|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
aquarius dawning (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-18-08 02:52 PM Original message |
Poll question: If Hillary won the primary election by disenfranchising states that voted for Obama, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
La Lioness Priyanka (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-18-08 02:53 PM Response to Original message |
1. ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mohc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-18-08 02:56 PM Response to Original message |
2. If Clinton herself |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aquarius dawning (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-18-08 02:59 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. Obama and his supporters are, in fact, fighting to keep votes for Hillary from counting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mohc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-18-08 03:06 PM Response to Reply #4 |
6. That would be like |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aquarius dawning (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-18-08 03:15 PM Response to Reply #6 |
11. being party to disenfranchisement is the same thing as disenfranchising |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MercutioATC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-18-08 03:08 PM Response to Reply #4 |
7. Actually, it's the Party that made that decision and is standing by it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aquarius dawning (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-18-08 03:23 PM Response to Reply #7 |
15. IIRC, only two candidates opted to endorse the disenfranchisement of Michigan voters |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MercutioATC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-18-08 03:28 PM Response to Reply #15 |
17. Actually, ALL of the candidates agreed to abide by the DNC decision. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aquarius dawning (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-18-08 03:39 PM Response to Reply #17 |
18. but only two of them went so far as to actively take their names off of the ballot |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MercutioATC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-18-08 03:47 PM Response to Reply #18 |
22. You're admitting that HRC opted to endorse the disenfranchisement of Michigan voters, then? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JorgeTheGood (736 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-18-08 03:05 PM Response to Reply #2 |
5. Ya mean like NC ? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mohc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-18-08 03:08 PM Response to Reply #5 |
8. Huh? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
billyoc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-18-08 02:58 PM Response to Original message |
3. Forget about it 5 minutes later and vote Democratic. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bunnies (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-18-08 03:09 PM Response to Original message |
9. Im all for rioting. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
George_Bonanza (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-18-08 03:09 PM Response to Original message |
10. If those states' primaries/caucuses were held under confusing circumstances, then YES! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jsamuel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-18-08 03:17 PM Response to Reply #10 |
12. IO? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Benhurst (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-18-08 03:21 PM Response to Original message |
13. Why there would be even more outrage than there was over |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Spider Jerusalem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-18-08 03:22 PM Response to Original message |
14. This is a worthless question. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aquarius dawning (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-18-08 03:26 PM Response to Reply #14 |
16. It's only worthless to the people who stand to benefit from it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Spider Jerusalem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-18-08 03:39 PM Response to Reply #16 |
19. Political parties are legally allowed to set the rules for party participation in primary elections. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mohc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-18-08 03:40 PM Response to Reply #16 |
20. Thats just your reading though |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
XemaSab (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-18-08 03:41 PM Response to Original message |
21. Obama isn't disenfranchising the states |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu May 02nd 2024, 02:46 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC