Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why would Hillary turn to Reid and Pelosi to ask Obama to step down?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 11:35 AM
Original message
Why would Hillary turn to Reid and Pelosi to ask Obama to step down?
I posted this question about Hillary, Reid, and Pelosi as sort of an afterthought in another post last night. I am getting no answers there.

This morning that question bothers me more. I see the same hands playing politics this time. The cult meme is hitting hard. That is a tactic used by insiders to keep outsiders out and in their place. We were called cultists in 2004 when we supported Howard Dean. DU was one of the originators when another candidate entered the race...and it quickly spread throughout the media. The DLC called us "fringe activists.

Cult? Fringe? Both are about the same. It was dead wrong then and worse now. I think this campaign between two mostly moderate Democrats, neither of them anymore so-called "liberal" than Howard Dean was, is going to divide....trouble is I am not sure which way.

SO, I will ask the question again. Why, if true, would Hillary go to Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi to have them get Obama to step down? Pelosi is the convention chair. Can you say neutral? This leaves out the committee of the party that is responsible. Would she really go over the head of the DNC?

I have seen this only in the Telegraph.

Hillary campaign planning to enlist Dem leaders in her battle

The Clinton camp hopes to stop the Obama bandwagon by winning Texas and Ohio primaries on March 4, after which Mrs Clinton is planning to call on party grandees including Nancy Pelosi, Speaker of the House of Representatives and Harry Reid, the party's leader in the Senate, to persuade Mr Obama to stand down.


Spin or not?

We know which side Pelosi is on. She has made herself clear that she thinks Florida is not to be blamed at all....that the delegates will be seated. Doesn't sound neutral to me at all.

Pelosi says it is not Florida's fault at all

..."Pelosi also said the imbroglio over the primary isn’t the fault of Florida Democrats, who are the ones being sanctioned.

“Let’s be clear about what happened in Florida. The Republican legislature changed the date of the election there and also put a tax issue on the ballot that the Democrats just could not walk away from,” she said. “It wasn’t Florida Democrats who said they wanted to push earlier.”


She has been proved to be wrong..Florida Dems voted for it 115 to 1.

Florida is ready to help in this scenario.

State Dems to appoint delegates, hoping Florida will be counted

Local Democratic party leaders, confident the results of the Jan. 29 primary will be counted and the state's 210 delegates will be seated at the national convention, are going ahead with plans to appoint Florida's delegates to select a presidential candidate.

The district caucuses to select delegates from across the state remain on schedule for March 1, they said Monday.

"We still have time in front of us," said Celeste Bush, the Democratic Party leader in St. Lucie County. "I do believe we will be seated without a bunch of hoo-ha."


That would be this Celeste Bush. She was one of the DEC chairs who did a large amount of emailing to stop donations to the DNC.

Again my question...why would Hillary appeal to Reid and Pelosi? Is the Telegraph spinning? That might lead to the question of who is really the final authority on this issue. Hmmm...mmm. Is it really coming down to that? Is everybody in charge of everything now? Reid and Pelosi in charge of deciding who to ask to step down?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Yael Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
1. I'm surprised she has't enlisted the help of the kitchen sink
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
2. I'd like to know the answer to your question. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #2
11. Answer: They won't.
Publicly, at least.

The delegate leader, whichever one, will be the nominee, imo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. I hope you're right. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Oh, I meant to clarify...
The delegate count minus Sdelegates, though they probably won't turn the tide anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LakeSamish706 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
3. Once again it just goes to show that Clinton will do anything, anything at all...
to win this election. Don't know about how others feel, but this really is just more of what we already have.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
monmouth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
4. I think Ms. Hillary is due for a rude awakening. He's going to sweep
the races today. She should be thinking of her own concession speech. I'm really starting to get very sick of the "Clinton Machine." Their oil is running low and they're starting to make very unpleasant noise....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #4
13. They know that and have spent very little money here. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
5. Why? Because Hillary is literally delusional about her candidacy, and thinks party elders want her
She's wrong. Most of the support she has gotten from Democratic congress people is based upon the supposition that she was going to win the nomination. Now we know that is not going to happen unless all the superdelegates ignore the public will and try to throw the match to Hillary.

The truth is that many, many senior Democrats can't wait to see the end of the Hillary Clinton campaign, and are cringing at the very thought of living through another election cycle of the Bill and Hill Show.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formernaderite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #5
17. i hope you're right but
insider politics may break in her favor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #17
22. If you want to be the majority party in congress, who do you want at the top of the ticket?
NOT HILLARY is the correct answer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
monmouth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
6. I think Ms. Hillary is due for a rude awakening. He's going to sweep
the races today. She should be thinking of her own concession speech. I'm really starting to get very sick of the "Clinton Machine." Their oil is running low and they're starting to make very unpleasant noise....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Submariner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
7. Reid and Pelosi can't handle a mental-midget knuckle-head like Bush
so there is no way they can persuade Obama to hand off the nomination to republican-lite Hillary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrattotheend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
8. A lot of Pelosi's closest allies in the House have endorsed Obama
George Miller, Anna Eshoo, Zoe Logfren, and Rosa DeLauro. Doesn't necessarily mean anything, but some people thought Miller's endorsement was a hint on where Pelosi stood.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #8
26. My point is how they area all disregarding the DNC's role in the party.
They are effectively shutting it out of the process. She openly said Florida was not at fault, when obviously they were completely at fault. Glad to hear that, though, about her colleagues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillrockin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 11:46 AM
Response to Original message
9. Because they're all in bed together. Corrupt corporate politicians.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 11:47 AM
Response to Original message
10. She wouldn't. Why speculate? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
12. There is chatter erupting in the blogosphere that is a dire prediction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. Josh Marshall and Ezra Klein from your link....
Josh Marshall agrees in a post titled No Way:

"The Clinton camp really needs to be shut down on this new gambit of theirs to muscle the party and other candidates into seating the Michigan and Florida delegate slates."


And Ezra Klein, at the American Prospect, worries that Clinton's tactics will wreak havoc on the party:

"This is the sort of decision that has the potential to tear the party apart... ...It's as hard as hardball gets, and the end could be unimaginably acrimonious"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. "unimaginable acrimony"
We saw it in 2000. The Clintons better think long and hard about traveling down that path.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. Amen..
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cmkramer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
20. Question
Why do you believe the nonsense you read in the British press?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. I asked for clarification.
Can you clarify?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cmkramer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. IMHO
You seem to be implying that the Telegraph story is factual.

I'm pretty sure that if going to party leaders in Congress to persuade them to tell your opponent (s)he needs to get out of the race now worked, it would have happened long before.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. Then let me clarify again....I am asking.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newmajority Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
21. Spineless Reid and Jellyfish Pelosi are out of their (fail to be) leadership positions
When the Obamandate sweeps Washington DC, and brings the "coattails" of a super majority with him. These useless Bush appeasing Vichy "democrats" will be replaced with new leadership who will actually DO something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 03:20 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC