Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Howard Dean on MSNBC: The primary will not go until Denver

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 03:08 PM
Original message
Howard Dean on MSNBC: The primary will not go until Denver
Edited on Tue Feb-26-08 03:24 PM by FLDem5
First on McCain and the FEC:
"he doesn't think the reform applies to him."

"he needs to follow the law, it cost us a lot of money to get our candidates on the ticket in many states."

"he has violated the law, it is sophistry to say they never used matching funds."

"this is a question about John McCain's integrity"


Dropping a bomb on the Primary being over soon:

"superdelegates are already shifting, someone will get to 2025 soon."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. He was great; a youtube on that is forthcoming soon, I hope. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. He brought out a letter from the FEC on his own campaign run
that proved his stuff was legal and McCain's wasn't when the Moderator
said that you were doing the same thing that McCain just did



He was great don't miss it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 03:14 PM
Response to Original message
2. Dean just dropped a bombshell! He believes the primary will be over before Denver
he said that superdelegates were already shifting, and along with pledged delegates, one candidate would reach the 2025 soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ericgtr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. That's worthy of a new topic IMO
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. I'm fresh out - please go ahead and make one
I was so thrown, I had trouble typing it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ericgtr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Okay, what's the source exactly?
Just heard it on tv, right? Please give as much info as you have and I will get it posted up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. MSNBC - I just edited the OP, there was still time - let me know if
that sums it up ok.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ericgtr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. Excellent, I saw that
thanks.

K&R :kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K Gardner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #2
20. I was watching him and I missed that b/o the phone ! Damn.. thanks for catching it !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mooney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 03:15 PM
Response to Original message
3. Brilliant
Howard Dean is afraid of nobody.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJSecularist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 03:16 PM
Response to Original message
5. Thank goodness Howard Dean is the DNC chairman
Instead of gutless McAuliffe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
last1standing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. Guess who'll be the DNC chair if Clinton gets the nod?
If it's not McAuliffe it'll be someone just like him. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #5
17. I am sorry I supported him. He is partisan and had handled FL and MI badly.
He has not allowed the Democratic process to go forward and had interfered.He isn't better than MacAuliffe and that is disappointing. Sorry.He has prsued his own personal agenda instead of being neutral.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackORoses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #17
29. now that you have taken the Hillarite oath, you are anti-Dean as well?
what a shame...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. I do not like what Howard has done regarding the primaries. I supported him and the 50 state
strategy.I still support that. I have taken no "oath" to anyone. I support Hillary because she represent me more than Obama who doesn't represent me at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. He followed the rules about primaries...all the way.
It is only Hillary's supporters who are blaming him and not the two states.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #32
36. I agree but he didn't handle it well. He unfortunately gets to take the blame as Chair
because it was his job to somehow control the states and prevent them from going off the rails. Like it or not, that was his job and he couldn't pull it off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #36
41. It is the Hilllary people who are the only ones angry.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 07:08 PM
Response to Reply #41
54. I am actualluy an Edwards supporter. And I am not happy. And I wasn't happy before JRE suspended
Edited on Tue Feb-26-08 07:08 PM by saracat
and I am not happy with Howards intervention in that issue either but heck we don't have to agree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackORoses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #31
44. Howard didn't cause the FL/MI fiasco, the elected officials of those states did
I'm curious, how is it exactly that Hillary represents you more?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Independent-Voter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #17
33. You want to bitch about the FL and MI elected representatives, as they are the ones responsible
of course, that reality thing might be a little much for you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemVet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #33
49. A little much?
Yeah, I'd say disenfranchised voters is "a little much." Remember, it's the people that are being punished, not the state party bigwigs who made the decision.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #17
37. I agree with you. He screwed up on Michigan and Florida
Both of which are swing states and both of which will be desperately needed in the GE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Big Blue Marble Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #37
38. The states screwed up themselves.
They had the choice to follow or break the rules. They did what they did.
In the end, it will not make any difference. They will be seated by Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #37
42. Both states wanted to be big shots.
And they lost.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smiley_glad_hands Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #17
53. Yawn. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #5
35. You can say that again!
Give 'em hell, Doc!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
last1standing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 03:18 PM
Response to Original message
8. Can you imagine how different things would be if he were president right now?
He's followed through on everything he's had the power to do and it's always been in the interests of both the party and the people. I hope we have the chance to fix our mistake someday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. I love him. He makes tough, no nonsense decisions and sticks by them
no matter who hollers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
last1standing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. And the whole Clinton machine comes after him every time he does.
I was willing to let that slide for quite some time, but not now. I'll never support anyone from the Clinton machine in a primary. We need Democrats, not Clintonistas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UALRBSofL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
14. The thing is he is wrong. Obama can't get the 2025 delegates before convention
even with the superdelegates. So why he made that statement without counting the delegates is false information and misleading the general public.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
9119495 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. Regular delgates can switch in many states as they approach
county, state, and district level conventions. I don't know if that is what he was refering to but it is possible that is what he was referring to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. maybe if something big happens, all the supers will switch
Edited on Tue Feb-26-08 03:29 PM by FLDem5
to get this over with?? I don't know, from RCP:

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/democratic_delegate_count.html

Delegate Count
Delegates Obama Clinton
Total - 1375 1279

Super- 795 182 241

Pledged Delegates - 2272 1193 1038

Right now they have Obama needing 650 to secure the nomination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UALRBSofL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #18
22. That's the thing if your numbers are correct
I don't see him getting 650 delegates before the convention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. if they split OH and TX, and splitting RI and VT along the polls,
he gets about 184.

So then he needs 466. There are 372 unpledged Superdelegates.

It could happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stahbrett Donating Member (855 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #22
27. McCain doesn't technically have enough delegates, but he's still the de facto nominee
Obama will be the de facto nominee as well, as soon as Hillary drops out (or suspends her campaign, which seems to be the cool thing to do these days).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Big Blue Marble Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #22
40. Just watch!
It will happen. It is happening behind the scene right now. I think Dean knows more than you do.
We will go to Denver as a unified party and it will be beautiful to behold.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rox63 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #18
48. And some super delegates have already jumped ship from Clinton to Obama
So it is doable for Obama to get all the needed delegates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bicentennial_baby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #14
21. Pledged delegates can switch too!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mohc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #14
23. How's that?
Obama has around a 150 delegate lead in pledged delegates, and is quickly closing the gap in superdelegates. Aside from the 26 delegates Edwards won, all the other delegates are going to Clinton or Obama. Unless you think Obama will end up leading Clinton by less than 26 delegates, a number he already exceeds, he will have over 2025 delegates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mohc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #23
34. To be specific
Using numbers from The Green Papers

Total Delegates
Available 1471
Obama 1303.5
Clinton 1247.5

Obama needs another 721.5 delegates to win the nomination before the convention, out of the remaining 1471. That is just a little less than half the outstanding delegates. He has won over 60% of the pledged delegates since SuperTuesday, and most likely that number will only go higher as his nomination seems more inevitable. And on the superdelegate side things could be more lopsided. Obama is not just winning outstanding delegates, but converting Clinton superdelegates to his side. He should easily be able to win over 650 of the remaining 1088 pledged delegates, putting him very close to the nomination without a single new superdelegate. But at that point the superdelegates would almost certainly fall in line behind him, and all but the most hardened Clinton superdelegates will switch to his side. Unless something unexpected happens he should end up with around 2500 or so delegates by the time Puerto Rico finishes the final contest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #14
24. Obama certainly can.
Obama has now 1360+/- total delegates.

1,088 Pledged Delegates remain, and 400+/- SuperD's have yet to announce.

He needs only 665 of the remaining 1488 left.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemVet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #24
51. No...
...only Hillary can end it before the convention. These polls and tallies of how many super delegates are going to vote which way are meaningless until actual votes are cast...at the convention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemVet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #14
50. True...
a formal decision can't be made until the delegates cast their votes...at the convention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #14
52. Hillary's going to drop out.
So Obama's going to get all the delegates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tatiana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 03:29 PM
Response to Original message
19. Thanks so much for that recap! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UALRBSofL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #19
26. How many times have you seen pledged delegates switch candidates
Especially considering they were seated based on the voters in there districts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tatiana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. Not a lot. But I've done it myself before, so I know it's possible. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
30. Great to hear from the
Chairman Dean, himself, on this Super Delegate biz.. Thanks, FlaDem!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrattotheend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 04:05 PM
Response to Original message
39. Well, I think we know how he's going to vote on March 4
Assuming he still votes in Vermont. Not that it was ever really a secret.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scurrilous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 04:11 PM
Response to Original message
43. K & R
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BringBigDogBack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 04:12 PM
Response to Original message
45. That's been obvious for a while...
Dean and the Dem party won't allow it to go to the convention, because they understand the consequences of that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 04:45 PM
Response to Original message
46. :::::: VIDEO UP!! :::::::::
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21134540/vp/23356110#23356110

I watched the last part again - and what I missed in my excitement was that he said

"the odds are much better than 50/50 that this would not go to the convention."

Its too late to edit the OP to reflect that.

I'm very sorry for the tabloid headline I made out of that.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crispini Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #46
47. Thanks for the link!
I :loveya: Howard! :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NastyRiffraff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
55. I love Dean!
I love watching him speak. BTW, there was no "bomb" about the primary; Dean said what he always has said: let the voters speak. He beat back Nora every time she tried to get him to commit to "how many delegates will it take before you step in." He's ALWAYS said he didn't want this to go to Denver, and that the candidate should be decided by March or April. That hasn't changed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 04:31 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC