Shithead Pat Buchanan
PCIntern
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Wed Feb-20-08 08:13 PM
Original message
trying to soft-pedal this whole thing. Nothing to see here...just move on. We shall see about that...Fat Pat. You Smug Pig.
Seen the light
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Wed Feb-20-08 08:14 PM
Response to Original message
Nobody is saying he even had an affair, much less something illegal. Fuck MSNBC and the NY Times for going with this. Sorry, that's just how I feel. Don't get this story at all right now.
Thepricebreaker
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Wed Feb-20-08 08:16 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. They just made him look like a victim of a smear....
If Obama or Clinton don't mention it.. you know there is nothing to see.
PCIntern
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Wed Feb-20-08 08:16 PM
Response to Reply #1
McCain denies it so we have to assume it didn't happen. That's what Pat is saying...there's much more to this story...this is just the beginning. Pat's telling everyone to stay away from it...
Thepricebreaker
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Wed Feb-20-08 08:19 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. She is denying everything.. its END game.. If she said they did, it would be different..
writes3000
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Wed Feb-20-08 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
has more info. I don't like this kind of reporting but knowing how the NYT operates, I'm guessing there is more. They are trying to bait a reaction from McCain. It's a shitty way to report the news.
bigdarryl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Wed Feb-20-08 08:20 PM
Original message
writes3000 i agree with you they have more info plus i just heard that...
they have been working on this story since December
tishaLA
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Wed Feb-20-08 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #4
20. "trying to bait" is right
we all know about Sen McCain's infamous temper. It will be interesting to see whether he can control himself.
redstate_democrat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Wed Feb-20-08 08:26 PM
Response to Reply #4
THERE IS MORE. THIS IS HOW THE NYT WORKS. THEY WILL SIT BACK AND MAKE HIM MAKE AN ASS OUT OF HIMSELF. THIS IS THE TIP OF THE ICEBERG. NYT WOULDN'T RUN WITH AN APPARENT DUD LIKE THIS WITHOUT THERE BEING MORE. DON'T THEY HAVE A REPUTATION TO UPHOLD? LOL.
Raine
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Wed Feb-20-08 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Well one thing, it sure knocks that
nothing story about what Michelle Obama said off the front pages. :-)
thepurpose
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Wed Feb-20-08 08:18 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. The story is out now. Calling it a non-story is not going to make this go away.
What is important in all of this is the GOP is not happy having McCain at the top of ticket to begin with.
Barack_America
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Wed Feb-20-08 08:20 PM
Response to Reply #7
15. Even if it is a non-story?
Don't get me wrong, I'm sure there's a millions things out there that could nail McCain's ass to the wall, just not this one (as it now stands).
thepurpose
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Wed Feb-20-08 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #15
22. Your missing my point. It does not matter if this is true or not. The GOP is not in love with
McCain and they are looking for a reason to quit him. The Times did not get this story from Hillary or Obama supporters they got it from McCain supporters who obviously are out to take him out.
Barack_America
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Wed Feb-20-08 08:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
This whole "scandal" is stinky. I just don't see much meat here and no reason to have run with it.
Debi
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Wed Feb-20-08 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
21. I'm sure as hell more interested in the fact that the woman was a tele-com
lobbyist than how 'close' the two had become. What is Mr. Clean Ethics doing spending private time with a person who could sway his votes w/regard to the tele-com industry? I hope the Democratic candidates know better than to jump on the 'affair' side of this issue....it's just not worth the effort. Beat the man fair.
book_worm
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Wed Feb-20-08 08:18 PM
Response to Original message
6. NY Times needs more to go on than this
both parties deny any affair. Unless there is something more to back this up it will be a non-issue within a few days and the NY Times may have to even issue an apology.
Peregrine Took
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Wed Feb-20-08 08:20 PM
Response to Reply #6
14. Jonathon Altar was right - without the woman coming forward or a photo
or some evidence - its a nowhere story. Why bother?
no name no slogan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Wed Feb-20-08 08:19 PM
Response to Original message
8. Pat's just jealous that he didn't get any action when he was a candidate
unless you count bitter old bass-ackward racist white guys as action, that is
Bluzmann57
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Wed Feb-20-08 08:19 PM
Response to Original message
9. "Bill Clinton had an affair!"
"How horrible!" See this is what angers me about this story. The media and the republicans tried their damndest to end his Presidency, including Buchanan. But now that McCain has allegedly had an affair, that's ok. Can't have it both ways.
PCIntern
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Wed Feb-20-08 08:20 PM
Response to Reply #9
goldcanyonaz
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Wed Feb-20-08 08:19 PM
Response to Original message
12. I say Fuck the MSM for destroying a life without any proof.
Barack_America
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Wed Feb-20-08 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #12
18. Exactly. Scandal for the sake of scandal benefits no one. n/t
NightWatcher
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Wed Feb-20-08 08:20 PM
Response to Original message
16. not just shithead, but former Nixon speechwriter, Pat B
SeattleGirl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Wed Feb-20-08 08:21 PM
Response to Original message
17. You didn't expect anything else from him, did you?
I just about gagged, though, when he said that the MSM shouldn't be reporting on it if there's nothing there. Bet he never said anything like that when Bill Clinton was President.
ecstatic
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Wed Feb-20-08 08:22 PM
Response to Original message
19. Yet he wanted to jump all over Michelle O for a quote
taken out of context?? What a disgusting hypocrite!
ronnykmarshall
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
Wed Feb-20-08 08:28 PM
Response to Original message
24. Speak to us Holy Joe!!! Speak to us!!!
You're fucking ass damned Bill Clinton for gettin' some trim on the side! Now your boy has a little problem with his own pecker!!! Come on Joe! Tell us!
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts)
Wed May 08th 2024, 01:08 AM
Response to Original message
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.