How many voices need to speak up before the voters start to listen?
I remember Wes Clark saying the same thing, based on "Pentagon sources"--it was in his book, before the campaign began. Could well have been Lt General Kerrick--they are quite close, and he matches the description given in the old Rolling Stone article.
Then, just yesterday, I read this article from a guy who used to work for Clarke and has since retired to MN:
Tom Maertens: Clarke's public service
Tom Maertens
March 28, 2004MAERTENS0328
<snip>
Clarke was a colleague of mine for 15 months in the White House, under both Bill Clinton and George W. Bush. Subsequently, I moved to the U.S. State Department as deputy coordinator for counterterrorism, and worked with him and his staff before and after 9/11.
My experience confirms what Clarke relates in his book. The Bush administration did ignore the threat of terrorism. It was focused on tax cuts, building a ballistic missile system, withdrawing from the ABM Treaty and rejecting the Kyoto Protocol.
Administration officials seemed to believe that the terrorist attacks on the United States in East Africa, and on the USS Cole, were due to Clinton's moral failings. Since they didn't share those weaknesses, and because President Bush had the blessing of Jerry Falwell, Pat Robertson and Justice Antonin Scalia, we would be spared any serious attack. Moral superiority would triumph.
I personally believe that Clarke was one of the most effective government officials I have ever worked with -- most effective, but not the most loved. He has been described as a bureaucratic steamroller, and he no doubt ruffled some feathers, but who better to put in charge of counterterrorism? Unfortunately, he suffered the fate of Cassandra: He was able to foresee the future but not convince his leaders of the threat. More (worth reading) at:
http://www.startribune.com/stories/562/4690189.html