Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

HRC raised $115M but didn't have enough for field staff in Minnesota?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 12:41 PM
Original message
HRC raised $115M but didn't have enough for field staff in Minnesota?
Edited on Mon Feb-11-08 12:43 PM by Stephanie


What kind of management is THAT? $500,000 on parking but no money for GOTV in Maine? $5.8M to Mark Penn but nobody tells HRC the campaign is out of money? Wasn't there a huge expenditure for flowers last time? This is baffling.




Total Receipts: $115,652,361
Total Spent: $77,704,487
Cash on Hand: $37,947,874
Debts: $4,987,425
Date of last report: December 31, 2007

http://www.opensecrets.org/pres08/summary.asp?id=N00000019&cycle=2008





A lack of money is the main reason why the Clinton campaign failed to organize well enough in smaller caucus states like Minnesota, Colorado and Maine. It's not that the demographics of these states were favorable -- certainly they were not -- but donors, allies and the press have wondered by the campaign was simply not competitive enough to keep Obama's vote totals -- and thus his delegate totals -- in a standard orbit. This mistake has given Obama many extra delegates and with that, the argument that he has won more delegates than she was.

Clinton herself was not informed that the campaign was in dire financial straits until after Iowa, one adviser said. For two days, Bill Clinton camped out in the campaign's Ballston, VA headquarters and poured through the numbers with Williams and other aides. Aides and advisers say that Clinton's decision to lend herself money was not made by consulting members of the senior staff and was relayed to them after-the-fact.

http://marcambinder.theatlantic.com/archives/2008/02/learning_some_more_details_sin.php






During Clinton's 2006 Senate race, several high-ranking aides voiced concerns about loose financial controls over such things as office supplies and advertising. The current campaign appears to be run more frugally, with headquarters in Virginia rather than on K Street. But the campaign's latest reports still show unusual expenditures, such as nearly $500,000 last year for parking costs.

A review of both campaigns' financial filings show they aggressively spent money last year. Both spent more than $80 million before heading into the January primary season, including similar amounts on travel and events. Obama spent more on television advertising and field staff. Clinton spent nearly $4 million on political and media consultants; Obama spent about $1.4 million.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/02/07/AR2008020704233_pf.html



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. Whoever is in charge of the campaign should be fired.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bicentennial_baby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Seems like nobody's really in charge...
Too many cooks in the kitchen, etc...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elixir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
3. Have you campaigned for your candidate today? Make constructive use of your time instead of spread
ing crap on DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #3
13. Amazing.
Aren't you the least bit interested in how your money was spent?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
4. They budgeted strictly to end the race on Feb 5th
Yes they overspent, but they never planned on tying Obama (or anyone else) in delegates on Super Tuesday.

It was supposed to be over, her inevitability assured by now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
5. thanks for your concern
so, Obama spends money like a drunken sailor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fabio Donating Member (929 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
6. These campaigns still are a little slow on realizing
the limited effect of $$$ spent on TV.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
7. The Reality: When has Hillary ever had to be concerned about a budget?
Edited on Mon Feb-11-08 12:51 PM by TexasObserver
Not as a US senator. You never pick up the check. You never pay your way. You are American royalty.

Not as a first lady. Same.

When you've never had to manage finances, you don't. Unfortunately, she's also bad at choosing people to handle her finances and campaign management.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. I can't understand why she wasn't kept informed.
How is it that she wasn't told the campaign was out of money?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Reading the tea leaves? It implies people are afraid to tell the boss bad news.
That's how you get blind-sided in a campaign. If the boss surrounds herself with sycophants who have gotten there by being really good ass kissers, sometimes the trade off is lack of real skills and inability to give the boss bad news.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. She doesn't say to her staff, hey, how much do we have in the bank?
She doesn't ask them what the state of the finances is? That's just bizarre to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hogwyld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
9. How in the hell can she be short on cash
If she's got 37 million on hand??? Riddle me that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. the numbers are more than a month old
January campaign expenses are not included. plus note her $5M in debts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hogwyld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. It still doesn't even begin to add up
37 million at the end of the year, plus the 13 million she raised in January is 50 Million dollars. Even if you subtracted the 5 million in debt PLUS the 5 million loan, she would have to be the world's worst budgeter to blow 41 MILLION dollars in one month. Do I really want her in charge of a 3 trillion dollar budget?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. it is crazy
but what's boggling is it seems she wasn't in charge at all. how is it that she didn't know?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freetospeak Donating Member (105 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
14. Titanic
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 01:38 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC