People getting excited about Hillary in Texas should look at the county map

[hey560]

Dallas - 13% reporting, Obama +40k
Project +350k

Austin - 9% reporting, Obama +30k
Project +300k

Houston - 1%, Obama +30k
Project +3Mil (sounds too big, CNN probably has 1% reporting wrong). Lets just say +500k

With most of the rural counties fully reporting.

Obama, should see a net gain of 1.2Million votes by the time its over.

He will win by 7 to 10% easy.

Reference:
http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/primaries/results/state/#TX

[Kaylee]

1. That's what I'm noticing....

How does El Paso's 0% reporting at this time affect the picture?

Edit: Presido and Val Verde also have 0% in "Hillary Country". Will they generate a lot of votes her way.

[debbierlus]

12. It is too close to call

[Kurt_and_Hunter]

2. I agree... I am expecting TX to go Obama (just getting on the record)

[nadinbrzezinski]

3. That is razor thin

[Kaylee]

5. As long as it's a win for Obama.

[Kittycat]

4. And we STILL are waiting on Caucus Results.

I just don't get why we go through this every time? Early results come in for smaller areas, and favor HRC. Metro areas come in late - favor Obama. Obama's supporters are also more dedicated and come out to caucus for him.

*sigh*

[hey560]

6. Exactly. He should win Texas easy.

[judaspriestess]

7. OH HELL YEAH

San Antonio going to Clinton, mmmmmwwwwaaaahhhhhh
I knew they wouldn't let me down!!

[InAbLuEsTaTe]

8. Won't even be close. Add 50+ SDs - this baby is over. GObama!

[Renew Deal]

9. Those vote totals include early voters

So it's skewed.

Also, El Paso is big for Hillary.

[mohc]

10. Even with it tied

He is winning 65-51 in delegates.

[I Vote In Pittsburgh]

11. Yup

Most won't bother checking the map though. About 70% of the rural counties are fully reporting. We barely have 10% of the urban vote.

[hey560]

13. Same deal with Ohio. Her Lead in Ohio will close < 10%. She will lose ground today