|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
althecat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 02:57 AM Original message |
Is it just me that thinks that the vote count in Ohio and Texas looks decidedly fishy.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GetTheRightVote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 02:58 AM Response to Original message |
1. I was wondering about those myself and yes it is fishy .... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Horse with no Name (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 02:59 AM Response to Original message |
2. You forget one thing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anigbrowl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 03:00 AM Response to Original message |
3. Don't worry about it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
casus belli (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 03:01 AM Response to Original message |
4. And who is orchestrating said evil plot? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
althecat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 03:39 AM Response to Reply #4 |
23. How bout this guy :) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CalGator (517 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 03:01 AM Response to Original message |
5. this is why caucuses work |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
amborin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 03:06 AM Response to Reply #5 |
11. when they show up to get their arms twisted, like in Iowa? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue_Roses (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 09:29 AM Response to Reply #11 |
49. I didn't see any arm twisting last night at my caucus here in Texas |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 03:23 AM Response to Reply #5 |
16. nonsense |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClayZ (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 03:45 AM Response to Reply #5 |
26. Yup! Argh! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elehhhhna (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 07:53 AM Response to Reply #5 |
34. CalGator, you nailed it. But caucuses onlt allot 30% of TX delegates. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 06:27 PM Response to Reply #5 |
55. You Mean The Caucus System That Excludes Working Folks, Physically Challenged People And The Elderly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 03:01 AM Response to Original message |
6. Deleted message |
amborin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 03:03 AM Response to Reply #6 |
9. i was waiting for the vote fraud allegations from the obama crew |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
catgirl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 08:08 AM Response to Reply #9 |
37. Dennis K. alleged vote fraud in NH |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stevepol (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 04:50 AM Response to Reply #6 |
28. No matter who wins any election in the US today |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
windbreeze (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 10:19 AM Response to Reply #28 |
50. Since at least 2000, every election, primary, etc., has brought |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kurovski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 05:29 AM Response to Reply #6 |
29. Eat shit, asswipe. Al has been watching out for fraud for more years |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
woolldog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 03:01 AM Response to Original message |
7. Bradley effect? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadBadger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 03:02 AM Response to Original message |
8. Those were first wave numbers. HOWEVER the original Exit Polls fucked up Rhode Island big time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
catgirl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 08:12 AM Response to Reply #8 |
38. Final polls done before the voting even started had HRC up by 5 in RI |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OnTheOtherHand (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 09:03 AM Response to Reply #38 |
45. not really "polls" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
catgirl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 09:15 AM Response to Reply #45 |
46. I'm referring to all the RI polls showing Obama closing the gap |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OnTheOtherHand (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 12:07 PM Response to Reply #46 |
51. "all the RI polls"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dailykoff (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 03:04 AM Response to Original message |
10. The experts at EMR and CNN would tell us if there was anything fishy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 03:17 AM Response to Original message |
12. Ohio didn't surprise me, TX did. Clinton was awesome in TX, but I |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Oilwellian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 03:21 AM Response to Reply #12 |
14. She wasn't all that awesome |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blogslut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 03:25 AM Response to Reply #12 |
17. The caucuses are still being tallied |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LibertyorDeath (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 03:32 AM Response to Reply #17 |
18. Thanks that's great news ! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blogslut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 03:34 AM Response to Reply #18 |
19. Yes, it is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anamandujano (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 03:50 AM Response to Reply #12 |
27. The caucuses represent a tiny fraction of the people, so you can play |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
soothsayer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 07:23 AM Response to Reply #12 |
33. weren't repubs allowed to vote in the dem primary in texas? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rcsl1998 (501 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 06:28 PM Response to Reply #12 |
56. Obama Fatigue |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skittles (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 03:19 AM Response to Original message |
13. if you haven't figured it out yet |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lligrd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 03:22 AM Response to Reply #13 |
15. Funny, They Used To Work Quite Well |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BigDDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 09:27 AM Response to Reply #15 |
48. Thanks! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 03:37 AM Response to Reply #13 |
21. Have you figured out who you support yet? Just asking, because |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BzaDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 03:35 AM Response to Original message |
20. Those aren't the final exit poll numbers. The final exit poll numbers put both TX and OH w/Hillary. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
althecat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 03:37 AM Response to Reply #20 |
22. The final numbers adjust the story to fit the result.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BzaDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 03:39 AM Response to Reply #22 |
24. No No No. I'm not talking about the numbers currently up there. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
althecat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 03:44 AM Response to Reply #24 |
25. She needed to be ahead in exit polls in Texas as Obama started with a 100k lead in early votes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BzaDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 05:54 AM Response to Reply #25 |
31. Argh... so much wrong information. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 08:57 AM Response to Reply #25 |
41. Even these numbers indicate Clinton wins to me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OnTheOtherHand (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 08:57 AM Response to Reply #24 |
40. not necessarily sound for TX |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BrightKnight (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 05:46 AM Response to Original message |
30. . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MiniMe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 06:51 AM Response to Original message |
32. Do they count early voting in the exit polls? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OnTheOtherHand (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 08:24 AM Response to Reply #32 |
39. often the pollsters do telephone interviews |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OnTheOtherHand (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 08:01 AM Response to Original message |
35. what, are you KIDDING? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
catgirl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 08:04 AM Response to Original message |
36. MSM reported that RI, OH and TX were going to be very close |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MoonRiver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 08:59 AM Response to Original message |
42. Yawn, how predictable. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dailykoff (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 05:59 PM Response to Reply #42 |
52. As a matter of fact I've been predicting it for weeks. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShaneGR (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 08:59 AM Response to Original message |
43. Ok, so if they vote for Obama they want change, HRC its vast conspiracy? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LostinVA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 09:00 AM Response to Original message |
44. Knock it off |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
suston96 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 09:20 AM Response to Original message |
47. The first numbers posted in Texas were hundreds of thousands of votes - some 700, 000... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kurovski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 06:15 PM Response to Reply #47 |
53. Clinton pulled ahead? Of Obama? I'm confused... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rcsl1998 (501 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 06:25 PM Response to Original message |
54. I Can Only Comment On RI... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 06:29 PM Response to Original message |
57. Can We Put Raw Exit Polls To Rest? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NMMNG (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 06:32 PM Response to Original message |
58. May I suggest tin-foil-hats and Haldol? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kurovski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 06:47 PM Response to Reply #58 |
59. Some Obama stuff is looking odd as well, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NMMNG (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 06:55 PM Response to Reply #59 |
60. Oh no, Obama would never do anything utoward! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kurovski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-05-08 07:24 PM Response to Reply #60 |
61. When is it NOT interesting? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 04th 2024, 06:21 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC