Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

It's as simple as 1,627

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Khaotic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 04:36 PM
Original message
It's as simple as 1,627
1,627 is fifty percent plus one of the 3,253 democratically selected delegates to the Democratic nominating convention.

Once a candidate has 1,627 of these "pledged" delegates, he or she will win the nomination -- unless the judgment of voters is overturned by the 796 superdelegates. That's why 1,627 is the real magic number. With 1,627 delegates, a candidate is guaranteed a democratic majority, and the only way his or her opponent can win is by subverting democracy.

This presents a big challenge for Hillary Clinton. We're already seventy percent through the primary and caucus calendar, and she would have to win at least 58% of the remaining delegates to hit 1,627. Meanwhile, even though Barack Obama only needs to win 44%, he's winning contest after contest with huge 60+% majorities.

HONESTLY ... how many people believe Hillary will reach 1,627 before Obama????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Window Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 04:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. I don't think Hillary will reach 1,627 before Obama, but the following paragraph
is cause for concern:

Once a candidate has 1,627 of these "pledged" delegates, he or she will win the nomination -- unless the judgment of voters is overturned by the 796 superdelegates. That's why 1,627 is the real magic number. With 1,627 delegates, a candidate is guaranteed a democratic majority, and the only way his or her opponent can win is by subverting democracy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MagsDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 04:55 PM
Response to Original message
2. Is that why Obama people are harassing and intimidating the supers?
I know they think the rules should be changed for him and that the supers should just vote for Obama because you say so, but that isn't how it works.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Harassing and intimidating?
You mean redressing their government over grievances?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 08:54 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC