Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

It's time to wake people up to Obama's tainted past

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Cronus Protagonist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 12:19 PM
Original message
It's time to wake people up to Obama's tainted past
Tainted. According to Obama, Resko supported Obama and lots of other politicians but, according to Obama, the only one who wasn't on the take was Obama. Let's take a look at what we know about this.

Obama's wife's hugely escalating paychecks were merited, not payola, no sir.

The very beneficial real estate deal involving this influence peddler, the beneficiary of which was Obama, and the deal was admitted by Obama. The law may have something different to call that move given how much cash Obama made out of it from a corrupt political influence peddler. And all that cash, that wasn't Obama on the take, it was just a "boneheaded move". Many people have gone to jail for boneheaded moves, and one must ask if we want to nominate a candidate who may be called to trial as a witness (perhaps later as a defendant)? Do we really?

Really?

Can we win with our candidate in a courthouse as a witness and under suspicion of being on the take from a man on trial for poltiical corruption?

Really?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. Against a man who literally sleeps with lobbyists? Of course we can.
Hillary can win too, btw.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bowens43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
2. give it a rest, your swiftboating isn't helping your candidate. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cronus Protagonist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #2
14. My candidate was Dennis, and this ain't swiftboating
I know you'd like it to be, but I stuck to the facts and asked questions you ignored. Par for the course for an Obama supporter.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
superkia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #14
32. I think Kucinich was the peoples candidate and had to be...
shutdown but I can also see that the clear choice is Obama, over Clinton and McCain. At this point we need to pick the best possible candidate for our children and its not Clinton or McCain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cronus Protagonist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #32
35. Actually, we need to pick the best candidate who can win
Not just "for the children", because a losing candidate will be absolutely disastrous for our children and our children's children. IMHO either candidate we have will be a great president, but they MUST win the general in order for that to happen.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hoof Hearted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #35
39. Bingo!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #35
40. so you're totally ignorant of the many RECENT filthy money scandals involving the Clintons?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cronus Protagonist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #40
41. List the current trials that Hillary Clinton is involved in for me then
Oh, wait, there are none. And there is an Obama one, no one disputes that.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #41
47. #1. Obama isn't involved in the Rezko trial. #2. Gupta was sued by shareholders
for giving millions to Bill Clinton for doing nothing

#3. Clintons refuse to release their tax return, where did their 50+ million in income originate? They loaned at least 5 million to their campaign.

And the fact you think Obama is involved in the Rezko trial says everything about you and your bogus concern.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cronus Protagonist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #47
50. Bill Clinton? Bill? The prospective first husband?
And you had to go way back for that one. Also, if Obama's not involved in the Rezko trial, ask yourself why the news is 24/7 about his involvement with Rezko and the likelihood that he will have to testify? That's involvement, pal, and it's current, and it could scupper the presidency for Democratics all over the country. But you don't care about winning the general election. That's obvious.

However, luckily for all of us, others do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
superkia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #35
49. I agree totally and the way that Obama has inspired people to...
vote shows us clearly that he can win. I think Clintons tactics are hurting his chances but if the election isn't stolen, I still believe that Americans are waking up to the typical dirty tricks in politics and are going to do the right thing this time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
C_U_L8R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
3. oh the breathless conjecture of it all !!!
silly season is here again
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
4. Clearly you're very informed.
And you've been reading a lot about the Resko situation.

:spray:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JKaiser Donating Member (569 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
5. I am worried Obama will be in trouble in GE. I don't want another republican prez
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. Then you're worried about nothing.
Obama versus McStrangelove? Anti-war candidate versus "bomb bomb bomb Iran"? On and on like that... The only thing to worry about in the general election is how much we're going to win by.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cronus Protagonist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #5
15. I hope more people take that into consideration today
IF we don't look at the general, we are not going to pick the best candidate. I'm still wishing we had more choice, but there it is, and there they are. Hillary not under suspicion, Obama tainted. Choose.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaJones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
6. huge news breaking in 24 business hours. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabatha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #6
22. You have a source for that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
THUNDER HANDS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
7. comparing the taint of Obama to the taint on McCain or Clinton is like comparing
a snowflake to a blizzard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cronus Protagonist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #7
16. McCain and Clinton have received financial benefits from an influence peddler?
Show me.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #16
34. #1 recipient of largesse from the drug companies, the insurance companies
and defense companies. But no, they aren't really interested in "influencing" anything. And that money in Hillary's pocket is Monopoly money.

jeebus
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cronus Protagonist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #34
36. Are they on trial? Didn't think so.
There IS a difference between legal and illegal acts, no matter how much you feel they are congruent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #34
53. That was not the premise of your comment. You can move the goalposts
as much as you care to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #7
18. dirty dirty
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DearAbby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
8. :::checking to see if I am on FreeRepublic:::: n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Levgreee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
9. Very beneficial? He got the house for 300k under asking price, which is common in some real estate
markets. He didn't get a lesser price because of Rezko, whatsoever. Rezko just bought the plot next to the house, as both needed to be bought at the same time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cronus Protagonist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #9
19. No, Resko's wife "bought" it on her $30 grand salary
And they left it vacant, subdividing it so a house cannot be built there, greatly benefitting Obama. This is not disputed. Obama visited the property with Resko. This is not disputed.

If this were Hillary even if she were just having a personal friendship with such a character, the airwaves would be jumping with scandal. It is time that people got to know Obama a little better.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabatha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #9
23. That is not true.
The couple who sold Barack Obama his Chicago home said the Illinois senator's $1.65 million bid ``was the best offer'' and they didn't cut their asking price because a campaign donor bought their adjacent land, according to e-mails between Obama's presidential campaign and the seller.

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&sid=a_9sOMpy91Js&refer=us
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catchawave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #9
26. In a tony Chicago neighborhoods ?
There are no 300k bargains, just creative financing. Hmmmm.

I wish this would have been vetted months ago, it's going to kill us in Nov :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Benhurst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
10. Shh! You're giving Karl Rove talking points.
I'm sure he hasn't thought of this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cronus Protagonist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #10
24. Yeah, sure, like he needs the help of an obscure poster on a web site
I'm sure he's reading thousands of blogs a day to glean wisdom from us all.

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Benhurst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #24
30. I see you use the sarcasm Smilie.
There do seem to be many on DU who need one to recognize it.

Perhaps I should start.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cronus Protagonist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #30
33. I think it's best
People on here take things WAY too seriously, especially during an election. As if a few musings on here matter more than a whit in the grand scheme of things. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
11. You do know that this has all been investigated and debunked, right?
Oh wait, you were just trying to smear Obama. Nevermind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
13. We made itt through "I did not have sex with that women" didn't we?
So we can walk through anything ~~ :bounce:

We were 100% with them when Bill "told the truth" about "that woman."

In fact, if it had not been for all the loyal Democrats that stood right beside him the entire time, including ALL of the African Americans in Congress -- she would not be a candidate today.

How sexist can you be to call a young lady friend that had been intimately in your presence "that woman?!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. Rezko
I have been largly silent on this Issue but how In the hell can you compare this to the various Clinton scandals.Those her supporters have collected amnesia.Obama has not and I repeat not been accused of any wrong doings.The most that can be said Is Rezko who gave money to Obama helped him
buy his house.Obama Isn't like the Clintons and Mccain having tons of money(he could never afford to loan his campaign 5 million)Obama may not be perfect but I would take him over the Clintons and Mccain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PassingFair Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. What about Ratzo Rizzo?
Even the NAME is perfect for a smear campaign.

Anybody buying into the slime is
a political coward right now.

Too little, too late, I hope, for Clinton....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnsnake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
21. Republicans were hoping they could save all this for the General Election
They're just keeping their fingers crossed that Obama doesn't blow this thing now because they foresee their only chance of maintaining control of the WH if Obama's the nominee.

You can be assured that the Right Wing dirt machine has so much stuff up their sleeve on him that they can't wait for him to beat Hillary so they can get to work with their slime and grime tactics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabatha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #21
25. Any evidence of that?
Don't you think the Clintons would have brought out all the dirt they could?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnsnake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #25
28. No evidence. It's just human nature they'd want to save that ammo for themselves when it matters
most to them. Just my opinion based on watching how they always operate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soleft Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #21
48. Which is may be why it's good the convention is late August
If the Resko thing does blow up we've got Edwards and Gore in the wings, and Clinton if she only suspends.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cronus Protagonist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 05:38 PM
Response to Reply #48
60. That is the truly awesome thing about this process
Edited on Tue Mar-04-08 05:38 PM by Cronus Protagonist
And it's also why Hillary should not bow out early. I'm thinking in a brokered convention, Edwards may still get the nod, and if all the candidates are essentially broken by then, Mr. Albert Gore, nobel prize winner can step in and save us all, which is a long shot, but I think Albert would step up to the plate if his country called for him.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
27. You seem to be saying Obama is just as bad as Hillary.
If association was guilt, the Clintons would have gone to prison with the likes of Webb Hubbell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cronus Protagonist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #27
37. Not talking about association, but about cash money tranfers
And a trial for illegal influence peddling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
29. OMG -- Kerry, GOre, Rush, Boxer, Jackson, and Mosely-Braun all on the take!!
Pulitzer prize winning stuff. All of these folks got contributions from Rezko, so they too must have "been on the take".

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cronus Protagonist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #29
44. Contributons do not equal influence peddling to the tune of hundreds of thousands of $$
But of course, you know that, so why be so disingenious? If a convicted felon sends money to a candidate that is not influence peddling. Making hundreds of thousands on a real estate deal is quite another matter.

Personally, I don't care about Obama, which is why my eyes are wide open. I just want us to win, not back a horse that's going to collapse before the finish line.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #44
55. I'm sorry, but what's disingenuous is to suggest that because Obama received Rezko
Edited on Tue Mar-04-08 05:25 PM by onenote
contributions he must be on the take because everyone else who got contributions from Rezko was on the take. WHich is what the OP suggests, like it or not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cronus Protagonist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #55
56. Do the math
Do you really believe that Obama's financial gains (admitted by Obama and framed as "boneheaded") were NOT connected to Rezko's influence peddling? Obama is a saint and all the other recipients of Rezko's money are the bad ones? I think you have to admit that there is doubt at the very least there, and you also have to admit that if this story were about Hillary getting big bucks from Rezko, she'd be pilloried. Why the double standard?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cottonseed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
31. This is old news.
If there was any "there" there, this would have came out well before Obama had beaten the tar out of Hillary in the last 11 contests. Hell, should have been "time" to air this before the campaign even started, considering there hasn't been a day when Hillary has won more delegates that Obama. It's a waste of time floating this debunked garbage and it wreaks of desparation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
38. *bom bom* tainted past, whoa-whoa-whoa, tainted past...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DefenseLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #38
42. Some times I feel... I've got to.. *bom bom* run away
I've got to *bom bom* get away from... posts like these.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
43. I'm not going anywhere near your taint
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cronus Protagonist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #43
45. I don't have a taint, thanks. Obama does n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 03:14 PM
Response to Original message
46. How's the negative campaigning going?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cronus Protagonist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #46
52. Not too badly, but not as well as Obama's negative campaign is going.
But I do think we have a watershed moment coming up. The question is do we want to win the general?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
51. and the influence peddling????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CyberPieHole Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
54. The Rezko/Obama connection is not the only thing in Obama's past...
I can hardly wait to find out what other skeletons are in his closet.:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cronus Protagonist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #54
57. I just hope that, if he still gets the nod, that there are no others
I want to win in November no matter which candidate, but as of now there is still a chance to vet them, and I say it's time for Obama's past to be vetted now before too many people are swayed by his speechifying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 05:36 PM
Original message
watering down Illinois law against nuclear waste dumping to please Exelon
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 05:36 PM
Response to Original message
58. watering down Illinois law against nuclear waste dumping to please Exelon
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 05:36 PM
Response to Original message
59. watering down Illinois law against nuclear waste dumping to please Exelon
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
totodeinhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 05:47 PM
Response to Original message
61. This type of talk can only help the GOP in November
And our main goal should be that Dems win in November. Arguing over dirt like this is counter productive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seabiscuit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
62. Better to take Obama down now then let McCain do it during the general election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
totodeinhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #62
63. This type of thing hurts both of our candidates and only helps McCain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 01:44 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC