Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Tonight was a watershed moment for Hillary...here's why

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Justice Is Comin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 01:49 AM
Original message
Tonight was a watershed moment for Hillary...here's why
The heavyweights of the Democratic Party in my opinion wanted to support her all along but they needed this kind of sign. Tonight was the key.

She has won almost every big population state and only lost Missouri by a very small margin. Tonight showed not only the validity of her campaign but also turned almost certain humiliation into extraordinary jubilation.

Watch the endorsements line up now.

Biden
Richardson

and I believe the Big Kahuna saw what he needed to tonight to get onboard......John (Attorney General) Edwards !!

The train is steaming now
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 01:50 AM
Response to Original message
1. I adore John Edwards
I caucused for Hillary.
I hope he stays out of it though and doesn't endorse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nutmegger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 01:55 AM
Response to Reply #1
12. This Edwards supporter absolutely agrees.
Edited on Wed Mar-05-08 01:56 AM by Nutmegger
Edwards should stay out of the fray.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 01:50 AM
Response to Original message
2. Too bad it's a waterboard moment for the rest of us
:hurts:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 02:02 AM
Response to Reply #2
18. snap!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krkaufman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 02:15 AM
Response to Reply #2
22. if only I could rec your comment. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TeamJordan23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 01:51 AM
Response to Original message
3. Bill Richardon this past weekend: "whoever is ahead in pledged delegates after March 4
Should be the nominee." (paraphrasing)

So don't count on that endorsement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 01:55 AM
Response to Reply #3
11. He backtracked on that statement today.
Edited on Wed Mar-05-08 01:56 AM by in_cog_ni_to
He said if Hillary won RI, OHIO AND Texas she should stay in the race because she would then have a chance to win. She DID win RI, Ohio AND Texas, so she's staying in....just like Richardson said she should.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 01:58 AM
Response to Reply #3
15. Who the fuck is Bill Richardson to tell ANYONE anything?
Doesn't he have a state to run or voting machines to wipe or something?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anamandujano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 02:15 AM
Response to Reply #15
23. What name recognition he has was given to him by Bill Clinton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 02:16 AM
Response to Reply #23
25. I can't stand him. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anamandujano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 04:52 AM
Response to Reply #25
42. Well, he did have a starring role in defusing a critical situation in Korea,
if anyone remembers. He got quite a reputation for pulling out some wins in scary negotiations.

He's not as much of a lightweight as people like to pretend.

I don't really dislike him at all, except when he turns on those who gave him what credentials he has.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FedoraLV Donating Member (226 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 02:44 AM
Response to Reply #23
34. Name Recognition
Erm, isn't this also true of Hillary Clinton?

-FedoraLV
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jlake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 01:51 AM
Response to Original message
4. K&R ~ I think you're spot on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Dunham Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 01:53 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. A very likely scenario.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 01:53 AM
Response to Original message
5. Yep, yep, yep, yep, yep. They will ALL endorse her now.
This was HUGE for Hillary!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 01:53 AM
Response to Original message
6. Washington has a bigger population than Mass
Obama has won more blue states than Hillary. I don't think the leadership likes her quite as much as you think they do, or they'd have already endorsed her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 03:11 AM
Response to Reply #6
36. Yup. Which party bigwigs have endorsed her?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClayZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 01:53 AM
Response to Original message
8. Bwahahahhahaha, you must be kidding!
:rofl:

Barack Obama is ahead, do the math!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 02:01 AM
Response to Reply #8
16. That doesn't matter. If it's CLOSE, the Super Delegates can vote for whomever they choose.
Don't forget about MI and FL. Howard Dean NOW MUST deal with those states.

When she wins PA. things will change in a BIG way. I don't think you will be :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 01:54 AM
Response to Original message
9. The Ohio victory was profound. Obama knows it.
Obama ran up against a stone wall.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blondiegrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 01:55 AM
Response to Original message
10. Not so fast. Richardson said the other day that whoever is leading
the race in overall pledged delegates after Tuesday primaries should be the nominee and the loser (that would be Clinton) should drop out, for the good of the party.

I highly doubt he would turn around and endorse Hillary when he clearly believes she's tearing apart the party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anamandujano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 01:57 AM
Response to Reply #10
14. See post #11.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dansolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 01:56 AM
Response to Original message
13. They are going to stay back
Obama is still in the lead. There is seven weeks until the PA primary. Any momentum from this will dissipate, especially if her delegate gains for the day are minimal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Rinaldo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 02:01 AM
Response to Original message
17. I'm not at all sure they will endorse Hillary now
I kind of doubt it actually. But this stops the pressure on them to endorse Obama, and that is critical for Clinton. Now the race will go on to Pennsylvania at the very least. If Hillary wins big there, THEN I expect those endorsements to start falling for Clinton. She has no problem now waiting that long for those endorsements. PA can deliver them for her in time for that to influence the Super Delegates. It will also force the Democratic Party to find a way to let Florida and Michigan have a say in this contest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justice Is Comin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 02:07 AM
Response to Original message
19. Another thing that this is going to force
something is aboslutely going to have to be done now to find a way to have the votes count in Florida and Michigan.

There is no way those states after tonight will go uncounted.

If they re-vote, it will be a Hillary clobbering. Even worse than the vote totals are now for obama.

The super delegates will then be the icing on the cake.


I'm confident tonight was the beginning of the exit for obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JCMach1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 02:12 AM
Response to Reply #19
21. Excellent point, Obama needs to cut a deal on MI and FL to his advantage now
a revote in June would sink him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 02:19 AM
Response to Reply #19
28. They cannot and should not count Florida and Michigan
There is no way to estimate how many people did NOT vote because it didn't count...or who crossed over to vote republican.
I do NOT have a problem with the delegates being seated...but I truly believe that in the gesture of fair play...they would have to re-do their primary. I obviously CARE about who wins...otherwise I wouldn't vote...but I expect the process to be fair.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JCMach1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 02:31 AM
Response to Reply #28
30. Note, I said deal... If they truly vote it could mean disaster
for Obama... They could cut deal for partial representation, or some such.


If they vote, Obama & Co. have some trouble.



They SHOULD NOT be disenfranchised from the process as some have suggested.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 02:40 AM
Response to Reply #30
33. They should have followed the rules
But the state party should have to pay for that somehow and not the voters.
It's a bad deal all the way around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JCMach1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 04:10 AM
Response to Reply #33
41. fu$% the rules, what about democracy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #19
47. Why should he exit when he could be VP and Unify the party?
There's no way the Party can lose his energy and the new voters he's brought into the process. The party would be split between Obama and Hillary supporters. The Party must go for Experience and Energy... If Hillary wins PA...then a compromise of both of them on the same ticket, is the way to go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Corkey Mineola Donating Member (264 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 02:09 AM
Response to Original message
20. Wise post
Choosing a nominee involves
a. primaries where rank and file voters elect pledged delegates
b. superdelegates act in the best interests of the party.

Hopefully part b will reflect the broader will of the electorate. But we will know a lot more about the feasibility of an Obama or Clinton candidacy by the convention.

The pledged delegate count difference will be small enough to justify action by superdelegates.

I hope the best candidate is selected. I think it could be either although I'm sweet on Hillary for a variety of reasons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justice Is Comin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 02:17 AM
Response to Reply #20
26. Watch the news headlines in the morning papers.
They will be gigantic.

And the bucks will come pouring in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Levgreee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 02:16 AM
Response to Original message
24. Have we forgot Obama's 11 straight wins beforehand? Have those just disappeared?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
casus belli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 02:18 AM
Response to Original message
27. Might want to wait for delegate counts to start with the fantasy politics.
Obama will still be ahead in both popular vote and delegate counts. I'm not sure you're thinking this through if you're convinced that 3 wins out of 12 is all the supers needed to get on board the Hill-train.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 02:28 AM
Response to Original message
29. oh gods yes!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Window Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 02:35 AM
Response to Original message
31. I keep hearing about Hillary winning the big states.
The "big" states that Hillary won almost always vote democratic. Obama would surely carry them in November.

Nothing changed much in delegates tonight, Obama's still very much ahead, and will win more states and delegates.


Spin on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justice Is Comin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 02:55 AM
Response to Reply #31
35. That is correct--you do hear about Hillary winning all the largest
most populated states because she is.

But you would rather have the one who can win the states McCain is going to carry in a landslide. Talk about spin.

Wishin' and hopin'...plannin' and dreamin'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Window Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 03:24 AM
Response to Reply #35
40. As I stated,
The "big" states she won, Obama will easily carry in the GE.


You need to stop "dreaming" and pay attention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 03:14 AM
Response to Reply #31
39. That's a really important point. Calif would easily become Obama Country!
I live in CA, and I know only 1 person who voted for Clinton. That was my hubby, and he could have voted for either one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LulaMay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 02:36 AM
Response to Original message
32. Yes! As Ohio goes, so goes the nation! GO HILLARY!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 03:12 AM
Response to Reply #32
37. Obama will prove that wrong.
It's a new age and old superstitions shall have no power over us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TeamJordan23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 03:12 AM
Response to Reply #32
38. Tell that to JFK. nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Berry Cool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 07:39 AM
Response to Original message
43. Something's steaming, all right. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 08:32 AM
Response to Original message
44. It's a little late to be discovering the "validity" of her campaign.
There's no need to flail about to find meaning in last night. She's a strong candidate and was going to win a lot of delegates. Obama's eleven straight was a statistical fluke, it seems, and not the voice of inevitability. Even if Clinton was unable to turn things around, she was always a "valid" candidate.

Just not quite strong enough to win the nomination. Yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 08:35 AM
Response to Original message
45. Justice is Coming, your name says it all!!
Great post! :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 08:36 AM
Response to Original message
46. Just exactly what did Hillary do last night?
She won in states she was expected to win; just a couple of weeks ago she had 20 point leads in Ohio and Texas. After the dust settles she will have netted ONE delegate.

Obama is the one who trended up over the past couple of weeks, got close but didn't win the popular vote. He still stays on top with delegates.

I fail to see what all the excitement's about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raffi Ella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
48. YES
I think NOW we will start seeing The Party Backing OUR WOMAN!

She did it!WE DID IT!And now The Party better step up and Let the World Know:Hillary has their STRONG SUPPORT.


WOOOOOo GO HILLARY!!!!GO!


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC