We are now seeing why HRC didn't want TX caucus results done quickly

[rainbow4321]

Remember that little blurb in the Ft Worth Star Telegram about the TX Dem Party putting $60,000 up to get voluntary-hurry-up-and-count/hand in-the-caucus stats?? And HRC camp threatened to sue over it, instead they wanted to wait the full 3 days that TX Dem law allows??? Saying that rushed results would be flimsy/half-baked...this is why, folks...as we have said all weekend, the caucus numbers will throw even more delegates into the Obama column and HRC LOSES what would matter most: more TX delagates. Instead of focusing on that, she will try and claim a victory using popular votes tonight...the caucus results get a Friday night dump-----3 full 24 hr news cycles later.

[sandnsea]

1. They'll probably sue too

and keep it in the courts until PA, anything to pretend she's winning. It is pretty pathetic.

[readmoreoften]

4. Just like your guy is suing in Ohio. Oh, right--whatever Obama does is righteous.

When do I get my FUCKING IGNORE LIST BACK!!!!????

[Cant trust em]

2. nothing has been simple in these primaries

Exciting, yet exhausting.

[moobu2]

3. Pretty smart move

[CoffeeCat]

5. That's exactly it...

She needed to declare herself a "winner" tonight. They bought the confetti
and had the "party" planned for a while.

They need as many days as possible, spinning their "win", as they try to dovetail
this, "We're winning!!!" stuff into momentum going into the next contests.

By the time the real numbers comes in--showing that Obama won more delegates
in these contests--the Clinton camp will say, "Texas? What is this Texas of
which you speak? We are winners! We're on a roll!"

In effect, he won't get a bump or added momentum from his delegate wins tonight.

[KittyWampus]

6. yes, I posted a thread on it and Obama supporters stupidly ignored it.

[peoli]

8. its a cryingshame that i missed it

[FlyingSquirrel]

7. Very obvious

However it doesn't matter. The math is the math and this night simply delays the inevitable.

[rainbow4321]

9. Seems like the words "caucus results not in yet" are NOT in MSM's vocab

You can't change the numbers, HRC, as much as you want to...fuzzy math won't be getting you to the WH.

[Beregond2]

10. BO

Not to mention, BO is going to droop a couple of bombs in the next few days that will take all the attention away from her.

[FlyingSquirrel]

12. Hey wait, his finger's not on the button YET!

:rofl:

[silverweb]

11. Yeah, I'm looking at the caucus numbers.

If the discrepancy between the votes and the caucuses continues to be so large, does it mean that the freepers who heeded Limpballs' call for reTHUGs to vote for Hillary voted, but were just too damned lazy to go caucus as well... and the caucuses show where the REAL Dem vote is?

Just askin'.... :shrug: