Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Florida and Michigan - the real impact/breakdown

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
dbackjon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 02:30 PM
Original message
Florida and Michigan - the real impact/breakdown
58 delegates is what the fight is over. 58.

Michigan:
Clinton: 74
Uncommited: 54

Clinton advantage: 20

You would have to assume that the 54 uncommitted will break for Obama. After all, if they had wanted Hillary, they would have voted for her.

Florida
Clinton: 105
Obama: 67
Edwards: 13
Clinton has an advantage over Obama of 38, with 13 that could swing either way.


A lot of fighting/harsh words for 58 (or 45) delegates. My prediction: The delegate margin will be greater than 58 (either way), delegates get seated, nominee kisses some MI and FL butt for a few minutes, all is forgotten, until next contested election.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
4themind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. I admit I don't fully understand the rules, so I apologize if I'm wrong but..
Edited on Mon Feb-11-08 02:39 PM by 4themind
wouldn't those 54 uncommited, not be "pledged" to anyone, since they're well uncommitted heh. I'm guessing, if they're seated, that they could choose to vote for whoever they like, which could either increase or reduce the delegate gap
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dbackjon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Very true, but again, if they were Clinton supporters in the first place
They would have declared that then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
3. Good perspective but I don't think they should be seated
and allowed to vote until all the other delegates have voted and only if they are all uncommitted.

Ultimately I do not want to deny them the right to vote....but they should be penalized for their stubbness.


If after everyone else has voted and they could still conceivablyhave an impact. Their vote should be counted. If it changes the majority however. I think you either have to go to a second ballot where everybody is a free agent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dbackjon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Good points
I hadn't even thought of the second ballot issue - when all are uncommitted and free to change votes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 12:59 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC