Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

New US president: The India factor

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
OhioChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 08:31 PM
Original message
New US president: The India factor
Wednesday, March 5, 2008 (Washington)
As the US Presidential election is reaching to a decisive phase, many in India debate as to which party will be good for the country once the final results are declared.

While most Indians are supporting the Democrats in their battle against Republicans for the White House, ironically, analysts say Republicans are probably better for India on issues ranging from outsourcing to the nuclear deal.

Democrat Presidential hopefuls Barak Obama and Hillary Clinton are known for their opposition to the nuclear deal. In fact, Obama was one of several Democrat senators who tabled what were called ''killer amendments'' to kill the deal.

Democrats also lean against outsourcing to India. Obama has said, ''We have to stop providing tax breaks for companies that are shipping jobs overseas.''

Obama also rubbed Indians the wrong way when his campaign staff called Hillary the senator from Punjab because of her close ties with the community.

Republican John McCain, on the other hand, has suggested that India should replace Russia in the G-8.

Almost every member of the Republican Party has backed the Indo-US nuclear deal and with his Republican free market economic policies McCain is not against outsourcing.

America's India policy is now stable and strong but it's clear that Democrats will be a little tougher on some aspects of Indo-US relations than the Republicans.

http://www.ndtv.com/convergence/ndtv/story.aspx?id=NEWEN20080043189&ch=3/5/2008%2011:50:00%20PM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 08:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. So do you do any non India-related outsourcing posts?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OhioChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 08:35 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Sure Do.
This is an important issue for many.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChromeFoundry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 12:04 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. Hasn't this been addressed in the past for your exclusive benefit?
I think the OP has explained her views on why Indian outsourcing hits closest home to her situation... repeatedly! If you have something to add, then please add. If all you are trying to do is start an argument without any logical debate, then please visit one of the kiddy's gaming forums (abundantly available on every corner of the Internet).

If you have ever followed the OP's threads on here, you'd understand that she equally has a problem with the outsourcing of US jobs to Mexico, China, Vietnam and the wide variety of other destinations ripe to exploit their masses through the enslavement of cheap labor. The OP is an asset to this board and the US labor force. You are proving to be just another blip on the radar screen of disrupter.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=102&topic_id=3200346#3201213

If you disagree, add something to it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
surfermaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 08:39 PM
Response to Original message
3. Reagan & Bush sold us down the river where India is concerned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peoli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 08:41 PM
Response to Original message
4. They clearly havent seen this!....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OhioChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. I Was Watching That Video
and on the left under "Related Videos" was This. :rofl:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DlkxQMxJmEU&feature=related
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 12:05 AM
Response to Original message
7. Why didn't Obama run with this in Ohio?
Dammit, he could've CREAMED her with this. Instead he went with the factually ambiguous flyer and look where that got him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 01:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC