Kerry should point out that DEMOCRACY was the victor in

[LandOLincoln]

Spain, not the terrorists; that 90% of the Spanish population had been opposed to the invasion of Iraq in the first place, and that Aznar, like Blair, defied the expressed will of his people by joining BushCo in the Iraqi diversion from the real terrorists.

He could also point out that the Madrid bombings--like the many others around the world since 9/11--made it clear that BushCo's "War on Terra" is anything but.




edit for punctuation

[Goldmund]

1. YES.

I started a thread saying a similar thing:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=467309&mesg_id=467309

[elperromagico]

2. In fact, wasn't the US the only country in the "Coalition of the Willing"

where the majority of the people supported the Iraq war?

[Name removed]

3. Deleted message

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

[Goldmund]

4. He doesn't seem that strong to me.

Although weakening him is always a good idea, especially since all you have to do is speak the truth about his own actions.

[Name removed]

5. Deleted message

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

[BurtWorm]

6. He meant he voted for the version of the bill that was paid for through

rescinding some of the Bush tax cuts. He didn't vote for the one that was paid for with air. (I.e., the one that actually passed.)

[Name removed]

13. Deleted message

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

[BurtWorm]

15. If you make "barely enough as it is," you ought to know

that Kerry has no interest in raising your taxes. Welcome to DU. Enjoy it while you can. ;)

[Name removed]

16. Deleted message

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

[BurtWorm]

17. I meant it in the spirit of "carpe diem!"

;)

[rasputin1952]

12. Welcome to DU KerreydAway...

:hi: :toast:

:)

[Name removed]

14. Deleted message

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

[BurtWorm]

19. He got kerryed away, it seems.

;)

[jbfam4]

8. agree

Bush doesn't seem to be strong at all.....if he were, he could run on his record, but that is a disaster.....we are not better off than we were before he assumed the throne. He lied to the American people and the world. If he were so strong, he wouldn't have to keep defending his reasons for going into Iraq.....or should I say his many changing reasons.

[elperromagico]

9. Yes, but even in those countries

(Australia, Spain, and the United Kingdom for example), wide majorities opposed the US action in Iraq and their government's support for it.

[elperromagico]

10. To impeach Bush (and remove him from office) we would need to

A. Get a majority in the House,
B. Get at least a 75% majority in the Senate. We'd need at least that much, because some Democrats would vote against conviction (Zell Miller, for instance).

We couldn't get either until at least November, and it's unlikely even then. So our best hope is to get rid of him via the ballot.

[BurtWorm]

7. I totally agree. I wonder if we should start a campaign to get him to say

that. I will write him a letter urging him. I hope others on DU will do the same.

[goodhue]

11. hear, hear!

[gate of the sun]

18. yes he should. n/t