Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The web's first ever Obama / Clinton 2008 national county map

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 09:57 PM
Original message
The web's first ever Obama / Clinton 2008 national county map
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Bicoastal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 10:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. Where's landslide states Alaska and Hawaii?
x(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PresidentObama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 10:02 PM
Response to Original message
2. Go Edwards counties!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #2
26. My favorite Edwards county?
Oconee county, SC.

I'm also totally amused that Horry county went for Clinton. I spent the summer there a few years ago. I even have a library card. :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 10:03 PM
Response to Original message
3. Rural NV went to Obama
so something is wrong with the map.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Nevada's not colored in in this map
It's all Hillary-colored.

It's a variation on this one:

http://politics.nytimes.com/election-guide/2008/results/demmap/index.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doc03 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 10:09 PM
Response to Original message
4. That sort of looks like the one the Repugs like to
show off. Interesting though the Obama territories are rural areas that the Republicans always carry and Hillary's is the Democratic strongholds. Could it be Republicans are crossing over in an effort to eliminate Hillary? I heard some Limbaugh callers suggest Republicans do that to sabotage Hillary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 10:16 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. Yup. "Democrats" supporting Obama suddenly subscribe to the idea land votes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doc03 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 10:19 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Yea a lot of it is virtually uninhabited landmass. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anigbrowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 10:24 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. Nonsense
That's not true - go look at the county-by-county results on CNN or somesuch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 10:53 PM
Response to Reply #12
28. This is what the rethugs do every four years since they win almost all the counties and most states
Especially the geographically large states. A more accurate map would be adjusted to take into account population. Land doesn't vote. People do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doc03 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 10:21 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. Who voted coyotes and prairie dogs? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 10:27 PM
Response to Reply #9
18. Land like San Francisco, Boston, Oklahoma City....
and other big cities in states that Clinton won? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 11:22 PM
Response to Reply #9
30. Notice I hillary colored the states that Hillary won that lacked co data, this was not posted for
partisan purposes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 11:21 PM
Response to Reply #4
29. "Obama territories" like San Fran and St. Louis?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johnny__Motown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 10:12 PM
Response to Original message
5. All of Nevada? really? Obama got more delegates out of there. and New Mexico too?
And Missouri,


some of this looks off to me.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PresidentObama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Missouri is right, that much I can tell you n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 10:23 PM
Response to Reply #7
14. That's crazy shit
Clinton got virtually all teh counties except 5, but Obama pulled it off by 1%? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PresidentObama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 10:25 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. It's because Obama won the counties with St. Louis and Kansas City.
A lot of the rural counties Clinton won weren't as populated.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. Ah, thanks
:)

It seems like that happened in several states. Hillary got the hinterlands but Obama got the cities.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PresidentObama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 10:31 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. I was shocked by the results in Missouri.
I didn't think Hillary had a shot in hell.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. Well, MO wound up not counting by a nose
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 10:15 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. No, some of the states are not broken down by county in teh above map
Edited on Wed Feb-20-08 10:16 PM by XemaSab
County level data is not available for NM, ND, NE, ME and KS

http://politics.nytimes.com/election-guide/2008/results/demmap/index.html

(added Maine)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 11:23 PM
Response to Reply #5
31. Some states lack county data, I colored those for the person that won the state, its as close as I
could get.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goldcanyonaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 10:16 PM
Response to Original message
10. Florida should be Clinton, yeah, it doesn't count.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 10:17 PM
Response to Original message
11. New Mexico is not right. The three most populous counties went to Obama plus Catron County
with covers a lot of space.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 10:32 PM
Response to Reply #11
21. The New York times doesn't have that data up.
:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 10:25 PM
Response to Original message
17. This is terrific!
Thank you!

This NYTimes graph is about my favorite toy for this election; I have it up in the other window at all times.

(Are you going to add in Nevada? :D )
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 11:29 PM
Response to Reply #17
32. I thought it wasn't up w the county data, adding...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 11:37 PM
Response to Reply #17
33. There you go...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
electron_blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 10:37 PM
Response to Original message
23. Whoa - I didn't realize Edwards had such a hold on the aqueous counties. ;)
Nice map - I was looking for something like this earlier. Thx!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 10:44 PM
Response to Original message
24. I can't believe how nerdy I am!
Thinking: "When did Lassen county switch from Clinton to Obama?"

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PresidentObama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. DU should be renamed "Geek Squad"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 10:50 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. In the land of the geeks
the photoshopper is king. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 06:02 PM
Response to Original message
34. Thursday kick!
:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
35. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 03:54 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC