Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why do we keep enabling Matt Drudge?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 09:27 PM
Original message
Why do we keep enabling Matt Drudge?
I'm Matt Drudge.

I'm a far right, agenda ridden, unbalanced, professional liar.

Tomorrow, if I was so inclined, I could splash, in bold letters, on my website:
OBAMA CAMP CIRCULATES EMAILS ABOUT HILLARY LESBIAN AFFAIR

along with a picture of a supposed paramour.

And because I'm Matt Drudge, the story would then play all day long on every cable news channel, be covered by Politico, Time, Newsweek, and even merit a mention in next day's NY Times and Washington Post.

Meanwhile the Obama camp would be forced to respond that they didn't think lesbianism was anything bad, that they weren't sure, but were confident that none of their staff had done this (but they couldn't flatly deny it, because they have 800 campaign staffmembers).

The resulting stench would leave an impression in the voter's minds that Hillary might swing both ways and that the Obama was running a nasty, homophobic, underhanded campaign. It would also, conveniently, divide the Democratic electorate.

And I could have made the entire thing up.

Because, you see, I'm Matt Drudge.

Nationwide, reporters robotically repeat what I spew on my website without doing any fact checking or making any kind of demands for verification.

I'm Matt Drudge. I'm a disturbed fuck of a human being, but I can singlehandly dominate a new cycle with anything that pops into my deranged head.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Hawkeye-X Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 09:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. Because without Clinton, Drudge would be a useless trashcan
begging for pennies getting ignored.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anigbrowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 09:32 PM
Response to Original message
2. You forgot one thing
The Obama campaign, as you say, couldn't flatly deny it because they have 800 staffers.

But they could disavow it, condemn it, and say that if it was found to come from anyone working on the campaign that person would be fired forthwith.

And sorry, for all Drudge is a gossip-monger I don't thin he just randomly makes shit up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NastyRiffraff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 09:58 PM
Response to Reply #2
13. Drudge doesn't make things up?? You're kidding, right?
Just for starters, remember the so-called Kerry affair? Made up out of whole cloth. There are others, too. True, he normally takes a piece of something and blows it up to what seems like a complete story. But yes, he's a serial inventor, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 10:59 PM
Response to Reply #2
19. So
you think that Peggy Noonan is highbrow and Drudge is honest.

Ooooookay. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddiejoan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 09:33 PM
Response to Original message
3. Been done
http://drudgereport.com/flashhh.htm




Cos ya know --Hillary and Drudge are such good friends.
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. I remember
but he didn't blame it on "emails" "circulating" from a rival's campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 09:34 PM
Response to Original message
4. But WHY did Drudge say it was from the Clinton camp if it wasn't?
Edited on Mon Feb-25-08 09:44 PM by rocknation
Surely he must know that he's the last person a Dem would give info to. Come to think of it, if Drudge DID make it up, shouldn't the Clinton camp have taken him to task FIRST? After all, if he made it up, that's grounds for libel. Besides, "We aren't aware of the photo" is a far cry from "No, we didn't give Drudge any photo!"

:crazy:
rocknation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. How do they know some idiotic staff member didn't email it to
another idiotic staff member and Drudge got ahold of the email? They don't want to categorically deny something which might come back to bite them.

The point is this is all accepted as truth by the media, with not ONE ounce of proof or verification. And none of them demand that Drudge deny it, because they want him to link to their future stories and they don't want to piss him off. It's totally insane.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Rinaldo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 09:46 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. He said it was "obtained" from the Clinton campaign
It is almost like diplomatic talk. Some things are said to be received from a camp, some things are said to be shopped around by a camp. Some things are obtained. Thieves "obtain" the contents of a safe when they break into a home to get it. Drudge never claimed that those internal emails between a few staffers (who could have been low level staffers in Rhodie Island for all we know) were sent to him by the Clinton campaign. And in the past those types of things HAVE been said when the Clinton campaign wanted the media to pay attention to some issue they felt was being under reported.

There have been plenty of embarrassing leaks of strategy memos and the like that one campaign "obtains" from another. That happens a lot in politics either through moles or carelessness or unguarded conversation or whatever. And there are plenty of things obtained by rivals of a candidate that the candidate's campaign is not happy to see "obtained" by them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 09:55 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. No he did not say that at all
Read the Drudge piece carefully with an eye to what it actually says, not what he wants the casual reader to think it says.

If you've followed Drudge's antics for the last fifteen years, the story decoded is: The email in question was forwarded to Drudge by someone NOT in the Clinton campaign. It was something NOT meant to be publicized that someone with an agenda gave to Drudge.

The idea that the Clinton campaign gave this to Drudge is bizarre, since the story is quite unfavorable to the Clinton campaign.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cant trust em Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 10:11 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Clinton could have come out smelling like a rose
if she would have spun this the right way. She could have blasted Drudge and the RW conspiracy but there was some muddling of message. This is going to be tricky to shake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 11:05 PM
Response to Reply #4
20. Gee, why would Drudge want Democrats to fight with each other?
I can't imagine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheDebbieDee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 11:08 PM
Response to Reply #4
22. To cause division among Democrats?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cbayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 09:42 PM
Response to Original message
6. Because we are stupidly and blindly destroying our own candidates.
And we have created the perfect atmosphere for the republicans to take us down.

Seriously.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HowHasItComeToThis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. YOU ARE SO CORRECT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYPat Donating Member (25 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 10:17 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. Yep, Drudge hurt both candidates with this!
The Republicans are probably amused. This campaign has also seen Democrats attacking and denigrating the record of the only President that we successfully elected in 30 years. That and unleashing all the anti-woman, anti-baby-boomer sentiment for public consumption should come back to haunt us in the fall.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 09:54 PM
Response to Original message
10. I am SO not going to enable him that I'm not even going to look at your thread!
Oops. :blush:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 09:55 PM
Response to Original message
12. It's sad. And now Kristol is being praised too.
Some people are fucked up.

But hey, did you see who got TS'ed?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 10:57 PM
Response to Reply #12
18. Yeah
I was actually going to pm you. I guess I wasn't the only one being stalked. heheh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 11:06 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. Thought of you right away when I saw he was gone.
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 10:26 PM
Response to Original message
16. The photo scandal is a wonderful hit piece on both campaigns.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 10:27 PM
Response to Original message
17. The photo scandal is a wonderful hit piece on both campaigns.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 09:52 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC