Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Dodd Talking To Clinton; "it wasn't a fun conversation to have"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
SoFlaJet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 12:52 PM
Original message
Dodd Talking To Clinton; "it wasn't a fun conversation to have"
when he called her this morning to tell her he was endorsing Barack Obama-(according to Lee Cowan on MSNBC)...I wonder if this sets her off into screaming banshee Hillary in the debate tonight. Is it any wonder why most of the people who work with her either in the senate or in the Clinton administration have no problem defecting?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
gasperc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
1. oh Lord, not good
Townsend gave her great advice, go out on a high note. I guess anyone would flip out after blowing a 40 point lead and $100+million dollars.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmg257 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. "high note", "shrill note", what's the diff?
Edited on Tue Feb-26-08 12:58 PM by jmg257
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fluffdaddy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. Disagree. Hillary fight until you can't possibly win.
Never surrender Never give up............. :evilgrin:

Make Obama work for the nomination. Because the GOP and Wing-nut Radio are going to fight dirty
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #10
20. Yeah, hilary's positioned
herself like a goperative..fightin' down lowndirty but poor hilary is gettin' boomeranged.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Big Blue Marble Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #10
29. Do you realize how much money would be wasted in your senario?
Money that would be better spent by Democrats to fight McCain. Money that comes from many small donors like me. I do not want
my money wasted. Now I want it used where it will do the most good, cleaning out the nest of Repukes that have nearly destroyed this country.

Obama has worked for this nomination and has been brilliantly effective. We need to focus on the GE now.

She cannot win now. It is over and she needs to leave the stage so we can
go about taking back the Whitehouse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kittycat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #29
46. Not to mention money that could be supporting other lower level candidates.
Such as in IL-14, where we're fighting to keep out of Repuke hands. Foster just won the Dem primary, and is in a neck and neck battle with the well known "Milk Nazi" of Kendall County. We have to keep that nut from taking Hastert's seat. There are candidates all over like Foster, that need funds and support, but aren't currently getting it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Big Blue Marble Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #46
48. That is a good point.
Just yesterday, I had to put off my state party when they asked for a donation. I told them that right now all my donations have to go to Obama.
I asked them to check back in two months. By then, I hope this over and I will be able to start supporting our local candidates better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ieoeja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #48
52. Which in IL-14's case would be too late.

Hastert resigned early instead of finishing out his term. So they are holding a special election in early March instead of waiting for the general in November.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kittycat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #52
72. Yes, we vote March 8th I believe.
There was a post today in our State forum showing that Foster has a slight lead - 45/41, but that can change with the wind around here. We're more red than our neighboring county - Dupage. It's really important for us to flip to blue this year, or we're sunk. Oberweis is just bad, bad, news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoFlaJet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #48
58. Hillary Clinton doesn't care about that
all she, and her clan care about is Hillary. they will do whatever they can to try and win this nomination-it ain't happening so their plan B is to try and get John McCain elected so they can run again in 2012-the democratic party just like Bush with the republicans is always the second or third consideration BEHIND THEIR AMBITIONS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fluffdaddy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #58
70. Hillary is a life long democrat. She would never pull "your" plan B
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mdmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #70
89. she was never a goldwater conservative?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ieoeja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #70
91. No. She was a paid staffer at the RNC in 1968.

But as a member of the Rockefeller delegation she was treated rudely by Nixon's supporters. So she changed parties.

She didn't change because of the war.
She didn't change because of civil rights.
she didn't change because of poverty.
She changed parties because some Republics were mean to her personally.

You can see why some of us question her loyalty to Democratic policies.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 05:28 PM
Response to Reply #70
93. She is NOT a life long Democrat
Edited on Tue Feb-26-08 05:29 PM by goclark
She was a Goldwater Republican girl.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fluffdaddy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #93
94. 40 years is life long in my book
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alexander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #94
105. I guess Reagan was a lifelong Democrat in your book.
It wasn't until he was nearly 50 that he became a Republican.

Your avatar is telling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fluffdaddy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #105
106. Telling what, That I'm a Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton supporter?
I'm not trying to hide it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alexander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 11:34 PM
Response to Reply #106
107. Way to dodge the issue. Was Reagan a lifelong Democrat?
Edited on Tue Feb-26-08 11:35 PM by Alexander
He was a Democrat for 40 years. By your estimate, that's a lifetime.

So, does Ronald Reagan fit your criteria? Yes or no?

I suppose now that I think about it, your DLC avatar is telling - in that it's no surprise that you are evading the question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fluffdaddy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 08:15 AM
Response to Reply #107
110. If this is a big deal for you.....here's my answer
Edited on Wed Feb-27-08 08:20 AM by Fluffdaddy
Ronald Reagan was a Democrat for half his political life. Hillary has been Democrat for 99% have her political life. If you are so Petty as to pin her as a GOP'er for who she worked for 40 years ago.....fine.

BTW: The DLC is the main reason we won back both houses.

Texas/Ohio/Pennsylvania.........bring it home for us baby.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
superkia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #58
77. I think her and Bill are just a part of the wealthy elite that are trying...
to enslave us with poverty and she is just the elites first choice because they thought the American people would be happy with a D in office. If the elite cant have their first choice, they will go with their second choice...McCain and she is just trying to destroy Obamas chance of beating McCain if she cant get in. Just because someone starts out one way in life, corruption, money and power can always change some people and I believe she is one of them. I don't think its just all about her winning, I think its the elites agenda that is number one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grace0418 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #46
81. Milk Nazi! That's great. Oberweiss is such an ass. It's too bad, his dairy products
are delicious, but I haven't bought them since I found out about him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ORDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #29
64. And the Senate and House seats, please don't forget about those!
Else, even Obama's not going to get much done against the Gooper obstructionism.

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kittycat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #64
73. Exactly! I'm very concerned about that.
Edited on Tue Feb-26-08 02:42 PM by Kittycat
Monkeyboy wouldn't have been able to get anything done, if we had total Dem control when he took office. Now we're barely able to block anything, and not even that most of the time. We need a veto-proof majority, and I don't see that happening with Clinton. And having this drag on longer, is just going to hurt in finances and bad press, those running for these all important seats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemzRock Donating Member (824 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #10
32. Well put.. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rene Donating Member (758 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #1
67. Dodd's a traitor. What kind of Cabinet post was he offered?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kittycat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #67
74. "Traitor"? This isn't free republic. Go there, if you want to do that kind of nonsense.
Dodd is one of the good guys.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
2. Screw Dodd, lol. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
3. yup, cause you know how they get when they're angry
:eyes: (do these folks actually listen to themselves??)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Big Blue Marble Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #3
37. Gawd, read sexism into everything.
Do you realize that you are participating in reverse sexism while trivializing the raised consciousness that
we feminists have worked towards for over three decades.

Your asinine quote is not what he said. He said it was a difficult conversion. And I am sure it was.
They are Senate colleagues from neighboring states. But all you see is sexism.

bigtree, you need a clearer mirror. Or at least use Windex on the one you are using.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #37
54. I call em like I see 'em. Sexism is the least of what's wrong with this post.
If you're 'feminism' is comfortable with the poster's characterizations of Hillary Clinton, then you are certainly in good company here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Big Blue Marble Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #54
76. No I am not comfortable with the sexist tones that surface
Edited on Tue Feb-26-08 02:48 PM by Big Blue Marble
in Hillary attacks. Banshee is inappropriate as other sexist labels that get thrown around with ease.
And I am equally disturbed by the charge sexism that gets thrown around with ease as well.

If your post was meant as criticism to the banshee comment rather that the Dodd quote I stand
corrected. I may have misunderstood your meaning and I apologize.

Yet far too many here and elsewhere many are faulting sexism as the explanation as to
why Hillary is not getting traction. That, IMO, is a red herring that does great disservice
to our cause of advancing women and their issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #54
83. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Beausoir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 08:20 PM
Response to Reply #83
97. ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
4. I sure it was not easy for him. But you have to try to demean Hillary in the rest
of post don't you!! Shame on you
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jillan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #4
26. More Obamadrama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
samdogmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
6. What a - - - - -!
As I explained earlier in a SNL thread, you can only use this term if you support Hillary. If you don't it's derogatory!

So there, SNL Hillary fans... ( !!!!!! )

I REST MY CASE!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
7. Oh the horrors, I wonder if she went after him with a rolling pin?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabatha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #7
22. LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marie26 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #7
38. Or throwing plates
That also seems to be a popular image. I'm sure Sen. Clinton was as gracious w/Dodd as she was w/Sen. Kennedy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
8. I'll bet it wasn't fun - "Shame on you Chris Dodd." nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cooolandrew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #8
40. Oh come on. Don't you feel there is something wrong if she has few friends in the senate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #40
44. I was just teasing about what she may have said to him...
Edited on Tue Feb-26-08 02:08 PM by polichick
I'm sure she has friends in the Senate ~ these guys just see the writing on the wall, they know people have had enough of the negativity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Joad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #8
60. should have looked at the other posts first. should have known someone
would use that line first.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
9. Exclusive inside HQ photo when Hillary was told the news


:scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
11. I wonder if the sky opened and light came down
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
La Lioness Priyanka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
12. banshee?
nice one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. banshee
The Banshee (IPA: /ˈbænʃiː/), from the Irish bean sí ("woman of the síde" or "woman of the fairy mounds") is a female spirit in Irish mythology, usually seen as an omen of death and a messenger from the Otherworld. Her Scottish counterpart is the bean shìth (also spelled bean-shìdh).

Not exactly a positive thing....


it's amazing the amount of sexist crap that rolls from the keyboards of some of these Obama supporters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
La Lioness Priyanka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. i know. its amazing that these people then turn around and call themselves progressive
my grandfather was more progressive
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grace0418 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #12
82. I agree. That's going too far.
The folks on both extremes of this primary really need to give it a rest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
13. It ought to be sobering
I'm sure it was tough for her to hear as it was tough news for him to deliver. Dodd is such a stand up guy for calling her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #13
24. And yet Connecticut went
for Obama.. That's what I was thinking..how gallant for Senator Dodd to call hilary first. I can't wait to read his endorsement of Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Midlodemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #13
27. Dodd is a great guy. I have always admired him.
Worked for him for a bit as well. Great, great guy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #27
39. Nice to hear a first hand experience!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cooolandrew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #27
41. When the finest Democrats in the senate are for Barack you know he is a leader...
Edited on Tue Feb-26-08 01:44 PM by cooolandrew
... I know Boxer is neutral but I have watched her in the senate and she is very good friends with Barack too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kerstin Donating Member (519 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
14. Her staff is unusually loyal to her. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Metric System Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
16. "it wasn't a fun conversation to have" You could take that comment a few different way. He could
just mean that it was difficult for him to break the news to her, rather than it was a screaming match.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BenDavid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
17. here again is another backstabbing democrat that needed the
help of bill clinton and received it. So many over the years have asked bill and hillary for help and they offered it, but now just like kerry they backstab them both.

I do not feel sad for either clinton. They will have a most productive life but what I feel sad about is how easily the democratic party is aligning itself behind a candidate who himself said he was not experienced enough to be president. Well maybe we will not have to go through another 4 years with someone that should not have even been considered for this position.....personally obama reminds me so much like jimmy carter.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
milkyway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. Thank you for providing a very succinct argument for the nomination of Barack Obama.
How democratic of you--if someone prefers a candidate other than Hillary, they're a backstabber. Don't think--just shut the fuck up and follow your Clinton marching orders! Thank goodness it's only one more week of this nonsense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BenDavid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #21
61. gee, you think maybe I have a hole in my soul? maybe obama
will produce a dvd for all of you so that when he loses, you will have something to fall back on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoFlaJet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #61
68. no I think you have
another "agenda" which trumps anything the democratic party has or does-you'll be a neo-con in no time
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beausoir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 08:20 PM
Response to Reply #68
98. "you'll be a neo-con in no time"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JimGinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #17
25. You Make Me Laugh...
"another backstabbing democrat ". After what Hillary did to Kerry? :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cooolandrew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #17
43. Barack has proved his learning curve by beating huge name recongntion. He also...
Edited on Tue Feb-26-08 01:49 PM by cooolandrew
... has worked harder than any Democrat ever to increase funds for all his friends in the senate. Barack by all accounts, is holding the party together, and they respect him, profoundly for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoFlaJet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #17
49. Oh my God
you gotta be fucking kidding me-Kerry backstabbed HER????? Let me remind you Ben hur of your heroine throwing John Kerry under the bus for making a joke about George W Bush-she was the second senator to come out to condemn him-right after her "good friend" John McCain-it was disgusting-as are most of your posts
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beausoir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #49
99. "it was disgusting-as are most of your posts "
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K Gardner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #17
55. There you go again..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #17
63. Oh please with the experience thing already
Edited on Tue Feb-26-08 02:20 PM by truedelphi
Bill CLinton hailed from a rather small state and was only the governor there.

He went on to win the WH and then immediately there was a stir about his (and Hillary's) proposals for National Health Insurance Plan and the idea that gays in the military should be left alone.

Both of those items had to be abandonned, as Bill and Hillary did not know how to counter the attacks on those two policies. The C Presidency could be considered an experiment in "wonk-ishness" more than a demonstration of political maneuvering that ensures legislative success.

Most "successes" that the Clinton WH achieved were RW affairs - The 1996 Telecom bill, the NAFTA legistlation, the "reform" of the welfare program.

They made no headway on campaign finance reform.

Perhaps the one contribution to society that was most favorable was the Clinton success in creating a government budgetary surplus. And it has been said that part of the motivation for that was to help keep Social Security solvent for years to come.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snappyturtle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #17
71. Are you suggesting there should be some Quid pro Quo here?
That's something, I thought, we are trying to get rid of.

I can only hope that former President Carter can see a little of himself in Obama. President Carter did some things I didn't like, as with all our presidents imho, but oh how much better we would be today had we REALLY listened and enacted his energy policy. Let's remember who the enemy is here...the republicans!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
weezie1317 Donating Member (480 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #17
75. So he should have endorsed HRC because of FAVORS given by the Clintons???
Wow! Talk about back room politics and dirty favors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
apocalypsehow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 08:39 PM
Response to Reply #17
103. And here again is something I posted in another thread to help un-confuse my fellow Democrats who
have fallen for the "ready on day one"/"experience" meme the Clinton campaign has been so fervently peddling as one of her great "assets":

After graduating from Yale Law School, she briefly works for the Watergate committee. Then it's off to Arkansas and a law practice. Good legal experience, but hardly rigorous seasoning for the presidency.

She is also the first lady of Arkansas for a number of years, and then during the eight years of the Clinton presidency the cabinet level department she heads gives her oodles and gobs of that "experienc-"...what? What's that you say? She didn't hold a cabinet level post in the Clinton administration? Ah, that's right: she graduated from being Arkansas's first lady to being the nation's first lady. All well and good - absolutely nothing wrong with that.

Let's move on-....what? Ah yes: you're quite right. She did run a health care task force for her husband from 1993 to 1994, and it was thanks to that sterling leadership that every single person in America today is covered by a health system that is the envy of the worl-...oh, wait, well, let's move on.

She has been in the United States Senate for seven years and counting. Her "experience" in the real mechanics of government, such as it is, comes from her time in that body. So, she is four years more "experienced" in an actual institution of the United States government than her opponent is. That's a mighty thin reed for Clinton supporters to dismissively sneer at Senator Obama over....

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 04:06 AM
Response to Reply #103
109. If the voters wanted experience--
--we'd be looking at a Biden-Dodd-Richardson race right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #17
104. When did Chris Dodd need Bill Clinton's help? NT
NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
milkyway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
19. Meet me in New Haven and let's have a real debate!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Medusa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
23. What's most striking to me is that people who know her, work with her
like Dodd, are endorsing Obama. Says it all doesn't it? They chose him over her "experience".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 01:31 PM
Original message
She has far more congressional endorsements
than Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nailzberg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
28. It's never fun to be scolded.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
30. Screaming banshee?
Jesus fucking christ, the blatant sexism here is out of control.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cooolandrew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #30
45. I stand against the sexist commentsthey are not helpful to Barack please respect the ladies people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoFlaJet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #30
51. and the blatant "I am a victim" bullshit
from Hillary and all her surrogates and supporters here is laughable-and hopefully OVER in a week-I'm sick of these people accusing Obama supporters of everything under the sun-women hating, gay bashing, anti-democratic BULLSHIT I read every day here. Stop playing the fucking martyr and admit it-YOUR CANDIDATE HAS COMMITTED THE BIGGEST POLITICAL BLUNDER IN RECENT HISTORY
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoFlaJet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #30
79. What do you have against black men Monkey funk?
why are YOU a racist?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beausoir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 08:19 PM
Response to Reply #79
96. "why are YOU a racist".
Edited on Tue Feb-26-08 08:25 PM by Beausoir
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tishaLA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
31. "screaming banshee" huh?
You need to rethink that. Try to be respectful, at the very least, of someone who has been a very effective senator.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cooolandrew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #31
35. To get things doen a person needs unity. Most senators are backing Barack.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #35
42. Most senators are backing Barack?
Did you just make that up?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoFlaJet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #31
62. that's debatable
there are a lot of us here who would like to see Bobby Kennedy Jr run for her seat in 2012
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cooolandrew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
33. I know if they can't work with her. How can we?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anamandujano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
34. So Dodd released this info to the press, but can he upstage Britney
for the day?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marie26 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
36. There's no sexism in this campaign
Edited on Tue Feb-26-08 01:33 PM by Marie26
No siree. Democrats call Sen. Biden & Dodd "screaming banshees" all the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
COFoothills Donating Member (216 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #36
47. I heard the same banshee term used to describe...
...Howard Dean four years ago. Was it sexist then?

Give me a break. Far as I am concerned she has wholly earned that criticism with her behavior since the last debate...and that has nothing to with her plumbing and everything to do with the crap coming out of her mouth.

I swear, some of you HRC supporters are convinced of this misogynist conspiracy to defeat her. It ain't there. She's been a lousy candidate and she ran a strategically unsound and poorly managed campaign. That's why she losing and it nothing to do with gender.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marie26 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #47
50. Bull
HRC is losing for some very valid reasons, and for some very invalid ones. I can't believe the blatant sexism here & other places, and people's inability (or unwillingness) to call it out when they see it. She's been called every slur against women imaginable - shrill, banshee, witch, bitch, bi-polar, emotionally erratic, mata-hari seducer & destroyer of men! LOL. There's a common thread running through all these slurs, and a common archetype: the witch. In fairy tales, the good women are submissive & search for a man to fulfill their dreams; while the bad women are "witches" and "evil stepmothers" and "wicked queens" - powerful, independent, frightening. This misogyny goes bone-deep & is systemic in our society. And any woman who seeks power or achieves success is automatically switched from the "good woman" category to the "evil woman" catagory. That's how the patriarchy continues. It's very disheartening. I don't know if we'll ever have a female President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
COFoothills Donating Member (216 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #50
53. When a good female candidate runs a good campaign...
...and has the right message that people take to at that particular time and place...you'll have a female president.

The numbers of qualified women are growing each election cycle. Senators, Congresswomen, Governors....there's some pretty great women out there in our government.

Hillary Clinton just wasn't the right one at the right time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoFlaJet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 02:23 PM
Original message
I was saying the same thing to my wife last night
just like Jesse Jackson wasn't the right African American in 84 or 88 HRC is NOT the right woman for the job now-she's running a horrible campaign-and it has nothing to do with gender-it's all about the war vote and the people she has giving her advice
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ORDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #53
65. Napolitano for VP, then Pres. in '16. n/t
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #50
78. "bi-polar" is a slur against women?
Most of the persons I know with bipolar affective disorder are men.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marie26 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #78
86. IMO yeah.
Edited on Tue Feb-26-08 03:50 PM by Marie26
Because of the context in which it's used. Bi-polar, schizo, crazy b*tch, etc. are flung around w/regularity to describe Clinton. People aren't seriously saying that they believe she is manic-depressive, rather it's just another way to demean & discredit her. The "crazy b*tch" sterotype is a misogynistic staple, along w/the "evil stepmother", "wicked queen", etc. For a close example, these stereotypes are all over this very thread.

Imagine if Dodd had endorsed Clinton instead, and said that it was a hard call to have to make to Obama. Would people be interpreting that to mean that Obama hit him with rolling pins, became a screeching banshee, etc.? No. It wouldn't even occur to them. Clinton reached out & shook Ted Kennedy's hand after he endorsed Obama, worked w/Republicans who tried to impeach her husband, etc. And yet people think she became a "crazy witch" when Dodd endorsed Obama? Huh? It's like people don't see Clinton, the person, at all. Instead, people see instead the image of what a "wicked witch" would do & then envision HRC doing the same thing - however little relation that has to reality. IMO people have the negative female stereotypes already fully-formed in their heads, & then project it onto Clinton. It might be just as easy to do that to any female presidential candidate. It's easy to do; our society already provides the models to use.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #86
87. The only mention of rolling pins and thrown dishes has been from Clinton supporters
Edited on Tue Feb-26-08 03:54 PM by dmesg
Senator Clinton, like her husband, is famous for holding a grudge and having a temper. Frankly her husband is even more famous for it. The OP as far as I can tell suggested that she yelled at Dodd. She has yelled at people before, and it would not surprise many people if she did that in this situation, too.

ON EDIT: I missed the "banshee" reference in the OP, which I suppose is fair enough to complain about, though President Clinton has been called similarly negative things for his temper.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marie26 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #87
88. Did you not read the OP?
"Screaming banshee", the topic of my post? That's a sexist stereotype. It would greatly surprise me if she yelled at Dodd, since she was very gracious w/ Sen. Kennedy. I think Clinton cares about her relationships & standing in the Senate & would not jeapardized those relationships by alienating her collegues. She is a professional, if nothing else. And I seriously doubt that she'd become an unhinged screaming banshee at the news, however much satisfaction people might have in imagining that. And I do think it's sexism that people will automatically go there - IMO that's how sexist stereotypes come out in ways that people aren't even aware of.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scurrilous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
56. I imagine not. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkansas Granny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
57. I don't imagine it was a fun conversation to have. If he had decided
to endorse Clinton I don't imagine his conversation with Obama would have been fun either. I don't think it's fair to automatically assume that his comment was based on her behavior.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressIn2008 Donating Member (848 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #57
69. I agree - I assumed he was talking about his own feelings. Why use "screaming banshee"?
Although there is the "went after him with the rolling pin" remark, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Joad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
59. I could imagine "Shame on you, Christopher Dodd!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ORDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #59
66. I wonder how far he had to hold the earpiece from his head. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 08:24 PM
Response to Reply #66
102. Why do you assume she screamed at him. She could have cried, which would also have been unpleasant
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beausoir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
80. Sexist slop.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #80
84. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Beausoir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 08:01 PM
Response to Reply #84
95. "it must be since you seem to hate blacks".
Nothing left to be said. Nothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 03:41 PM
Response to Original message
85. It would be difficult to tell a long time friend and colleague that you were
endorsing a different candidate. I'm sure it was hard for both of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
intaglio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
90. Please take out the objectionable term "Screaming Banshee"
You might want to substitute "unreasoning fury" - still not good (if you know the origin of the word fury) but better than calling her a maelevolent spirit of doom which is the currently understood meaning of Banshee. The original meaning has been lost with the original words "bean sidhe"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
92. Screaming banshee??????
Edited on Tue Feb-26-08 05:24 PM by Beacool
I never thought that I'd say this about a Democrat, but how I'm going to enjoy watching the Republicans throw everything, including the kitchen sink, at Obama in the GE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 08:23 PM
Response to Original message
100. I bet it would have been hilarious to listen in on though
I hope Agent Mike's friends who are assigned to listen to our politicians had a good time,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 08:24 PM
Response to Original message
101. Hillary told him I dare you go against the Clinton Politcal Machine
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 03:52 AM
Response to Original message
108. Since you didn't hear it, how do you know what her tone of voice was? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 06:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC