Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ohio Officials at Odds Over Paper Ballot Before March 4th Primary

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 06:56 PM
Original message
Ohio Officials at Odds Over Paper Ballot Before March 4th Primary
Edited on Mon Feb-11-08 06:58 PM by ElsewheresDaughter
"We felt it was a waste of taxpayer money because we have confidence in our system," said David Phillips"

Ohio is scrambling to correct serious flaws in its voting systems that were uncovered in a study released in December.

how confident can you be? the surge is working



CINCINNATI - Ohio’s effort to clean up its voting system before the presidential primary on March 4 has pitted state election leaders against local officials over an order to provide a paper ballot to any voter who requests one.0210 03
Secretary of State Jennifer L. Brunner, a Democrat, wants to eliminate touch-screen machines for the November election from the 53 counties that still use them and install optical scan machines to provide a paper trail.

Because the conversion cannot be completed in time for the primary in most counties, Ms. Brunner ordered the printing of paper ballots as an interim step.

“The paper ballots are not only going to provide a voter alternative for those who prefer not to use touch-screen machines, but they may also alleviate long lines,” Ms. Brunner said. “We expect a much higher than normal turnout in the primary.”

But some local officials contend the paper ballots are unnecessary and have gone to court to fight the requirement.

“We felt it was a waste of taxpayer money because we have confidence in our system,” said David Phillips, the county prosecutor in Union County, who estimated the paper ballot initiative would cost his county $68,000. He argued that state law put the choice of voting systems in the hands of county officials.

A Union County judge has issued a temporary restraining order barring the state from enforcing the change. The case challenges the secretary of state’s authority to dictate which voting systems are used. It was moved Friday to Franklin County, where Ms. Brunner’s office is located.

The Ohio attorney general has filed motions in state and federal courts to quash the temporary restraining order so that the paper ballot initiative can commence.

Ohio is scrambling to correct serious flaws in its voting systems that were uncovered in a study released in December. Touch-screen machines were found to be vulnerable to hackers using devices as rudimentary as magnets and personal digital assistants, and security measures were found to be inadequate to prevent fraud.

With touch-screen machines still in use, Ms. Brunner’s office has begun supplemental poll worker training and taken additional steps to improve the tracking of the chain of custody of voting machines.

Officials in Cuyahoga County, which includes Cleveland, and three other counties scrapped touch-screen machines and are converting to optical scanners for the primary. Cuyahoga was the scene of election fraud in 2004, when several officials were convicted of tampering with results to circumvent a recount. Ms. Brunner fired the four-member elections board and temporarily took day-to-day control before appointing a new board.

In Union County, Karla R. Herron, the board of elections director, is waiting with her hands tied, barred from printing paper ballots three weeks before the primary.

“I’m doing everything I can to prepare without breaking the law,” Ms. Herron said.

Other changes are being debated in the legislature, controlled by Republicans. The Senate has passed a bill that ensures that votes cast properly in some races on a ballot will be counted, even if votes in other races have to be discarded because too many candidates were selected.

Ms. Brunner’s goal of replacing touch-screen systems by November is far from a certainty, with resistance from county officials happy with the touch-screen systems and a lack of state or federal money to make a change.


http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/10/us/politics/10ohio.html?_r=2&ref=us&oref=slogin&oref=slogin



.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 07:01 PM
Response to Original message
1. "we have confidence in our system"
Boy Howdy! (It ain't just a river in Egypt is it. . .)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJSecularist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 07:02 PM
Response to Original message
2. Thank goodness Ken Blackwell still isn't around.
Edited on Mon Feb-11-08 07:03 PM by NJSecularist
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tatiana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 07:03 PM
Response to Original message
3. ***Slams head against brick wall*** Not this AGAIN! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 12:28 AM
Response to Original message
4. kick for awareness
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 01:37 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC