|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
papau (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 11:41 PM Original message |
Just as in 72 the GOP push us toward the weaker Obama via "open primaries" and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skipos (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 11:44 PM Response to Original message |
1. Yes, Ann Coulter, Glenn Beck, Rush Limbaugh, Rupert Murdoch,etc all endorse Obama |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Colobo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 11:44 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. LOL! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
papau (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 11:55 PM Response to Reply #1 |
11. Read the Pat Buchanan book on 72 - yes - they are doing the same they did to Muskie and what Pat |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cottonseed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 12:02 AM Response to Reply #1 |
24. These guys can't even keep McCain from the nomination. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jackson_dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 12:04 AM Response to Reply #1 |
25. Murdoch's flagship newspaper did endorse Obama |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skipos (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 01:10 AM Response to Reply #25 |
33. And Murdoch raised money for Obama too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
southern_dem (587 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 11:45 PM Response to Original message |
3. Give it a rest |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bellasgrams (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 11:49 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. The GOP is $$$ party. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tellurian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 11:52 PM Response to Reply #4 |
7. You expect them to connect the dots? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
southern_dem (587 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 11:55 PM Response to Reply #4 |
10. they are |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
papau (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 11:56 PM Response to Reply #3 |
12. "For profit" media accepts a $25 million a year loss from Rush's show |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bicoastal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 11:52 PM Response to Original message |
5. I was just in FreeperLand looking for misspellings of Obama's name (don't ask)... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anigbrowl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 12:12 AM Response to Reply #5 |
29. Yep... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tellurian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 12:36 AM Response to Reply #29 |
31. Neocons are the decision makers, not Republicans.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anamandujano (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 01:18 AM Response to Reply #31 |
34. Exactly, Karl Rove was probably not among the "republican acquaintances." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thunder rising (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 11:52 PM Response to Original message |
6. I was ahead of the curve signing on with Obama in Feb last year. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jody (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 11:53 PM Response to Original message |
8. IMO BO is an easy GOP win. n.t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
papau (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 11:57 PM Response to Reply #8 |
15. I think you are correct - the Dem party abandons the working man at its peril |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Proud2BAmurkin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 11:53 PM Response to Original message |
9. We've all seen this movie |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
C_U_L8R (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 12:01 AM Response to Reply #9 |
21. wow. got enough hearts? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anamandujano (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 01:20 AM Response to Reply #21 |
35. I'd send one if I hadn't maxed out on Hillary and DU. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Arugula Latte (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 11:57 PM Response to Original message |
13. Hillary is the weaker candidate by far. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AX10 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 11:57 PM Response to Original message |
14. It's a replay of 72' and 84'. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WillYourVoteBCounted (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 11:57 PM Response to Original message |
16. sorry, no dice |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlackVelvet04 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 11:59 PM Response to Reply #16 |
18. You'll enjoy President McCain then.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlackVelvet04 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 11:58 PM Response to Original message |
17. I've been reading the book |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-11-08 11:59 PM Response to Original message |
19. Your candidate can't even run a campaign...her and her name rec |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
book_worm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 12:01 AM Response to Original message |
20. It must be tough coming up with new excuses as to why HRC is losing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The_Casual_Observer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 12:01 AM Response to Original message |
22. Obama reinvented something called "new politics" in the last few months. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AX10 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 12:11 AM Response to Reply #22 |
28. He had to make up something to run on. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The_Casual_Observer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 12:22 AM Response to Reply #28 |
30. The voters falling for this are unaware that this has been tried. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hfojvt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 12:02 AM Response to Original message |
23. it's hard to compare this to 1972 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jackson_dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 12:05 AM Response to Reply #23 |
26. Obama is probably weaker |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hippo_Tron (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 12:05 AM Response to Original message |
27. You might get your history right first, McGovern was the nominee in '72 not Mondale |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beregond2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-12-08 12:59 AM Response to Original message |
32. Just as... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sun May 05th 2024, 06:52 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC