advantage when they can NEVER get their state to go Dem? Texas has gone 27 Dem to 11 Repub in it's history?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 05:35 AM
Response to Original message
35. become a republican and win the winner-take-all primaries..oh wait..
that might not pan out either..

the "girl" should just follow the rules that have been in place since the 80s.. those rules worked out ok for her husband:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 05:42 AM
Response to Original message
36. Oooh, math without understanding statistics and set theory!
We totally need a pro-education candidate, because this is, well, "less than complete".

Why is bubble sort wrong?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RBInMaine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 07:28 AM
Response to Original message
37. Go back to school and learn how to do math.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dogmudgeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 07:33 AM
Response to Original message
38. Team Obama: Math You Can Count On
Edited on Thu Mar-06-08 07:34 AM by Pigwidgeon
No more politics as usual.

Math. Rules. Order. Discipline!

And lots of hatred for your rivals.

--p!
Turn the TV off and do your homework, junior.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 07:35 AM
Response to Original message
39. You forgot that she gets 100 free delegates when she whines
Rewriting the rules...another Clintonian talent...

:puke:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 11:58 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC