Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

You mean the same Rachel Maddow who said in January that Chris Matthews is the best analyst on TV?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
QuicklyLoving Donating Member (15 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 12:08 AM
Original message
You mean the same Rachel Maddow who said in January that Chris Matthews is the best analyst on TV?
The Goddess has spoken! some are yelling, because Rachel Maddow did what she's supposed to do being a member of MSNBC: bash Hillary.

And what about her nice words toward sexist dim-wit Chris Matthews?

Maddow, 1-12-2008:
(Maddow) said Matthews is the best political analyst on television for his knowledge, quickness and ability to be critical while anchoring a broadcast.


http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2008/01/12/chris_matthews_a_target_for_clinton_fans_critical_of_media/

Then again, you don't become a mainstream reporter without ignoring what your fellow pundits do to our public discourse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 12:12 AM
Response to Original message
1. they were quite weird tonight
Tweety looked quite ill. And Rachel, while smart as a tack, seemed off base on a few things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bridgit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 12:13 AM
Response to Original message
2. Welcome to DU, QuicklyLoving...
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mucifer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 12:16 AM
Response to Original message
3. Rachel has commented that Obama uses sexist tactics.
It was an antiObama statement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orangepeel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 12:20 AM
Response to Original message
4. I love Rachel Maddow
:loveya:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 12:22 AM
Response to Original message
5. You show at DU bashing Rachel Maddow
That's telling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kittycat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 12:23 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Sockpuppets in full force.
It's spamalot night.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WorseBeforeBetter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 12:49 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. Shall we place a bet as to how long this one lasts?
My fave three were booted...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kittycat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 10:08 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. Already resting in the graveyard
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WorseBeforeBetter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Ha! That's what I get for sleeping... I missed it! (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DearAbby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #5
13. I agree - Unfeckingbelievable
Rachal Maddow? :shurg: Who's next?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalnurse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 12:48 AM
Response to Original message
7. Maddow, Schultz, Miller....
they all have some exchange deal going on.....whores, each and everyone...We are just meat for them to share....No longer insightful...just another tv show now.

Entertainment 101.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spag68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 12:51 AM
Response to Original message
9. I'm sure
if she said that, she had her tongue firmly planted in her cheek, and fingers crossed behind her back. Got to grease the idiot tweety a little if you hope to get face time. She is spot on most of the time, but remember she and all the others on the TV are by nature entertainers looking for work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chitty Donating Member (918 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 12:12 PM
Response to Original message
12. So now
we're throwing Rachel under the bus?

Gimme a break.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DearAbby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Unfeckingbelievable isn't it? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftCoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. She's not a bad person, but she's hardly unbiased
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
15. Rachel rules.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
17. So when Maddow compliments Matthews it's bad...
When Clinton does it to McCain...

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chitty Donating Member (918 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Don't even
go there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 05:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC