Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Factcheck.org on CNN just said the BO campaign lied in both Ohio mailers

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Freida5 Donating Member (649 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 08:33 PM
Original message
Factcheck.org on CNN just said the BO campaign lied in both Ohio mailers
http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/obama_mailings_false.html

what kind of campaign idiot would put a student newspapers quote evaluating a health plan. my observation not factcheck
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
liberalnurse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 08:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yes! Shame on You Obama!
Edited on Mon Feb-25-08 08:37 PM by liberalnurse
Damn-it anyway! You just keep decieving Obama.

Ohio need not be bled out and mislead anymore. We have suffered so!

Obama, your campaign shall sink and you soon will find humility.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PretzelWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #1
30. you sound kind of whiney
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 08:53 PM
Response to Reply #30
41. any you sound like SOUR GRAPES
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalnurse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 08:54 PM
Response to Reply #30
43. No, I'm angry as hell . You should be here with me in Ohio.
The people are suffering.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Berry Cool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 09:08 PM
Response to Reply #43
57. I'm with you in Ohio. I know the people are suffering.
They just don't all seem to agree with you as to who can best help relieve the suffering.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalnurse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 09:14 PM
Response to Reply #57
60. As a nurse who works with a Community access Clinic....
and the Emergency Room, I see the misery of every age group. I can barely talk about it, what I see that is..... All a direct result of the republican carpetbaggers causing excessive urban decay.

Hillary has the best action plan and sincere empathy to work with all of us in Ohio to renew our lives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #60
67. Thanks for you real life story. adds validity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 08:36 PM
Response to Original message
2. Good to hear validation
it was pretty obvious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 09:09 PM
Response to Reply #2
58. but so much damage have been done already
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 08:36 PM
Response to Original message
3. You are not telling the truth
Edited on Mon Feb-25-08 08:37 PM by Kurt_and_Hunter
I saw the same segment, and factcheck guy didn't say "lied"

He cited the factual problem with the NAFTA mailer and criticized a similar Hillary NAFTA mailer.

I support Hillary and thought he should have been much harder on the healthcare mailer, but he wasn't.

And he certainly didn't call either one a "lie"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 08:41 PM
Response to Reply #3
13. I call the fact that the mailer included the debunked statement that she had called it a 'boon'
makes that statement in the mailer a LIE
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Window Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #3
26. Desperate.
Unreal
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #26
102. "We find that a [BO} mailer criticizing her position on trade is indeed misleading
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thunder rising Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 08:37 PM
Response to Original message
4. I think you inflated the the analysis. Hillary, how is all this spin and lie working for you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
totodeinhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 08:37 PM
Response to Original message
5. CNN's anti Obama bias is palpable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. Rovian tactic: KILL THE MESSENGER
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avrdream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #11
29. Yep.
Strange seeing those tactics around here. I thought DU was better than that.

This OP should generate a good discussion......"should" being the key word.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
totodeinhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 09:03 PM
Response to Reply #11
52. It's not a Rovian tactic if the criticism is valid
Sometimes media outlets are biased. For instance, would you also call it a Rovian tactic to call Fox News biased? Everyone knows that Fox News is a right wing propaganda machine, and there is nothing wrong with saying so. Likewise, there is nothing wrong with calling out CNN on their bias. For instance, that racist Lou Dobbs was shamelessly shilling for Clinton earlier today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #52
56. up date yourself about the media bias on the candidates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
totodeinhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 09:11 PM
Response to Reply #56
59. You didn't answer my question.
Is it a Rovian tactic to call Fox News biased? And if it is not, why is it a Rovian tactic to call out other media outlets when they are also biased? Have you seen Dobbs lately? He is shamelessly biased against Obama.

You accused me of using Rovian tactics. If you are going to make such an outlandish charge against me, then you should be prepared to back it up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #59
75. too bad
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JAbuchan08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #75
95. yeah, for you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #52
93. Any and all criticism of Obama is called "Rovian" here
people don't know what the word means.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dchill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 04:23 PM
Response to Reply #93
98. Any and all criticism of Clinton is called "Rovian" here
too. And I know what it means. I'm certain that you know which candidate brought it up first. That in itself is "Rovian."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ncteechur Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 08:43 PM
Response to Reply #5
19. Not sure if it is anti-Obama but CNN sure is pro-Hillary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 08:50 PM
Response to Reply #19
37. ha ha---it is really the silly season to her you say that
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Whisp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #19
66. in full swing for Hillary today, for sure!
sure can tell they got the Big Memo today.

Lou Dobbs smugly giggling about Obama's pic of the day and making fun of people who dress funny in other countries and beneath it is for a President or rep of the U.S. to dress up so silly. The big asshole. Like a business suit should be the standard cultural wear around the globe. The big asshole.

John Roberts, the big asshole, saying they are both attacking each other - showing the clips of Hillary's latest embarassments but nothing exists of Obama acting so shamefully so no vid on That. but Roberts the big asshole making it sound as if Obama has lowered himself to Hillary's level nonetheless.

Candy Crowley inserting a snark in the 'someone said' jackal fashion about it could have been Obama's camp that sent out that pic today. No sources, no nothing, just her own big asshole idea to throw that in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anigbrowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 08:48 PM
Response to Reply #5
33. You think so? I haven't been bothered by any.
I mostly watch CNN for TV news, I think they have been pretty fair to all candidates. Sure, every so often I hear some remark about Obama I don't like, but then the same goes for every candidate.

My favorite CNN moment so far this primary season, from a question to (Clinton supporter) Paul Begala:

Anderson Cooper: Paul, what do you think is the biggest problem facing Hillary Clinton?
Paul Begala: Well, she keeps losing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ingac70 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 08:38 PM
Response to Original message
6. Thanks for that link...
it has some very helpful info..

"In closing, we'd just note that Clinton is no innocent on sending out misleading mailers. We reported on Feb. 6 that a mailing by her campaign contained a "big distortion" of Obama's position on Social Security taxes and falsely implied that he had "no plan" to address mortgage foreclosures. It also attacked him for voting for a "Dick Cheney" energy bill that gave "huge tax breaks to oil companies," when in fact the bill gave a net tax increase to oil companies."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 08:39 PM
Response to Original message
7. Obama claimed in his response yesterday that they hadn't been debunked
That should get buried amidst all of the Clinton hate, here and on the networks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. They certainly have
hope this comes up in the debate tomorrow night.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #10
27. BO was so swave yesterday calling a NEWS conferences about this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dchill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 08:39 PM
Response to Original message
8. Get over yourself and stop grasping at straws!
About Obama's mailer:

We find that a mailer criticizing her position on trade is indeed misleading. One that attacks her health care plan we have previously described as straining the facts, though not exactly "false."

About Clinton's mailer:

We've also previously criticized Clinton for sending a mailer that twisted Obama's words and gave a false picture of his proposals on Social Security, home foreclosures and energy.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 08:42 PM
Response to Reply #8
17. sounds like Bush explaining away his own lies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dchill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #17
23. Not sure whether you agree w/me or not...
Maybe you should go into politics!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #8
96. so a half lie is better than a whole lie? A lie is a lie is a lie...get over yourself, he's not
perfect no one is!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dchill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #96
97. "A lie is a lie is a lie..."
I have always known that. I'm not the one who thinks it's OK. They both misrepresent the other's positions. They are both politicians. I'm over it, and I'm over myself. It's the ones like you who can't see that the sauce for the goose is equal to the sauce for the gander. Do yourself a favor and read it again:

http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/obama_mailings_false.html

She did it, too, and she did it first, and she did it more often. The OP suggests that is not the case, yet posts a link that disproves itself.

Have a NICE day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #97
99. "It's the ones like you who can't see ...
that the sauce for the goose is equal to the sauce for the gander. Do yourself a favor and read it again:"

You really don't know "ones like me" I've been saying it about both for a very long time, just get tired of people thinking Obama is the second coming, he is far from perfect, so is Clinton, and it's about time we all realize it and move on to fighting the repugs.

"She did it, too, and she did it first, and she did it more often." since when does two wrongs make a right?

I am having a very nice day!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dchill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #99
100. Then I guess I don't see...
why you're so angry with me!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #100
106. Not angry just trying to see what the differnce between "not exactly false" and
"false" are. If one is said to be stretching the truth is that not the same as lying? Some think a little white lie is ok, but it still a lie no matter how little. I repeat since when do two wrongs make a right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dchill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 10:55 PM
Response to Reply #106
108. The territory between "false" and "not exactly false"...
is where practically the whole universe of politics exists. So, the "difference" between the two is vast. If you want ethical purity, you are really, really looking in the wrong place. In my opinion, without getting into situational ethics or even a discussion of strict morality, small lies are not as bad as big lies. I believe that this is why we have 30-day jail sentences and the death penalty.

It is not a question of two wrongs making a right. The math isn't that simple - it never is. I don't want to start a flame war, but I assure you that it is my judgment that Barack is not as bad as Hillary, and that I'm open to having that view changed, but I'd really hate to find that Barack is worse, because then I'd have a hard time even voting in November. Two wrongs DON'T make a right, but often two small wrongs are much less that one larger one. It's the real world and, sadly, no one is perfect.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 08:40 PM
Response to Original message
9. HO HOO. BO on the TV said they were 'factual" ummm,,,,,, I like factcheck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Windy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #9
25. check Factcheck.org on HIllary's OHIO mailer on trade...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 08:41 PM
Response to Original message
12. factcheck sucks, they ignore her own book
Edited on Mon Feb-25-08 08:42 PM by sandnsea
2003: Hillary Clinton Expounded on Benefits of NAFTA, Calling it An Important Legislative Goal. “Creating a free trade zone in North America—the largest free trade zone in the world—would expand U.S. exports, create jobs and ensure that our economy was reaping the benefits, not the burdens, of globalization. Although unpopular with labor unions, expanding trade opportunities was an important administration goal. The question was whether the White House could focus its energies on two legislative campaigns at once . I argued that we could and that postponing health care would further weaken its chances.”

2003: Clinton Called NAFTA a “Victory” For President Clinton. In her memoir, published in 2003, Clinton wrote, “Senator Dole was genuinely interested in health care reform but wanted to run for President in 1996. He couldn’t hand incumbent Bill Clinton any more legislative victories, particularly after Bill’s successes on the budget, the Brady bill and NAFTA.”

Oh, and yes she does force people to buy insurance and I cannot for the life of me figure out why she's denying it. People know what the word mandate means.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 08:42 PM
Response to Reply #12
18. bitter much?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue-Jay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. So those quotes from her book are wrong?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 08:49 PM
Response to Reply #21
35. immaterial
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue-Jay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 08:52 PM
Response to Reply #35
39. Oh. That makes sense.
So....the quotes are accurate, but anyone who DARES post them is bitter?

Gotcha! :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #39
46. sure does. glad you agree
Edited on Mon Feb-25-08 08:58 PM by rodeodance
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue-Jay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 09:01 PM
Response to Reply #46
49. LOL!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 08:41 PM
Response to Original message
14. REC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 08:42 PM
Response to Original message
15. Did you actually read the article?
FactCheck didn't say Obama "lied"...

As for Hillary's mailers, I got some of her crap in Wisconsin where FactCheck clearly points out how she completely distorted Obama's record.

http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/youve_got_mailers.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #15
20. 'misleading' and 'straining the facts' is lying
Is that something Obama means to change in his administration? Stretching the definition of a lie?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. Did you read the link about Hillary's mailers?
Talk about LIES...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dchill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #22
28. If he DID read it...
he's not about to admit it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 08:48 PM
Response to Reply #22
34. divert, distract
dissemble . . . everything but account for you own candidate's actions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 08:53 PM
Response to Reply #34
40. are they wittiy---using tactics straight out of Rove's playbook!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anigbrowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 08:54 PM
Response to Reply #20
42. Factcheck accused both camps of doing so.
"In closing, we'd just note that Clinton is no innocent on sending out misleading mailers. We reported on Feb. 6 that a mailing by her campaign contained a "big distortion" of Obama's position on Social Security taxes and falsely implied that he had "no plan" to address mortgage foreclosures. It also attacked him for voting for a "Dick Cheney" energy bill that gave "huge tax breaks to oil companies," when in fact the bill gave a net tax increase to oil companies."

From the link in the OP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #15
38. We find that a mailer criticizing her position on trade is indeed misleading
We find that a mailer criticizing her position on trade is indeed misleading. One that attacks her health care plan we have previously described as straining the facts, though not exactly "false."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zach Donating Member (71 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 08:42 PM
Response to Original message
16. I don't get it...
Edited on Mon Feb-25-08 08:43 PM by zach
If you're going to take the effort to post about something like this, at least be honest about what was said. He clearly didn't say anything about either of the campaigns outright 'lying'. What the OP conveniently forgets to mention is that he said the HRC campaign was just as misleading in her mailers as well; even pointing out that her new mailers being sent out as recently as today, were just as misleading as his.

Being dishonest about something as trivial as what the 'factcheck guy' has to say, seems pretty pointless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 08:45 PM
Response to Original message
24. The paragraph you are conveniently ignoring from FactCheck......
In closing, we'd just note that Clinton is no innocent on sending out misleading mailers. We reported on Feb. 6 that a mailing by her campaign contained a "big distortion" of Obama's position on Social Security taxes and falsely implied that he had "no plan" to address mortgage foreclosures. It also attacked him for voting for a "Dick Cheney" energy bill that gave "huge tax breaks to oil companies," when in fact the bill gave a net tax increase to oil companies.


Hypocrite.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Windy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #24
31. Frieda always "triagulates" or "spins" for her candidate. She's left out pertinent facts inthe past
Nothing new for her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 08:56 PM
Response to Reply #31
45. " windy always "triagulates" or "spins" for her/his candidate"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gerrilea Donating Member (610 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 08:48 PM
Response to Original message
32. Don't you love how people now say "Fact Check" does mean anything
When it says something they don't like, like the truth...I accept the truth that the HRC camp has "spun" things, but the Obama supporters can't deal with the truth when their "savior" isn't perfect...wake up guys and gals...this is all POLITICS...anything is fair...don't forget the last two elections...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 09:01 PM
Response to Reply #32
48. the word HYPOCRITE comes to mind
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gerrilea Donating Member (610 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #48
55. AMEN!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #32
89. No way, Obama NEVER LIED!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Honeycombe8 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 08:50 PM
Response to Original message
36. You are mischaracterizing what factcheck says in its article.
All it said, basically, was that the mailer shouldn't have put the word "boon" in quotes.

As for the second, factcheck said the mailer about healthcare is not false. It just "strains" the facts by not explaining everything...the same as Clinton's mailers about Obama's positions have done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 09:00 PM
Response to Reply #36
47. Well --uess BO on TV yesterday should have said he "strained" the facts vs saying 'accurate"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 08:54 PM
Response to Original message
44. LETS HAVE SOME RECS--TAKE IT TO THE FRONT PAGE PLEASE
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 09:03 PM
Response to Original message
50. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #50
53. "goddamnit I'm so sick of the likes of youse"---What is a "youse"?
YOU are the liar!
Posted by Whisp


goddamnit I'm so sick of the likes of youse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anigbrowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 09:26 PM
Response to Reply #53
68. A plural form of you used in some parts of the US, most widely in New York.
As any fule kno.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #68
72. I am not from NY but thank you. and I am not a" fule" as you claim. Shame on you.

As any fule kno.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avrdream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #50
54. Did you go to the link?
Not lying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 09:03 PM
Response to Original message
51. " We leave it to our readers to decide whether they should be "outraged" or not" OUTRAGED!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 09:15 PM
Response to Original message
61. You're spinning: "We frankly find Clinton's past position on NAFTA to be ambivalent." n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #61
63. ""lacks context" and stretches the facts, but we can't agree that it is "false" as Clinton says."
Edited on Mon Feb-25-08 09:19 PM by ProSense
The mailers are not false.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 09:21 PM
Response to Reply #61
65. get into the NOW buddy: "We find that a mailer criticizing her position on trade is indeed misleadin
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 09:18 PM
Response to Original message
62. HURRAY FOR HILLARY--
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 09:19 PM
Response to Original message
64. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #64
69. get your facts straight before you spout off-OP was talking of Factck. Your post
Edited on Mon Feb-25-08 09:31 PM by rodeodance
brought in another article.





Topic subject YOU'RE THE LIAR
Topic URL http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x4769303#4770110
4770110, YOU'RE THE LIAR
Posted by Stephanie on Mon Feb-25-08 08:19 PM

They said no such thing.



Freida5 Donating Member (383 posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Mon Feb-25-08 07:33 PM
Original message
Factcheck.org on CNN just said the BO campaign lied in both Ohio mailers

http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/obama_mailings_...

what kind of campaign idiot would put a student newspapers quote evaluating a health plan. my observation not factcheck
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #69
71. WRONG - it's the same article
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #71
74. the factck form OP does not have the DU link which lead to the open left article -this
article is in addition to one provided for OP.






http://openleft.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=4137

Here's another direct quote from Hillary Clinton on NAFTA from a speech she gave to the DLC in 2002:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marie26 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 09:30 PM
Response to Original message
70. Did CNN report Factcheck's findings? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LadyVT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 09:34 PM
Response to Original message
73. THANK YOU for that link.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DUyellow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 09:53 PM
Response to Original message
76. Show me the quote that says he lied in both mailers
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 10:00 PM
Response to Reply #76
77. 'misleading' and 'straining the facts' is lying'--from post #20 Enough said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DUyellow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 11:07 PM
Response to Reply #77
80. LOL, He doesn't need to campaign for HRC, that is her job to tell people about her plan.
Edited on Mon Feb-25-08 11:07 PM by landonb16
far from lying
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 10:14 PM
Response to Original message
78. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #78
79. kicky
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johnny__Motown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 11:11 PM
Response to Original message
81. Good luck with that, see ya after the debate. (the word "Boon" is the only problem)
And can easily be countered with all the other quotes of her praising NAFTA.


As for the Mandate part of the other mailer, it is accurate. Maybe not fully explained but it is her job to explain her mandate, not his.


Good luck, enjoy your last week of the Clinton era while you can.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 11:17 PM
Response to Reply #81
82. It's only a problem because everyone, including Factcheck isn't representing it
Edited on Mon Feb-25-08 11:22 PM by ProSense
factually.

Here is the mailer (PDF)

The word "boon" is in quotes because it was picked up directly from a Newsday quote, which is attributed in the mailer.



Hillary's desperate moment, with video

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #82
104. And Newsday has stated they should not have used quote marks.
Newsday did not have a direct quote indicating she thought it was good for the economy at that time. Also, for that matter, Clinton's campaign did not contact Newsday to question the item after it appeared in print.

Obama's use of the citation in this way does seem misleading. The quotation marks make it look as if Hillary said "boon." It's an example of the kind of slim reeds campaigns use to try to win an office.

That said, Newsday should have been clearer.

http://www.newsday.com/services/newspaper/printedition/sunday/news/ny-lijani245590001feb24,0,5616373.story
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ArkySue Donating Member (647 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-25-08 11:24 PM
Response to Original message
83. K & R
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
84. It's "newspaper's"....not...
Edited on Tue Feb-26-08 11:17 AM by Hepburn
..."newspapers."

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 11:18 AM
Response to Original message
85. "In closing, we'd just note that Clinton is no innocent on sending out misleading mailers."
It's a draw.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
86. The Obama supporters don't care.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #86
87. Do you care?
In closing, we'd just note that Clinton is no innocent on sending out misleading mailers. We reported on Feb. 6 that a mailing by her campaign contained a "big distortion" of Obama's position on Social Security taxes and falsely implied that he had "no plan" to address mortgage foreclosures. It also attacked him for voting for a "Dick Cheney" energy bill that gave "huge tax breaks to oil companies," when in fact the bill gave a net tax increase to oil companies.




The false outrage from both sides is pathetic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anamandujano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #86
92. This is important, lying, distortion, hurting core issues.
When I told my friend about it, she just screamed (and I mean screamed) "HILLARY WON'T RELEASE HER TAXES."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
88. Your OP is completely fabricated. Factcheck debunked Hillary's claims
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CyberPieHole Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
90. Obama: Hope you can't rely on!
:kick: and rec

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
91. We said the mailer "lacks context" and stretches the facts, but we can't agree that it is "false."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
94. Hillary was right to counter attack against these false accusations. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #94
101. yes, she was. yes she was----and I am so glad she did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babsbunny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 04:58 PM
Response to Original message
103. We can't trust anything we read or hear, even on DU!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 05:05 PM
Response to Original message
105. Some Dems are using the GOP defense of pulling at a thread.
Apparently she didn't say the word "boon." That's the ONLY discrepancy, but it is a fact that she is on the record as saying NAFTA is swell.

The healthcare flier was dead-on accurate. She does have mandates.

That's the point. That's the issue. One simply cannot dismiss with an iota of credibility both fliers as being false by virtue of one word. But I fully expect them to keep screaming "lies" to try to drown out the truth.

No worries. The silly season will be over soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
my3boyz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
107. Oh please..it is not Obama's responsiblity to put every
aspect of his plan in a mailer. Hillary sent out mailers talking about 15 million being left out without explaining his plan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 08:14 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC