Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Dick Morris on the election

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Chef Donating Member (453 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-04 02:41 PM
Original message
Dick Morris on the election
I attended a conference Monday where Dick Morris was the lead off speaker. He made several predictable points about the election, key states where the election will be fought, etc. Of interest were his comments about other aspects of the race:

1. He didn’t think it would be a close election.
2. He thought Kerry could win it.
3. Thought Kerry should pick Clark, Richardson, or Clinton as his running mate. He preferred Clinton, but suggested that the Hispanic vote was so important that Richardson would be strong.
4. Bush has only one issue (terror and keeping us safe). Kerry has all the rest. If by election, safety is more important to voters, Bush wins.
5. However, Bush can not ignore Social Security, Medicare, education the economy or the environment or Kerry will widen the gap between him on these issues. Likewise, Kerry can’t give Bush a pass on defense, or the same will happen.
6. He also suggested that the Republican Party was dead as the dodo. It just hasn’t been reflected in their congressional majorities yet. The reason is that they are on the wrong side of all issues that are important to the vast majority of Americans and eventually this will become apparent to them, once the safety defense issue is put into perspective.

I am not convinced he really has any better idea about these issues than anyone else, but it was interesting to hear him speak.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AntiCoup2K4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-04 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. There's no way that Toe Sucker is favoring the Democrats
Think I'll read between the lines here and speculate that his #4 means he's got some advanced warning of the "October Surprise"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mikehiggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-18-04 08:52 AM
Response to Reply #1
19. Unless he figures the GOP is over, and is hoping to feather his
own nest. His main problem with the party has been his problem with the Clintons. A dem party headed by someone else might have room for someone like Morris, as unpalatable as he might be.

The kind of petty arrogance he was accused of is hardly rare among consultants, many of whom come to beleive their own press releases just as easily as do the candidates who they work for.

And I agree with him that when the GOP collapse comes, it will come fast and hard. This election may do it, and if not, 2006 certainly will.

You can't fool all of the people all of the time, and it is quite possible that time is up for the right wing. I think they will try to jettison Bush/Cheney if at all possible and leave it to the Dems to try and clean up the mess they leave behind. A spate of bi-partisanship may well be in the offing after January.

We'll see.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sidwill Donating Member (975 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-04 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
2. All I can say about about that is:


Dick Morris before he dicks you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
coloradodem2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-04 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
3. I would have thought that it would have been more pro-Republican.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trotsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-04 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. No kidding, so did I.
It surprised me to see him admit that Kerry has a good shot. He's been just brutal to virtually all Democrats lately. And for him to admit today's Republican party is out of touch, well, damn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chef Donating Member (453 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-04 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Morris
I was taken that he made several snide remarks about Bush. He was generally catty about everyone, but he came across as not having much use for GW.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boobooday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-04 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
4. I like the part about
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-04 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
5. um
isn't Dick Morris always wrong?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Goldmund Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-04 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
6. I hope Bush doesn't believe this:
"If by election, safety is more important to voters, Bush wins."

It's absurd if it's true. If the electorate were a little more informed and sentient, national security would be Bush's greatest weakness.

But if it is true (politically, of course) and the Bushies believe it, expect Red Alerts, and more "incompetence" in preventing attacks. And if it's true, attacks will be planned, Osama can't let his boy Dubya lose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chef Donating Member (453 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-04 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Safety
Someone mentioned this to him. He just smiled and asked "Who controls the alert anouncements?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ulysses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-04 02:49 PM
Response to Original message
9. ulysses on Dick Morris


With friends like this...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeattleRob Donating Member (893 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-18-04 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #9
21. Thanks Ulysses!
Your photo says it all. Why the hell does anyone give any consideration to anything that comes out of that toe sucking, repuke's mouth?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MidwestTransplant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-04 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
11. This concerns me
because he is always wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stuart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-04 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
12. He's clued into a different reality
He's a weasel for sure, but he is a player. He sees, hears and processes things from a much different perspective.

For someone in his position, he only has one outlook, that is: What does it take to win? He is a pro, most of us are amatuers, we don't have his connections. Plus he has the greatest motivator advising him; greed. He is only looking out for himself.

He has worked with Democrats in the past, and very well may in the future.

I called him a weasel, however a more apt analogy would be a rat, they are always the first to jump off a sinking ship.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-04 02:59 PM
Response to Original message
13. Didn't he just say last month that Bush would win? I thought I saw that
posted and flamed here on DU! What's he smoking? He's suddenly seen a turn in the tide? And, that he thinks Clinton would make a VP choice for Kerry? I would think that would be a real "ego" problem. No one would see Kerry as the candidate if Clinton was his VP and it would bring up all the old dirt out there. :eyes:

Thanks for the upbeat post, however. One always has to wonder which side Morris is playing and it's usually for himself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lancdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-04 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. I don't think Clinton as VP makes sense either
BTW, perhaps Morris is different when he's not on Fox or writing for the N.Y. Post. It sounds that way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chef Donating Member (453 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-04 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Senator Clinton
His opinion was that the Clintons still control the party and that if Kerry does not pick her, they won't be pleased. Also, if wins without her and is reelected, she most likely will never get a shot at the presidency.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Piperay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-04 08:33 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. Picking Senator Clinton as VP would
guarantee another 4 years of chimp and his regime, Hillary Clinton is to divisive and would bring out the RW as never before. :argh:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leilani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-04 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
16. Depending on who is paying him
that's what his "analysis" is.

The guy has NO core beliefs.

He was working for Trent Lott, at the same time as working for Clinton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fujiyama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-04 08:49 PM
Response to Original message
18. ...
Edited on Wed Mar-17-04 08:52 PM by fujiyama
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
THUNDER HANDS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-18-04 09:08 AM
Response to Original message
20. Dick Morris CANNOT be trusted
My poly sci professor wrote a book with him, did all the research for it, basically did everything.

Morris slapped his name on the book and didn't even credit her at all. Not even a thank you or acknowledgement.

He's scum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 07:26 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC