|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
CorpGovActivist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 04:03 PM Original message |
Poll question: Who would you rather your daughter grow up to be like, if you were running for President? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LaurenG (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 04:05 PM Response to Original message |
1. It would have to be Cate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hepburn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 04:06 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. Totally agree.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CorpGovActivist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 04:18 PM Response to Reply #1 |
13. Cate gets my vote, no contest; she honors and respects her upbringing by speaking her mind... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dcindian (881 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 04:06 PM Response to Original message |
2. I will take my two daughters just as they are. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CorpGovActivist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 04:16 PM Response to Reply #2 |
12. Well said. Which do you think they're most likely to relate to, though? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maddy McCall (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 04:07 PM Response to Original message |
4. The war of the daughters, created by a DU poster. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CorpGovActivist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 04:09 PM Response to Reply #4 |
5. Ms. Clinton and Ms. Edwards both have public speeches to benchmark now... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eurobabe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 04:09 PM Response to Original message |
6. Both girls are very poised and intelligent |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CorpGovActivist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 04:12 PM Response to Reply #6 |
8. Cate gets mine, no contest. I think Chelsea is really showing herself on the trail... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hisownpetard (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 04:12 PM Response to Original message |
7. This is just wrong, on many levels. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CorpGovActivist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 04:14 PM Response to Reply #7 |
10. They're adults, and campaign surrogates. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KoKo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-17-08 10:44 AM Response to Reply #7 |
166. Agree....both are fine young women and to do a poll trying to make a difference |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CorpGovActivist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-17-08 10:47 AM Response to Reply #166 |
167. Chelsea drew the distinction and the difference this week... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wellstone dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 04:13 PM Response to Original message |
9. As I've told my own daughter |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CorpGovActivist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 04:15 PM Response to Reply #9 |
11. I'd love to hear the stock reply you get. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Support the ACLU (65 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 04:19 PM Response to Original message |
14. Why not Amy Carter? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CorpGovActivist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 04:29 PM Response to Reply #14 |
16. Um. Confined to candidates who ran in 2008, with prominent adult children as surrogates. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jane Austin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 04:20 PM Response to Original message |
15. Michelle Obama. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CorpGovActivist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 05:32 PM Response to Reply #15 |
24. She's the candidate's spouse, but yeah - I think her parents deserve to be proud! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jane Austin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 05:34 PM Response to Reply #24 |
25. I read the question as "Who would you want your daughter to grow up like!" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CorpGovActivist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 05:35 PM Response to Reply #25 |
27. LIKE, LIKE |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rug (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 04:31 PM Response to Original message |
17. ? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CorpGovActivist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 06:14 PM Response to Reply #17 |
33. ?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rug (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 06:50 PM Response to Reply #33 |
49. Tell me how your daughter turns out. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CorpGovActivist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 07:28 PM Response to Reply #49 |
60. Capable of articulating her own viewpoint, and capable of laying out ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rug (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 07:32 PM Response to Reply #60 |
63. Then I guess you're clairvoyant. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CorpGovActivist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 07:39 PM Response to Reply #63 |
67. No, I have a pretty good roadmap for how to raise individualistic... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rug (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 07:43 PM Response to Reply #67 |
72. Living humans are hard to keep on a roadmap. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CorpGovActivist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 07:47 PM Response to Reply #72 |
75. But children, raised well and with love, have a better than decent shot ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 04:32 PM Response to Original message |
18. I'd rather my daughters both be themselves than be in the mold of a daughter in a campaign. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CorpGovActivist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 04:38 PM Response to Reply #18 |
19. Well said. But which adult surrogate listed in the poll best reflects... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 04:43 PM Response to Reply #19 |
20. I think it's a cheap, mean spirited poll and I'm not playing. I want my daughters to be themselves |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CorpGovActivist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 05:26 PM Response to Reply #20 |
21. I think Chelsea is a cheap, mean-spirited surrogate. I'm not playing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maddy McCall (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 05:30 PM Response to Reply #21 |
22. You're disgusting. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CorpGovActivist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 05:31 PM Response to Reply #22 |
23. I get snippy, I'm disgusting? Chelsea gets snippy with questioners, as an official surrogate... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 06:25 PM Response to Reply #21 |
34. I'm sure you do. That's why I'm not playing your mean little game of pitting two young democratic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CorpGovActivist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 08:30 PM Response to Reply #34 |
107. And both have publicly demonstrated their independent stances from their... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
incapsulated (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 06:26 PM Response to Reply #21 |
35. Your hate knows no bounds does it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CorpGovActivist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 06:39 PM Response to Reply #35 |
42. I admire Cate and Elizabeth Edwards for strongly and publicly saying that John wasn't far enough ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
QC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 07:42 PM Response to Reply #42 |
70. Has Obama stood up for your relationship? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CorpGovActivist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 08:07 PM Response to Reply #70 |
94. I see someone open-minded enough to change his views on this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
11 Bravo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-17-08 11:30 AM Response to Reply #42 |
185. If St. Barack could spare him for a couple of minutes, I'm sure Donnie McClurkin could "cure" you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CorpGovActivist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-17-08 11:32 AM Response to Reply #185 |
186. I'm capable of weighing the totality of each candidate's record and positions... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Straight Shooter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 05:35 PM Response to Original message |
26. Let me guess: Likely that Hillary supporters will choose Chelsea; others will choose Cate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CorpGovActivist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 05:37 PM Response to Reply #26 |
29. Hey, I'm hearing some Clinton supporter friends saying that Chelsea is less than useless... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Straight Shooter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 06:42 PM Response to Reply #29 |
44. Well, they are your friends, aren't they? And I doubt you discourage their opinion. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CorpGovActivist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 08:21 PM Response to Reply #44 |
104. Well, as usual, I'm sure Mark Penn has the internal polling figures... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 06:27 PM Response to Reply #26 |
36. I'm not choosing either. They're both dedicated Democrats. Nothing wrong with either |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Straight Shooter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 06:57 PM Response to Reply #36 |
53. I'm just saying those that do participate in choosing one, which I did not. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
incapsulated (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 05:37 PM Response to Original message |
28. I'm not voting for their daughters |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CorpGovActivist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 05:39 PM Response to Reply #28 |
30. I think their respective daughters' attitudes and statements reflect on the candidates... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LeftishBrit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 05:49 PM Response to Reply #30 |
31. Well, Patti Davis and Ron Reagan Jr. turned out pretty reasonable DESPITE their parents |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CorpGovActivist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 05:51 PM Response to Reply #31 |
32. True, but I think - ceteris parabus - the kids are a decent inferential reflection... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigbrother05 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 09:00 PM Response to Reply #31 |
117. That makes them a 50-50 split |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CorpGovActivist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 10:52 PM Response to Reply #117 |
151. I sincerely and deeply admired Cate Edwards' ability to firmly, yet graciously... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 06:30 PM Response to Reply #30 |
38. Like Al Gore's son's legal troubles? What a sad sham you've revealed yourself to be. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CorpGovActivist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 06:45 PM Response to Reply #38 |
47. Al Gore isn't running. Comparing Cate's willingness to disagree publicly with her father... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 06:49 PM Response to Reply #47 |
48. If you think the kids are a reflection of the parents - as you've stated - then |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CorpGovActivist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 06:51 PM Response to Reply #48 |
50. Mark Penn? Is that you? Didn't you get it all out of your system in 2001? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 07:03 PM Response to Reply #50 |
54. I'm not criticizing Gore. I love Al Gore. But unlike you I don't consider his son a reflection |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CorpGovActivist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 07:20 PM Response to Reply #54 |
57. In the final analysis of that incident... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 07:21 PM Response to Reply #57 |
58. I think you're a very sad caricature. Both young women are intelligent, decent people |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CorpGovActivist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 07:42 PM Response to Reply #58 |
69. But have both disagreed publicly with their parent's policy stance on an issues? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 10:03 PM Response to Reply #69 |
128. I don't care if they have or not. I have no reason to demonize either of them. I'm glad to have |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CorpGovActivist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 10:14 PM Response to Reply #128 |
132. I'm not demonizing; I'm criticizing, and gauging others' perceptions... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 10:15 PM Response to Reply #132 |
134. Bullshit. This was a nasty poll intended only to be divisive and to criticize a Democrat. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CorpGovActivist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 10:17 PM Response to Reply #134 |
135. You've expressed an opinion on that score... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 10:18 PM Response to Reply #135 |
136. Adios. You can take your road without me. NT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlCzervik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 07:43 PM Response to Reply #58 |
71. nicely said Joe. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hippo_Tron (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 06:28 PM Response to Original message |
37. Elizabeth Edwards |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CorpGovActivist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 08:19 PM Response to Reply #37 |
102. Yeah, I am a huge fan of Elizabeth Edwards myself. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MagsDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 06:30 PM Response to Original message |
39. They are both great |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CorpGovActivist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 08:18 PM Response to Reply #39 |
101. I don't recall Cate giving a snippy answer to a questioner about her dad's IWR vote... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
donheld (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 06:35 PM Response to Original message |
40. Either one. They are both very admirable girls |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CorpGovActivist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 08:16 PM Response to Reply #40 |
99. Well, I just think that Cate treated questioners with more respect... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NastyRiffraff (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 06:37 PM Response to Original message |
41. I didn't vote, because I really like both of them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 06:40 PM Response to Reply #41 |
43. As the father of two daughters, the whole poll reminded me of "which of your daugthers do you like |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pbca (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 06:42 PM Response to Original message |
45. I hope my daughters |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CorpGovActivist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 08:14 PM Response to Reply #45 |
97. Good advice. But as a parent, which model would you rather see... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
B2G (714 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 06:43 PM Response to Original message |
46. Cate by a mile n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CorpGovActivist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 08:00 PM Response to Reply #46 |
90. . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MethuenProgressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 06:54 PM Response to Original message |
51. This thread brought to you by HateHillAtAllCosts Inc. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
theHandpuppet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 07:03 PM Response to Reply #51 |
55. Yep. Surprise, surprise. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CorpGovActivist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 07:58 PM Response to Reply #55 |
87. Senator Clinton has apparently persuaded Chelsea that her IWR vote... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CorpGovActivist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 07:22 PM Response to Reply #51 |
59. No, brought to you by, "I defected from Hill because of her poor policy stances." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlCzervik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 07:33 PM Response to Reply #59 |
64. can you manage to at least leave her daughter out of it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CorpGovActivist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 07:45 PM Response to Reply #64 |
73. Sure, when her daughter stops making trips on campaign coin, as a surrogate... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlCzervik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 07:49 PM Response to Reply #73 |
76. We already know you hate Clinton, thats fine but really, enough is enough. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CorpGovActivist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 07:56 PM Response to Reply #76 |
84. You're right: I defected from the Clinton Camp, because of her policy stances. Enough Clintons. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Straight Shooter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 10:10 PM Response to Reply #84 |
129. You were never for Hillary Clinton. You were an Edwards supporter. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CorpGovActivist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 10:15 PM Response to Reply #129 |
133. Actually, I took on an Edwards supporter or two in defense of HRC in the early fall... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Straight Shooter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 10:59 PM Response to Reply #133 |
155. One or two defenses does not put you in the "Hillary camp," and you know it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CorpGovActivist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 11:10 PM Response to Reply #155 |
157. Well, my history of support for her is there, and my support was hers to lose. She lost it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bunnies (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 06:56 PM Response to Original message |
52. Obama. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 07:16 PM Response to Original message |
56. Cate Edwards for sure |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CorpGovActivist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 07:53 PM Response to Reply #56 |
80. Yeah, I was frankly surprised that they trotted her out. Desperate, it seems to me. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 07:31 PM Response to Original message |
61. Ughhhhh. So Now The Ridiculously Petty Bickering Has Gotten To This Level? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CorpGovActivist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 07:34 PM Response to Reply #61 |
65. When an adult child of a candidate - acting as a surrogate, on campaign's coin - disses a ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 07:39 PM Response to Reply #65 |
66. Oh Get A Grip. Seriously. My God. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CorpGovActivist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 07:46 PM Response to Reply #66 |
74. So, you think Chelsea gave a good answer in Wisconsin? If you think her answer is not... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 07:53 PM Response to Reply #74 |
79. This Isn't About That. It's About The Amazingly Petty & Melodramatic Degrees You Took It In Your OP |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CorpGovActivist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 07:54 PM Response to Reply #79 |
82. Yup. The OP is just frothing mad. A simple question, and a poll. Wow. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 10:12 PM Response to Reply #79 |
130. Deleted message |
CorpGovActivist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 10:19 PM Response to Reply #130 |
137. If you'd care to discuss Ms. Clinton's remarks on the IWR vote, that's fine... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 10:22 PM Response to Reply #137 |
138. Funny, your thread was about dividing and demonizing Democrats. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CorpGovActivist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 10:25 PM Response to Reply #138 |
139. Um, it was sparked by how Ms. Clinton treated the Wisconsin questioner... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 10:26 PM Response to Reply #139 |
140. I know exactly what prompted it: your hate and willingness to divide. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CorpGovActivist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 10:27 PM Response to Reply #140 |
141. OK. Seriously. You can't hang on facts, so you attack personally. Nice. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 10:28 PM Response to Reply #141 |
142. Your entire thread is an attack. Goodnight to you, and good lucj in your little hate tunnel. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CorpGovActivist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 10:31 PM Response to Reply #142 |
144. If you wake up in a facty mood tomorrow, do come back. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlCzervik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 07:32 PM Response to Original message |
62. this is a really awful poll. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CorpGovActivist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 07:52 PM Response to Reply #62 |
78. As bad as the answer Chelsea gave on her mom's lack of clairvoyance? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlCzervik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 07:57 PM Response to Reply #78 |
86. she's not the enemy and i'm all done here, you have 0 class. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CorpGovActivist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 07:59 PM Response to Reply #86 |
88. An apology for the IWR vote would show class. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
silverweb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 07:41 PM Response to Original message |
68. Herself. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CorpGovActivist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 07:52 PM Response to Reply #68 |
77. OK. Would you want her to be able to frame a critique of your position? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
silverweb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 09:25 PM Response to Reply #77 |
119. That's an irrelevant question. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CorpGovActivist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 09:31 PM Response to Reply #119 |
120. Exactly my problem with the phenom we've seen this past week. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
silverweb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 10:13 PM Response to Reply #120 |
131. I haven't been paying attention to the phenom. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
QC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 07:54 PM Response to Original message |
81. I would want my child to be the sort of person who |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CorpGovActivist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 07:55 PM Response to Reply #81 |
83. They're adult surrogates. Don't buy into the double standard. Either they're... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LWolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 07:57 PM Response to Original message |
85. Neither. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CorpGovActivist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 07:59 PM Response to Reply #85 |
89. Nicely said. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NMMNG (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 08:01 PM Response to Original message |
91. Have you sought therapy for your issue with HRC? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 08:02 PM Response to Reply #91 |
92. Deleted sub-thread |
CorpGovActivist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 08:03 PM Response to Reply #91 |
93. Well, I hear it did wonders for her marriage, which she deems superior to mine. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NMMNG (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 08:15 PM Response to Reply #93 |
98. What does your candidate have to say about your marriage? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CorpGovActivist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 08:17 PM Response to Reply #98 |
100. Go to Visible Vote's online forum videos to see n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NMMNG (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 08:20 PM Response to Reply #100 |
103. "I believe marriage is between a man and a woman" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CorpGovActivist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 08:25 PM Response to Reply #103 |
105. I've seen HRC's, too. Of the top three, I was rooting for Edwards. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NMMNG (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 08:30 PM Response to Reply #105 |
106. I was rooting for Kucinich, then for Edwards. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CorpGovActivist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 08:33 PM Response to Reply #106 |
108. But HRC is? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NMMNG (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 08:37 PM Response to Reply #108 |
110. More than he is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CorpGovActivist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 08:41 PM Response to Reply #110 |
112. Sorry. I have a political memory that extends back far enough... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NMMNG (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 08:46 PM Response to Reply #112 |
114. I remember that too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CorpGovActivist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 08:51 PM Response to Reply #114 |
115. What's the Clinton Excuse then? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NMMNG (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 08:57 PM Response to Reply #115 |
116. Her excuse for what? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CorpGovActivist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 09:16 PM Response to Reply #116 |
118. Her cowardice on LGBT issues...no leader is she. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NMMNG (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 09:42 PM Response to Reply #118 |
121. Misandry. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CorpGovActivist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 09:44 PM Response to Reply #121 |
123. You've offered nary a fact in support of her leadership on LGBT issues. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JohnLocke (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 08:12 PM Response to Original message |
95. Cate, of course. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CorpGovActivist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 08:13 PM Response to Reply #95 |
96. . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CorpGovActivist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 08:35 PM Response to Original message |
109. *******I think this demonstrates Cate would be a better ticket-helping surrogate in the fall****** |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZBlue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 08:39 PM Response to Original message |
111. The finest thing any parent can give their child is self-confidence and intelligence. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CorpGovActivist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 08:42 PM Response to Reply #111 |
113. Beautifully said... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ErnestoG (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 09:42 PM Response to Original message |
122. Bella Abzug. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CorpGovActivist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 09:45 PM Response to Reply #122 |
124. Strong, opinionated, acts in accordance with her principles... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ErnestoG (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 10:53 PM Response to Reply #124 |
152. Yeah. And Bella never would have voted for the IWR. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CorpGovActivist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 10:54 PM Response to Reply #152 |
153. Ah, well. She should prepare now to be called a misogynist, for daring... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Samantha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 09:47 PM Response to Original message |
125. Caroline Kennedy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CorpGovActivist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 09:50 PM Response to Reply #125 |
127. I second that. As an "Other" vote, that's a darn good one. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
varelse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 09:48 PM Response to Original message |
126. If I ever have a daughter |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CorpGovActivist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-17-08 10:18 AM Response to Reply #126 |
159. Well said. But would you rather she be able and willing... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
varelse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-17-08 07:53 PM Response to Reply #159 |
201. Well I get the feeling she'd inherit at least a few tendencies from me and her putative father, sooo |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jillan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 10:28 PM Response to Original message |
143. Neither - my daughters are great just the way they are. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CorpGovActivist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 10:41 PM Response to Reply #143 |
145. Nice! But do they disagree with you on policies? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jillan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 10:52 PM Response to Reply #145 |
150. Not really so much on policies, but on what time to be home on a Saturday nite - that's where the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CorpGovActivist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 10:56 PM Response to Reply #150 |
154. You might have a budding lawyer on your hands, if you find yourself... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigwillq (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 10:41 PM Response to Original message |
146. Both are wonderful human beings |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CorpGovActivist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 10:42 PM Response to Reply #146 |
147. But as adult campaign surrogates... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigwillq (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 10:45 PM Response to Reply #147 |
148. That wasn't the initial question |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CorpGovActivist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 10:48 PM Response to Reply #148 |
149. "to disagree with me, publicly, on policy issues" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jlake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 11:00 PM Response to Original message |
156. I would be thrilled with either - and to rank them is petty. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CorpGovActivist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-16-08 11:12 PM Response to Reply #156 |
158. To treat the IWR questioner as Ms. Clinton did was petty. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigtree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-17-08 10:20 AM Response to Reply #158 |
160. But, this poll is your invention. It reflects on YOU, not anyone else. Petty and divisive. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CorpGovActivist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-17-08 10:24 AM Response to Reply #160 |
161. Yes, it reflects that the other voters who chose Cate over Chelsea are paying attention... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigtree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-17-08 10:29 AM Response to Reply #161 |
163. A disgusting, tabloid display. Dividing party members is your game here. These women are your pawns. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CorpGovActivist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-17-08 10:31 AM Response to Reply #163 |
165. No. I have family serving in Iraq. Again. Because Clinton put her political expedience... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigtree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-17-08 10:55 AM Response to Reply #165 |
173. Oh, you're on a vendetta. And, you're using these women as pawns in your vengeance play |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CorpGovActivist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-17-08 11:04 AM Response to Reply #173 |
174. I'm opposing a candidate I believe to be unfit to be C-i-C, unfit to sit in the Oval... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigtree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-17-08 11:10 AM Response to Reply #174 |
177. as long as it's really a 'fair' share . . . but, we digress, sir |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CorpGovActivist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-17-08 11:16 AM Response to Reply #177 |
178. "extremely classless" to put them on the stump... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigtree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-17-08 12:16 PM Response to Reply #178 |
191. these folks are not in politics. Neither are many of the other supporters who get bashed here daily |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CorpGovActivist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-17-08 12:17 PM Response to Reply #191 |
192. You dispute that Chelsea is acting in an official capacity? Move those goalposts. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rucky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-17-08 10:26 AM Response to Original message |
162. Cate for the reason you allude to. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CorpGovActivist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-17-08 10:29 AM Response to Reply #162 |
164. Karena was one year behind me at college. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Guava Jelly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-17-08 10:48 AM Response to Original message |
168. I would want her to be herself |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Evergreen Emerald (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-17-08 10:50 AM Response to Original message |
169. This is really very ugly. Chelsea has been supporting her mother |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CorpGovActivist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-17-08 10:52 AM Response to Reply #169 |
170. When Chelsea looks a maimed military family in the eye... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Evergreen Emerald (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-17-08 10:54 AM Response to Reply #170 |
172. Look. ITS NOT CLINTON'S FAULT. Your stupid answer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CorpGovActivist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-17-08 11:05 AM Response to Reply #172 |
175. Fine. You're disgusted. In a misplaced way. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Evergreen Emerald (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-17-08 11:23 AM Response to Reply #175 |
181. where is your disgust for Obama's? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CorpGovActivist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-17-08 11:24 AM Response to Reply #181 |
182. Thanks for that update. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
noamnety (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-17-08 10:54 AM Response to Original message |
171. Other - awful poll. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CorpGovActivist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-17-08 11:07 AM Response to Reply #171 |
176. I think everyone who's voted understands they're voting on the adult surrogating skills... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
noamnety (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-17-08 11:19 AM Response to Reply #176 |
179. It seemed you needed clarification of why this poll is offending people. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CorpGovActivist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-17-08 11:23 AM Response to Reply #179 |
180. I am offended by much of what I read here. The difference? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
noamnety (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-17-08 11:39 AM Response to Reply #180 |
187. Listen, or don't listen. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CorpGovActivist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-17-08 11:40 AM Response to Reply #187 |
188. The poll result speaks more clearly than the idle chidings... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
noamnety (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-17-08 12:10 PM Response to Reply #188 |
189. At least in Michigan they gave us an uncommitted option. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CorpGovActivist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-17-08 12:13 PM Response to Reply #189 |
190. Your three random polls... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CorpGovActivist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-17-08 12:20 PM Response to Reply #190 |
193. Case in point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
noamnety (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-17-08 12:33 PM Response to Reply #190 |
194. You can check the polls on the front pages as well as I can. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CorpGovActivist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-17-08 12:45 PM Response to Reply #194 |
195. Ratios matter less and less, the more votes and responses there are... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Honeycombe8 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-17-08 11:24 AM Response to Original message |
183. Who is Cate Edwards? (I guess that says it all, doesn't it?) nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CorpGovActivist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-17-08 11:26 AM Response to Reply #183 |
184. I guess it does: you're a woefully misinformed voter? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-17-08 12:47 PM Response to Original message |
196. Another divisive poll---Shame on you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CorpGovActivist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-17-08 12:48 PM Response to Reply #196 |
197. But kudos for Chelsea, for her wonder-inspiring answer to the Wisconsin questioner? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cloud75 (737 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-17-08 12:52 PM Response to Original message |
198. who is cate??? ah it doesn't matter anyone but a clinton |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CorpGovActivist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-17-08 01:05 PM Response to Reply #198 |
199. Assuming you're being tongue-in-cheek... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CorpGovActivist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-17-08 02:19 PM Response to Original message |
200. At 125 votes, 70/30 split. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 04th 2024, 11:16 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC