Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

To Hillary supporters blaming caucuses and "intimidation"...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ButterflyBlood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 01:20 AM
Original message
To Hillary supporters blaming caucuses and "intimidation"...
I live in a caucus state. We voted 2:1 for Obama. There was no element of intimidation here because we didn't vote by standing in groups, we voted via paper ballots. And it was secret ballot, at least if you wanted it to be (many Obama supporters showed their votes at my precinct out of pride basically.) You didn't need to even attend the actual caucus to vote! You could've just voted and left like a normal election. And we still gave Obama a 2:1 victory, and an over 86%+ victory in my precinct.

So then how is it that the evil caucus system is the reason Obama wins?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 01:22 AM
Response to Original message
1. So the reports of old ladies being lit on fire by crazed college kids are exaggerated?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ButterflyBlood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 01:37 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Yah, don't you know?
A few screaming college kids can change any woman's vote! Because obviously women are so weak and easily intimidated, no woman can ever stand up to a man...oh yeah and if you don't support Hillary you're sexist!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CoffeeCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 01:33 AM
Response to Original message
2. You know what is so sad about all of this...
Edited on Mon Feb-11-08 01:35 AM by TwoSparkles
Is that caucuses are such an awesome way to participate in democracy.

They are organized, they are lively and everyone understands that each
person and their vote--are respected.

When you caucus, you stand with neighbors, friends and others from your community. Everyone
is so helpful and kind. There isn't any pressure, nor does anyone get angry or upset
with anyone for endorsing a particular candidate.

I caucused for Dean in '04. I was the only one for Dean so he was not viable. I had
people in every candidate camp talking to me about their candidate. I learned a great
deal, but I decided not to join another camp. No one was angry. No one threatened me or
made me feel bad. It is all respectful. We are all adults.

Hillary Clinton has disparaged the Iowa caucus process. She is now filtering this hate-filled
talking point through Web sources and through her surrogates. It's so self serving and
it's so disgusting. It's being done to SERVE HER. She's trying to diminish the effect of
Obama's multiple wins, by blaming the caucus process and criticizing it.

In effect, she is disparaging the states that have caucuses, and the people in these states
who work so hard to make them fair and professional.

I am really disgusted with what a human lawn mower Hillary Clinton is. She cuts up anything
that gets in her way, and she doesn't give a rip who that hurts or how hundreds of thousands
of people in caucus states will be affected by her lies and distortions.

She really is a selfish, myopic, ruthless person--and I am ashamed that she is a Democrat.

You would think that with 35 years of experience--that she would have learned a little bit
about being a decent, gracious person--instead of devolving into a bitter, cynical,
Rovian propagandist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 01:39 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. For that you get a heart!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CoffeeCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 01:51 AM
Response to Reply #4
9. Awwww thanks...
...for the heart. That was sweet of you.

Love your Kool Aid guy!

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 01:40 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. What a vile hate-filled post-go wash your mouth out with soap-strong soap!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CoffeeCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 01:50 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. No actually, it's not hate...it's sadness...
Sadness that Hillary Clinton would service herself, and not care one
whit about anyone else.

Hillary's needs and wants trump the caucus states, AND the untold numbers of people who just participated
in those caucuses, AND the people who worked so diligently to make those caucuses
professional and fair.

She's denigrating and insulting thousands of people.

Curious that you find truth so revolting, yet you have no qualms about your candidate
slicing and dicing caucus goers and states that have caucuses--nearly one quarter of
the Dem electorate that has voted so far in these primaries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #8
26. Clinton has made a fair assessment of caucuses--they do disenfranchise
many.

Enough said
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Egnever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 01:40 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. wow
Well said there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ginnyinWI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 01:41 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. I'm so tired of Hillary's excuses!
If she were to become president, is this what we'd hear for four years? Whining about how everything that went wrong was someone else's fault? Sheesh! What if a male candidate were to try that ploy?

And as for her ruthless tactics, maybe she has some idea that they make her look "strong". But we've already had seven years of that kind of thinking.

"Human Lawn Mower"--great imagery!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 01:51 AM
Response to Original message
10. Not all caucuses are like that though.
Edited on Mon Feb-11-08 01:53 AM by joshcryer
edit: oh, btw, I don't "defend Hillary's losses" because of the caucusing system or anything. I mean obviously there's a compenent to it, but I have no problem with the way the system is now. I think it should be changed, however, due to caucuses having so much say with so little representation. Either that, or an all day caucusing system where you don't have to be there at a certain time and place. Oh, and national voters days would be nice, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CoffeeCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 01:55 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. Have you ever participated in a caucus?
Edited on Mon Feb-11-08 02:04 AM by TwoSparkles
You speak as if you've got an encyclopedic knowledge of caucuses.

If someone says something positive about a caucus, you dismiss it and
point out that...well, not all caucuses are good.

People who participate in caucuses, have gone to them for years and help
organize them are trying to tell you guys--that what Hillary says is
pure bull.

She had no problem with the caucuses before she began tanking in the
polls in Iowa--three days before the caucus. Then, the propaganda
machine kicked in high gear.

She's been out of control with her bitter disinformation campaign
ever since, and people like you who engage in this "Swiftboatting"
are only echoing her lies.

I want to know what experience you've had in a caucus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 02:06 AM
Response to Reply #12
18. I will admit that I've never been to one, however, I have been to town meetings...
...on many ocassions. Now I know they're not the same thing, but logically, just how society works, I think that they're not fair for all sorts of reasons. I want everyone to be out there voting, I think it's incredible that the USA, supposedly the harbringer of global modern democracy, has some of the lowest turnouts of any democratic state.

And as we can see with the recent turnouts in caucuses, they simply cannot handle our populations.

Maine got 12-15% turnout of the Democratic Eligible Voters. NY got 31% of Democratic Eligible Voters (they're both closed, one is a primary the other is a caucus, as you know). And Maine had record turnouts. Almost 4 times as many people came out in Maine as in 2004. Don't you find that disconcerting?

How can people all vote, what can compell them all to vote? Where each vote is equal?

I am a proponent of direct (possibly runoff) democracy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CoffeeCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 02:14 AM
Response to Reply #18
22. You're right that town-hall meetings aren't...
Edited on Mon Feb-11-08 02:15 AM by TwoSparkles
...the same as a caucus. Not even close.

I don't find record turnouts "disconcerting". Not in the least.

This year in the Iowa caucuses, we had record turnouts. Turnout increased 100 percent
from 04. I was a precinct captain, so naturally I had a lot on my plate that
night. However, it was fun, exciting and absolutely thrilling to be involved.

Everyone worked together to make sure that we had accurate counts, the process worked
just fine and everyone went home knowing that their vote wasn't lost down some optical
scan voting machine.

It was beautiful.

Unprecedented turnout is a good thing. Any type of election process would face challenges
with record turnout. That's no reason to scrap the process.

The problem is, these "problems" with the caucuses don't exist. Hillary is making up
rumors to service herself and her campaign. That's the problem.

I think it's good that you think about these processes and that you have your own opinions
about what is good. You mentioned a runoff. It's good to think about alternatives and to
want fair processes. However, I think we can all agree that being a sore loser and disparaging
the process--to hurt your opponent is selfish, and it damages people who don't deserve it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donheld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 01:55 AM
Response to Original message
11. Not in my precinct
I can honestly say in my precinct, in Denver's Capitol Hill, there was NO intimidation at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CoffeeCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 02:02 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. Intimidation was never even SUGGESTED..
Edited on Mon Feb-11-08 02:03 AM by TwoSparkles
...until this year, by Hillary Clinton and her surrogates--AFTER she lost
the first caucus in Iowa.

The Iowa caucuses have been going on for more than 100 years. During that time,
we've never had a single candidate accuse the caucuses of disenfranchising voters
or being bastions of intimidation.

Funny, how all of this disgusting evil just simply slipped by the thousands of
politicians who won and lost in the caucuses through the years, isn't it?

This is getting utterly ridiculous.

Our caucus process is fine. There is nothing wrong with it. There is something
wrong with Hillary Clinton--because she is willing to denigrate the states that
have caucuses, and the people who vote and organize them---to leverage her own
political distortions.

I have newfound disrespect for her--because of this.

When you know the truth, and see it---and you watch a candidate lie and distort--it's
very sad and very telling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cooolandrew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 02:01 AM
Response to Original message
13. Exactly, he has genuinely won. The labels we've got "c" words, mysogynists and now violent bullies..
...That is not the Obama supporters I have witnessed they all seem very good nature and enthusiastic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hill_YesWeWill Donating Member (652 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 02:03 AM
Response to Original message
15. well, I'd picka caucus over a primary any day, it actually seems more democratic
and a lot more involved and Fun!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 02:03 AM
Response to Original message
16. They're just cranky, that's why they're making these absurd cult comments.
It's probably got something to do with the Metamusil shortage. All that ... anger ... backed up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CoffeeCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 02:06 AM
Response to Reply #16
19. Well, hold on Texas...
...all of that anger will be in your state, in less than a month.

If your state does not go Hillary's way, you should expect her to start
insulting your state and your political process!

Get ready for it. It's coming!

Vote for Hillary or your whole state is a sham!

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 02:14 AM
Response to Reply #19
23. Well, maybe that new cereal will be available for them by then.
What's it called? Oh yeah, Colon Blow, with 48 times the fiber as TOTAL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CoffeeCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 02:16 AM
Response to Reply #23
24. I wouldn't want them campaigning in my state...
...after eating a few bowls of that!

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hill_YesWeWill Donating Member (652 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 02:19 AM
Response to Reply #19
25. Bring it on, I cant wait for the candidates to come here, I live about an hour north east of Austin
and I'm starting to see myself as right in the middle of the two candidates, I really like them both, maybe I'm undecided?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nonconformist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 02:05 AM
Response to Original message
17. I hope North Dakota goes blue in November, with all that Obama support
And gives us their 3 electoral votes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ButterflyBlood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 02:10 AM
Response to Reply #17
20. So now only blue state Democrats' votes matter?
Well previously we've heard fro Billary that blacks' votes don't matter, next step...

But my 2:1 Obama state is a blue state, and the one with the longest streak of voting Democratic, since 1976 and beyond.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lligrd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 02:13 AM
Response to Original message
21. I'd Love The Opportunity To Participate In A Caucus
I think it is wonderful that you guys have a choice. With us it is just stand in line, vote and go to work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 11:22 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC