Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Do you think that Hillary knows she's trailing because she has alienated progressives?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 08:16 PM
Original message
Do you think that Hillary knows she's trailing because she has alienated progressives?
Her support for the invasion and occupation of Iraq, the "war" on "terror," the invasion of citizen privacy and abrogation of civil liberties and the her support for a corporation-friendly agenda have cost her dearly with an energized Democratic electorate, IMHO.


If she does know this, do you think it will change her own positions in the future?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TheDonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 08:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. Do your mean her "tough talk" and "centrist" positioning for 6 years cost her from gliding into the
White House?

Oh dear... what a miscalculation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sueragingroz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 08:19 PM
Response to Original message
2. she hasn't alienated this progressive... /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 09:08 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. assume for the moment that Obama wins the nomination
What effect, if any, do you think it will have on Clinton's agenda?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 08:20 PM
Response to Original message
3. I think Obama's being a sharp alternative to petulant politicains...
....is so very refreshing. We wound up having a wide choice among those on our own side of the aisle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 08:21 PM
Response to Original message
4. That wouldn't explain so many people who can't be categorized. I
think it's easier than that; people like and perhaps trust Obama more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. the "evil" you don't know is better than the "evil" you do?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 10:32 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. You asked:
Obama gets me in the gut. I have read "a lot" about him, and I just have faith that he'll attempt to do the right thing w/o the DLC being involved, without cowtowing to corporate interests. Sure, he has a daunting task, and sure, he'll piss me off about some decisions, but I just trust him so much more.

End of story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 04:18 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. good to hear.
I have several friends who've said the same thing. I certainly have been moved by some of his speeches. On some important (although not the *most* important to me) issues, he has very intriguing and admirable positions.

But, I guess I've been burned too many times . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 08:23 PM
Response to Original message
5. She needs to REMEMBER..."Neo-Gore" that she and Bill didn't Support!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeatleBoot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 08:25 PM
Response to Original message
6. Not in Ohio
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HysteryDiagnosis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 08:26 PM
Response to Original message
7. Who can more righteously go after shrub and company for their
actions against the American people, democracy and the constitution?? A person who gave the green light to shrub for an illegal/immoral war halfway around the world that has done UNTOLD damage to America or a person who wanted nothing to do with it??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
latebloomer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 08:26 PM
Response to Original message
8. She deeply regrets that she voted for the IWR
because she never dreamed the war would be so unpopular by the time she started running for President!

Yes, I've always said that she has a snowball's chance of winning the election because the right reviles her and she has totally alienated the left.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 09:45 PM
Response to Original message
11. she never cared about the "progressives"
so why would she even care if they voted? she`ll never change her position in regards to progressives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 09:46 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. who did (does) she care about?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demo dutch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 09:48 PM
Response to Original message
13. Trailing because she 's been hammered by the press, which was pretty evident in last night's debate!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. based purely on my own anecdotal experience,
those I know who label themselves "progressive" mostly support Obama; those who label themselves "moderate" favor Clinton.


The progressives unanimously view Clinton as a corporatist "free-trade" advocate and worse, as pro-invasion and occupation of Iraq. (They are strangely blind to Obama's corporatist record and lack of a voting record in opposition to the neocon invasion of Iraq.)

I think if Clinton had any truly progressive credentials--outspoken anti-war record or a strong pro-worker, anti-corporate record--she'd have wrapped the nomination up by now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 09:59 PM
Response to Original message
14. Does hilary know her hiring of
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johnny__Motown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 05:01 AM
Response to Original message
18. I thought it was because her campaign wasted all their money thinking it would be over on 2/5
and didn't invest in any of the races past 2/5



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 05:06 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. but why *wasn't* it wrapped up by 2/5
if she had appeal even a little to progressives (who better represent the majority of the Democratic constituency AND the new voters than do the mythical "center" voters the DLC paleo-campaign experts think will win for them), Obama never would have gotten his act out of New Hampshire.

Instead, she appears to everyone to be just the same old DLC conservative corporatist accomplice to king george's crimes.


She has run an epically awful campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
casus belli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 05:09 AM
Response to Original message
20. Do you honestly believe that's why she's trailing? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 09:42 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC