Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

But Which Democrat Can Win It All in November

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 12:04 PM
Original message
But Which Democrat Can Win It All in November
WSJ: But Which Democrat Can
Win It All in November?
By CHRISTOPHER COOPER
February 13, 2008; Page A8

....Right now, Mr. Obama has the stronger argument: In nine polls in the past two months that are posted by RealClearPolitics.com, the Illinois senator tops Mr. McCain in eight of them, with several of the most recent showing him winning by more than the survey's margin of error. Mrs. Clinton, by contrast, loses seven of the nine head-to-head contests, but only slightly. But polls have proven volatile this political season, and at this point neither Democrat is close to a lock for a theoretical November victory. Both candidates display weaknesses that could hinder their electability.

The Clinton campaign harps on Mr. Obama's lack of big-time political experience -- a knock that the Republican National Committee has already begun making. This week on its Web site, the RNC issued a series of Valentine's cards, one of which lampooned Mr. Obama's Washington resume. "Three years in the U.S. Senate qualifies me to wish you happy Valentine's Day," the card says.

"I think the first thing that we've seen time and time again is that the GOP attack machine redefines the Democratic candidate. Hillary has withstood this process," Mark Penn, a senior Clinton adviser, told reporters this week. But by touching on Mrs. Clinton's Washington experience, Mr. Penn also flags what could be one of her weaknesses in a general election contest: her past as an outspoken and hands-on first lady, joined at the hip with her husband, who was impeached by a Republican Congress....

***

...in a recent debate, Mr. Obama said he believed he had one edge: the Iraq war. Mrs. Clinton initially supported it, Mr. McCain has consistently supported it, and Mr. Obama has consistently opposed it.

The question of who is more electable in November isn't just being mulled by voters and the front-runners. An aide to John Edwards, who recently dropped out of the Democratic race, said the former North Carolina senator is torn over whether to endorse a politician he considers intimately tied to a dysfunctional political system, or to take a chance on a relative newcomer who may not have the toughness or the experience to go up against special interests in Washington. Mike Huckabee, who runs a distant second to Mr. McCain for the Republican nomination, told reporters yesterday that while he admires Mrs. Clinton's grasp of policy issues, he thinks Mr. Obama has an advantage, adding that the Illinois senator "has energized an enormous level of the electorate" -- and not just Democrats.

Mr. Obama continues to show an inability to win many of the big states that in the November election will be winner-take-all. Although Mr. Obama easily won his home state of Illinois, Mrs. Clinton beat him handily in California and New Jersey -- two states where campaign organization and name recognition were key to victory. Mrs. Clinton also won a straw contest in Florida and is favored to win in Ohio and Pennsylvania -- states that have been crucial to presidential victory. Mrs. Clinton has said she considers this a strong demonstration of her ability to appeal to a broad swath of the U.S. electorate....

http://online.wsj.com/public/article_print/SB120286352504863905.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tularetom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 12:09 PM
Original message
I think the WSJ has decided McCain is a loser and they'd rather have
Hillary elected president than Obama. They know the Dems will take the presidency and they are opting for what to them would be the lesser of two evils.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tularetom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. oops puter had a cpu fart
Edited on Wed Feb-13-08 12:10 PM by tularetom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC