Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hillary's only hope: Vicious mudslinging

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
theboss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 12:39 AM
Original message
Hillary's only hope: Vicious mudslinging
Edited on Wed Feb-20-08 12:42 AM by theboss
From a purely political standpoint, Hillary can no longer win this on the "issues."

First of all, there is not enough difference between the candidates to really make up a lot of ground on an issues-oriented campaign. Secondly, you don't make up a lot of ground in general on "issues" unless you are pushing a really radical concept - a Jerry Brown flat tax type of issue (Remember '92? I do).

So, if I'm Hillary's campaign advisor, I take her in a dark room, put on my Death Eater's mask, and let her know her options. She can either get a little nasty and lose or get a narrow, ultimately useless win in Texas and Ohio.....or get really really really ugly and maybe get a bigger win that gives her some real traction.

I'd run an Obama's soft on drugs because Obama did drugs ad tomorrow in Cincinatti.

(PS I'm an Obama supporter. But I'm also an attorney. I'm trained to think for both sides).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ingac70 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 12:42 AM
Response to Original message
1. I think the mudslinging she has done so far...
has blown up in her face. But if she wants to step it up a notch, then I think she should knock herself out (of the race, through huge margin losses).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 12:44 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Wisconson, For Example
Obama snagged the vast bulk of late-deciders - Clinton's crap lost her a lot of votes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ericgtr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 12:46 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. Yeah that hasn't worked out too well for her yet
but I am sure we'll see more and I agree, she has absolutely nothing else to run on with any sort of legs. A lot of her supporters will assert that she does have some sound policies and I will agree to an extent but so far it hasn't given her any traction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theboss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 12:48 AM
Original message
There were weak silly attacks
She needs to get down and ugly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 12:50 AM
Response to Original message
12. like what?
down and ugly stands a very good chance of boomeranging on her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theboss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 12:52 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. She ain't gonna win being pretty
I don't know. I'd be tempted to play the "How do we know he's not a Muslim?" card.

The question she needs to ask herself, how bad do you want to win this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 12:54 AM
Response to Reply #15
19. I can't imagine a worse approach
The media would tear her apart in way that would make their treatment of her to date, look gentle. And SDs would flee. She's just not good at this stuff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theboss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 12:55 AM
Response to Reply #19
22. I'm not saying it's a great option
I think it's her only option.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 01:02 AM
Response to Reply #22
23. I think what you're saying is that she's run out of options
and I see her only hope as being shredding him in the debates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theboss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 01:07 AM
Response to Reply #23
27. I don't think enough people watch debates
The most disastrous debate performance in American history was Reagan's first debate with Mondale. And he won in a laugher.

As far as I can tell, the only debate that ever changed anything was 1960 and that was for reasons well beyond simply issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yupster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 01:24 AM
Response to Reply #27
28. And then there were Bush's debate performances
and it didn't seem to hurt him either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JeanGrey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 01:05 AM
Response to Reply #1
25. Yeah she needs to continue to sling mud.
That'll help! NOT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 12:43 AM
Response to Original message
2. She's not done yet, but that's okay. She won't win, and that's okay also. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HeraldSquare212 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 12:45 AM
Response to Original message
4. The superdelegates will abandon her if she does that.
My guess is she's already been warned quite explicitly, and the finance issue was pretty close to the line - validating the Rep nominee attack has to lose you a lot of friends on the Dem side.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 12:46 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. The big donors will also likely abandon her.
It's only a matter of time before Clinton's campaign runs out of gas...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HeraldSquare212 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 12:52 AM
Response to Reply #8
16. Right, and that's probably more important.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GarbagemanLB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 12:45 AM
Response to Original message
5. Every attack only strengthens Obama's message of change and draws clearer distinctions between them
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sjdnb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 12:45 AM
Response to Original message
6. Well, I'm glad your not my attorney because, I'd suggest
Hillary just keep putting out the truth -- the fact that she actually has concrete plans and policies, while Obama's are fluff sprinkled with fairy dust (rhetorical speeches).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 12:48 AM
Response to Original message
9. I think Obama should throw a bucket of shit at her tomorrow or Thursday
Edited on Wed Feb-20-08 12:50 AM by Bleachers7
Something to severely throw them off their game. Maybe it should be next week, but Obama should preemptively put them on the defensive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
faithfulcitizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 12:55 AM
Response to Reply #9
20. LMAO!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 12:49 AM
Response to Original message
10. Hillary will go negative further. She cannot sell herself. She's in a hole and gonna keep digging
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tularetom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 12:49 AM
Response to Original message
11. She sucks at the negative campaigning
and her campaign "organization" (a euphemism) is just as weak. Witness the big plagiarism scandal.

soft on drugs won't cut it for her either. She has to eat into Obama's huge lead among younger voters. Think they give a shit if Obama used drugs? Besides her and Bill's record on the use of drugs is a bit murky as well. I think Obama would be well within his rights to turn the question around on her and compare his forthrightness with what would undoubtedly be an evasive and focus group tested non answer from Hillary.

The Obama campaign is far more expert at deflecting these negative attacks than the Clintons expected and the Clinton's campaign is bumbling at best. I'm afraid she is in deep shit and the more crap she tries to fling the more will wind up on her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BringBigDogBack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 12:51 AM
Response to Original message
13. You got it./
Look for more garbage on the horizon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bread and Circus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 12:52 AM
Response to Original message
14. She has to control the news cycles. Her antics in the past few days...
did that. It may or may not have backfired for her.

But if she can continue to control the newscycles so the idiots parrot her points, then she can do some damage.

Camp Obama is fairly good at controlling the newscycles so lets see what they do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theboss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 12:54 AM
Response to Reply #14
18. Good point
The conversation needs to change from "10 in a row....10 in a row....10 in a row...."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 01:07 AM
Response to Reply #14
26. that`s why she ran out of wisconsin
and flew to the media center of the world today. she needs to control the media tomorrow morning to cover up her disaster in wisconsin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
faithfulcitizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 12:54 AM
Response to Original message
17. And she's had 35 years of "experience".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 12:55 AM
Response to Original message
21. I would advise her to hold on to her dignity, and bow out
Edited on Wed Feb-20-08 12:56 AM by SoCalDem
while there is still a shred of "legacy" left for the Clinton adminsitration.

They endured a brutal decade, and left office with high approval ratings. Those high approvals did not automatically mean that it was her "turn", or that we wanted another Clinton admin.. It just meant that we liked them,. and were pleased with the stewardship they provided us all.

If she wanted to be a senator, that was just fine with us..and BC kept the patina of excellence, and was on his way to even higher ratings as an ex-president..

and now...

they are in the process of throwing it all away and appearing to be petty and two-faced.

BC's approval from black people is all but thrown under the bus, and I'm not sure he can ever get that back..

Instead of pushing her on to the stage, he should have his hand on Obama's shoulder and out there being HIS champion.. That would be more believable (based on what he's told us all these years)..

Snide, quasi-racist comments from him , does her no good and it sure tarnishes his reputation..,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 01:04 AM
Response to Original message
24. going negative will not help anyone
but the cable news talking assholes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 04:02 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC