Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama is winning because hes Negative,but then smiles nice

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
MojoMojoMojo Donating Member (579 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 06:36 PM
Original message
Obama is winning because hes Negative,but then smiles nice
"I dont take Lobby or Pac"(lie by the way)
actually means, That bitch is owned by big business
When in fact Obama takes as much corporate money as Hillary

"I was against the war",
means
Hillary caused the war and is disqualified
When IMO he may have also voted for the IWR.
He hedges and says he didnt have the same intelligence info that Congress had.
But will not rule out re-invading Iraq,bombing Iran,Bombing Pakistan,Leaving mercenary troops in Iraq after a redeployment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
JimGinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 06:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yeah,



















:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 06:40 PM
Response to Original message
2. "That bitch?" Wonder how many Clinton defenders will "reject and denounce"...
...your sexist language?

NGU.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. From previous threads, I'm going to guess NONE
"Bitch" is only sexist if it's used against Hillary. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #7
15. I saw that. Of course, my theory is that Clinton defenders are sexist...
...because Obama has two brilliant women named Power and Rice as senior foreign policy advisors, and all Clinton has is a couple of male chumps named Penn and Wolfson.

NGU.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 06:41 PM
Response to Original message
3. He mentions his accomplishments, doesn't mention his opponents.
Hillary forgets to talk about herself because she's to busy mocking and insulting her opponent and their supporters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheDonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
4. lol, wow
:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nonconformist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 06:45 PM
Response to Original message
5. Obama is textbook passive-aggressive. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theboss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
6. Hey...it worked for Kennedy, Reagan, Clinton, and W
The fist in the velvet glove approach has always been the most effective political technique.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
graywarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 06:48 PM
Response to Original message
8. Like. . .
:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
matcom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 06:48 PM
Response to Original message
9. yet another 12 year old posting on Mom's computer
when *I* was your age young man I was looking at PORN!

I suggest you run off and do the same (after your Mac 'n Cheese for dinner)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 06:48 PM
Response to Original message
10. can we get 5 recs??
:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 06:48 PM
Response to Original message
11. So THAT'S why he's winning. Thanks for clearing that up!
:hi:
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 06:49 PM
Response to Original message
12. Obama is winning because he knows how to use punctuation
Pay attention in English class, or you'll never be president!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mythyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 06:50 PM
Original message
oh yeah, Hillary NEVER plays negative and then smiles nice
:eyes:

reeking with hypocrisy there...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
13. So in order not to be negative, his positions
and donations would need to be the same as Hillary's. Meanwhile, the Clinton campaign's phone ad wasn't negative nor the Farrakhan flap. Oakie doakie, I'm clear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 06:51 PM
Response to Original message
14. OH MY!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 06:52 PM
Response to Original message
16. yikes, this OP is particularly lame and whiny
and that's saying something. Oh, welcome to DU. Enjoy your brief stay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Window Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
17. Huh!!
:wtf:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 02:13 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC